Bug#694525: nmu: 227 source packages, for GStaticMutex

2012-12-30 Thread Simon McVittie
On 29/12/12 17:55, Julien Cristau wrote: >> - if possible, get a list of packages in squeeze that expose an >> affected struct (gstreamer, glibmm, others?) > Ping. We need to make some progress here... I'm still trying to construct this list. It's going to take a while. On the positive side, it

Bug#694525: nmu: 227 source packages, for GStaticMutex

2012-12-29 Thread Julien Cristau
On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 13:51:26 +0100, Julien Cristau wrote: > Before rebuilding the world, I'd like to avoid breaking partial > upgrades. Which, as far as I can tell, means: > - if possible, get a list of packages in squeeze that expose an affected > struct (gstreamer, glibmm, others?) > - on

Bug#694525: nmu: 227 source packages, for GStaticMutex

2012-11-30 Thread Julien Cristau
On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 09:05:49 +, Simon McVittie wrote: > Package: release.debian.org > Severity: normal > User: release.debian@packages.debian.org > Usertags: binnmu > > The upgrade from GLib 2.30 to 2.32 breaks ABI on most non-x86 32-bit > architectures (#674156). Specifically, the de

Bug#694525: nmu: 227 source packages, for GStaticMutex

2012-11-27 Thread Julien Cristau
On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 09:36:56 +, Simon McVittie wrote: > I'd hoped that binNMUing for all architectures with the same "commit > message" avoided that, but I suppose the timestamp in debian/changelog > is what causes the problem? > Timestamp, name/address, and "Binary-only non-maintainer up

Bug#694525: nmu: 227 source packages, for GStaticMutex

2012-11-27 Thread Simon McVittie
On 27/11/12 09:28, Julien Cristau wrote: > *sigh* Yeah, I know. I don't think there is a good solution to this, and mass-binNMUing seems like the least awful. >> Here is a lengthy list of binNMUs. I would like these to be done on all >> architectures [...] those >> packages from this list that ar

Bug#694525: nmu: 227 source packages, for GStaticMutex

2012-11-27 Thread Cyril Brulebois
Simon McVittie (27/11/2012): > Here is a lengthy list of binNMUs. I would like these to be done on > all architectures: our slower architectures are the ones that really > need the rebuild anyway, and if we also rebuild on the fast > architectures, then those packages from this list that are multi

Bug#694525: nmu: 227 source packages, for GStaticMutex

2012-11-27 Thread Julien Cristau
On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 09:05:49 +, Simon McVittie wrote: > Package: release.debian.org > Severity: normal > User: release.debian@packages.debian.org > Usertags: binnmu > > The upgrade from GLib 2.30 to 2.32 breaks ABI on most non-x86 32-bit > architectures (#674156). Specifically, the de

Bug#694525: nmu: 227 source packages, for GStaticMutex

2012-11-27 Thread Simon McVittie
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: binnmu The upgrade from GLib 2.30 to 2.32 breaks ABI on most non-x86 32-bit architectures (#674156). Specifically, the deprecated struct GStaticMutex, and the deprecated structs GStaticRecMutex and