On Mon, 2012-12-31 at 02:06 +0100, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
On 2012-12-30 13:45, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 12:16:48 +0200, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
is another possibility to address the missing multiarchification of
libxvmc1: if we split the libgl1-nvidia-glx package and
On 2012-12-30 13:45, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 12:16:48 +0200, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
is another possibility to address the missing multiarchification of
libxvmc1: if we split the libgl1-nvidia-glx package and move one library
to a new libxvmcnvidia1 library we can move
On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 12:16:48 +0200, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please approve the following changes for package
nvidia-graphics-drivers:
As discussed in #688861 (freeze
On 2012-10-04 15:40, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
On 2012-09-27 12:16, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
Please approve the following changes for package
nvidia-graphics-drivers:
As discussed in #688861 (freeze exception for libxvmc) yesterday, there
is another possibility to address the missing
On 2012-09-27 12:16, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
Please approve the following changes for package
nvidia-graphics-drivers:
As discussed in #688861 (freeze exception for libxvmc) yesterday, there
is another possibility to address the missing multiarchification of
libxvmc1: if we split the
Hi,
here I'm attaching the debdiffs for the two further proposed new
packages that I mentioned in the initial mail:
* adding a new nvidia-cuda-proxy binary package
and
* turning the virtual package libgl1-nvidia-glx-i386 into a real package
(with M-A: foreign) to automatically pull
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please approve the following changes for package
nvidia-graphics-drivers:
As discussed in #688861 (freeze exception for libxvmc) yesterday, there
is another possibility to address the
7 matches
Mail list logo
