Hi,
On Sun, Oct 07, 2012 at 08:54:07PM +0200, Philipp Kern wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 07, 2012 at 07:35:09PM +0200, Kilian Krause wrote:
> > since F*EX is now re-added as non-free with Perl Artistic license I herewith
> > renew my request to allow the fex package to proceed to testing and thus
> > allow
Hi,
On Sun, Oct 07, 2012 at 07:35:09PM +0200, Kilian Krause wrote:
> since F*EX is now re-added as non-free with Perl Artistic license I herewith
> renew my request to allow the fex package to proceed to testing and thus
> allowing users of squeeze an upgrade path.
did you submit the filtered dif
Hi Philipp,
since F*EX is now re-added as non-free with Perl Artistic license I herewith
renew my request to allow the fex package to proceed to testing and thus
allowing users of squeeze an upgrade path.
Cheers,
Kilian
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Ulli Horlacher writes:
> On Sat 2012-08-25 (16:34), Philipp Kern wrote:
>
>> Upstream could be petitioned to remove that clause... (I sort of understand
>> it,
>> too, but it's clearly against Debian's standards.)
>
> "Upstream" is me, the original author of F*EX.
> No, I will not remove the anti
On Sat 2012-08-25 (16:34), Philipp Kern wrote:
> Upstream could be petitioned to remove that clause... (I sort of understand
> it,
> too, but it's clearly against Debian's standards.)
"Upstream" is me, the original author of F*EX.
No, I will not remove the anti-military clause in the license.
On Sat, Aug 25, 2012 at 03:50:00PM +0200, Kilian Krause wrote:
> As I'm not seeing any chance of meeting DFSG criteria 5 and 6 with the above
> intention (which clearly is discriminating certain groups - even though
> personally I can perfectly well understand upstream's will on why this is)
> I'm
Hi Philipp,
On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 02:24:41AM +0200, Philipp Kern wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 18, 2012 at 09:13:42PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > + YOU ARE NOT ALLOWED TO USE THIS SOFTWARE FOR MILITARY PURPOSES OR WITHIN
> > + MILITARY ORGANIZATIONS! THIS INCLUDES ALSO MILITARY RESEARCH AND
> > + E
Hi Adam,
On Sat, Aug 18, 2012 at 09:13:42PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On Tue, 2012-08-07 at 09:10 +0200, Kilian Krause wrote:
> > Please unblock package fex
> >
> > It addresses all currently known issues. It would be great if this could
> > make it into wheezy still to spare us unneccessar
On Sat, Aug 18, 2012 at 09:13:42PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> + YOU ARE NOT ALLOWED TO USE THIS SOFTWARE FOR MILITARY PURPOSES OR WITHIN
> + MILITARY ORGANIZATIONS! THIS INCLUDES ALSO MILITARY RESEARCH AND
> + EDUCATION!
> That doesn't really seem like something Debian can really meet or
> enf
Control: tags -1 + moreinfo
On Tue, 2012-08-07 at 09:10 +0200, Kilian Krause wrote:
> Please unblock package fex
>
> It addresses all currently known issues. It would be great if this could
> make it into wheezy still to spare us unneccessary work with supporting
> the 20120215-3 on our own.
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 + moreinfo
Bug #684117 [release.debian.org] unblock: fex/20120718-4
Added tag(s) moreinfo.
--
684117: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=684117
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email t
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package fex
It addresses all currently known issues. It would be great if this could
make it into wheezy still to spare us unneccessary work with supporting
the 20120215-3 on
12 matches
Mail list logo
