On 17.01.2012 02:49, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
>> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/917005
>
> Okay. Even if this turns out to be another bug it would need to be
> resolved in unstable first
Of course.
> I've accepted the package you uploaded.
Many thanks.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-rele
On Mon, 2012-01-16 at 10:04 +0800, Rolf Leggewie wrote:
> On 15.01.2012 23:28, Maximilian Gerhard wrote:
> >> Adding configs to ~/.pastebin.d overrides everything, because of the
> >> "pastebind" configuration list reset. But that's the way it is upstream.
>
> I've opened a ticket upstream to see
On 15.01.2012 23:28, Maximilian Gerhard wrote:
>> Adding configs to ~/.pastebin.d overrides everything, because of the
>> "pastebind" configuration list reset. But that's the way it is upstream.
I've opened a ticket upstream to see if this is really intentional.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/91
On Sun, 2012-01-15 at 16:28 +0100, Maximilian Gerhard wrote:
> Am 15.01.2012 13:25, schrieb Adam D. Barratt:
> > Looking at the diff in the context of the original code, I'm a little
> > confused as to the intended functionality. Assume that I
> > have /etc/pastebin.d/config1, /etc/pastebin.d/conf
Am 15.01.2012 13:25, schrieb Adam D. Barratt:
> Yes, it needs an explicit manual ack before it moves in to
> proposed-updates. We still prefer to finalise the debdiff before the
> upload occurs however, as repeated upload/reject cycles are annoying for
> both sides.
>
> Looking at the diff in the
On Sun, 2012-01-15 at 14:12 +0800, Rolf Leggewie wrote:
> On 15.01.2012 00:09, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > sounds like something I'd be okay with fixing in a point release.
>
> I've now taken the liberty to actually make the upload to stable. Since
> a member of the release team needs to either AC
On 15.01.2012 00:09, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> sounds like something I'd be okay with fixing in a point release.
I've now taken the liberty to actually make the upload to stable. Since
a member of the release team needs to either ACK or reject this anyhow I
thought we might as well do it on the re
On 15.01.2012 00:09, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> I'd like to see a debdiff for a final ack, but from the description
> provided this sounds like something I'd be okay with fixing in a point
> release.
Adam, thank you for your reply. Not quite a debdiff but I suppose
http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~past
On Mon, 2012-01-09 at 11:42 +0800, Rolf Leggewie wrote:
> thank you for your report. You request a backport of upstream commit
> r81 to version 1.1-2 of pastebinit in Squeeze. I'm willing to do that
> as I believe your request has merit, but I'd like to hear from the
> Stable Release Team first w
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Severity: important
thank you
Max,
thank you for your report. You request a backport of upstream commit
r81 to version 1.1-2 of pastebinit in Squeeze. I'm willing to do that
as I believe your request has merit, but I'd like to hear from the
Stable
Severity: normal
thank you
Max,
thank you for your report. You request a backport of upstream commit r81 to
version 1.1-2 of pastebinit in Squeeze. I'm willing to do that as I believe
your request has merit, but I'd like to hear from the Stable Release Team first
what they think. They will
11 matches
Mail list logo
