Bug#682460: unblock: boost1.50/1.50.0-1

2012-08-05 Thread Steve M. Robbins
On Sat, Jul 28, 2012 at 04:34:31PM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote: > On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 20:26:36 -0500, Steve M. Robbins wrote: > > > Yes, it's a judgement call, I'd agree. My thinking is that (a) it's > > already building on all architectures (low risk) and (b) has somewhat > > better support

Bug#682460: unblock: boost1.50/1.50.0-1

2012-07-28 Thread Julien Cristau
Hi Steve, On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 20:26:36 -0500, Steve M. Robbins wrote: > Yes, it's a judgement call, I'd agree. My thinking is that (a) it's > already building on all architectures (low risk) and (b) has somewhat > better support for GCC 4.7 and (c) it's Boost :-) > Could providing updated b

Bug#682460: unblock: boost1.50/1.50.0-1

2012-07-23 Thread Steve M. Robbins
On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 11:04:13AM +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > Hi, > > Steve M. Robbins (22/07/2012): > > Given the long lifetime of stable Debian, I expect users would > > appreciate having the latest Boost available. This is a leaf package > > so should have no impact on stability of the a

Bug#682460: unblock: boost1.50/1.50.0-1

2012-07-23 Thread Cyril Brulebois
Hi, Steve M. Robbins (22/07/2012): > Given the long lifetime of stable Debian, I expect users would > appreciate having the latest Boost available. This is a leaf package > so should have no impact on stability of the archive. > > [Testing currently has Boost 1.49 as default and I propose to ke

Bug#682460: unblock: boost1.50/1.50.0-1

2012-07-22 Thread Steve M. Robbins
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Please unblock package boost1.50 Given the long lifetime of stable Debian, I expect users would appreciate having the latest Boost available. This is a leaf package so should have no impa