On Sun, Dec 30, 2012 at 13:37:51 +0100, Sylvestre Ledru wrote:
> On 29/12/2012 18:24, Julien Cristau wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 11:40:06 +0100, Sylvestre Ledru wrote:
> >
> >> So, to fix this issue, should I do the following ?
> >>
> >> * ask for a removal of clang 3.1 in unstable * uplo
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 29/12/2012 18:24, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 11:40:06 +0100, Sylvestre Ledru wrote:
>
>> So, to fix this issue, should I do the following ?
>>
>> * ask for a removal of clang 3.1 in unstable * upload a version
>> 3.0 in unstab
On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 11:40:06 +0100, Sylvestre Ledru wrote:
> So, to fix this issue, should I do the following ?
>
> * ask for a removal of clang 3.1 in unstable
> * upload a version 3.0 in unstable with Peter patch
> * ask for an exception
>
I'm not sure what the point of your first step wou
On Mon, 26 Nov 2012 13:25:12 +0100
Sylvestre Ledru wrote:
> > Regarding the current clang packages in the repositories (3.0 in
> > testing, 3.1 in unstable), you would have to add an epoch to
> > downgrade clang to 3.0 in unstable with a fix and then have to fix
> > migrated to testing. This would
On 26/11/2012 12:42, Arthur Loiret wrote:
> Hello Sylvestre,
>
> Installing clang and llvm-runtime packages on my Debian testing, here is
> what I get :
>
> $ cat hello.c
> #include
> int main (void) {
> printf ("Hello, world!\n");
> return 0;
> }
> $ clang -emit-llvm -c hello.c
Hello Sylvestre,
Installing clang and llvm-runtime packages on my Debian testing, here is
what I get :
$ cat hello.c
#include
int main (void) {
printf ("Hello, world!\n");
return 0;
}
$ clang -emit-llvm -c hello.c && lli hello.o
lli: hello.o: unknown type in type table
However,
On 14/11/2012 11:45, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 09:24:50 +, peter green wrote:
>
>> I have attatched a diff which I would like to upload to TPU are the
>> maintainer and release team happy with this? I have tested that the
>> patch does not break linking on armel with eith
On 14/11/2012 11:45, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 09:24:50 +, peter green wrote:
>
>> I have attatched a diff which I would like to upload to TPU are the
>> maintainer and release team happy with this? I have tested that the
>> patch does not break linking on armel with eithe
On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 09:24:50 +, peter green wrote:
> I have attatched a diff which I would like to upload to TPU are the
> maintainer and release team happy with this? I have tested that the
> patch does not break linking on armel with either bfd or gold.
>
> P.S. it seems the version in
Package: clang
Version: 3.0-6
Severity: grave
Tags: patch
x-debbugs-cc: debian-release@lists.debian.org
RT in cc because of proposed TPU upload.
Unfortunately it seems that the changes in 3.0-6 fixed clang on armel
but not on armhf.
root@debian:/# clang -v test.c
Debian clang version 3.0-6 (tag
10 matches
Mail list logo
