On 31/03/13 14:53, Andrew Shadura wrote:
> However, we had it without -1 for at least one release before;
> actually, neither variant solves all the issues, so it seems the best
> thing to do now is to stick to what we've had in squeeze.
Actually I agree now that removing the -1 flag is safest (re
Hello,
On Sun, 31 Mar 2013 14:46:59 +0100
Steven Chamberlain wrote:
> Control: retitle -1 unblock: ifupdown/0.7.7
Steven, thanks for updating the unblock request; I should've done that
myself and forgot to.
> I'm not on the Release Team but this change sounds scary to me; it
> changes behavio
Processing control commands:
> retitle -1 unblock: ifupdown/0.7.7
Bug #698381 [release.debian.org] unblock: ifupdown/0.7.6
Changed Bug title to 'unblock: ifupdown/0.7.7' from 'unblock: ifupdown/0.7.6'
--
698381: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=698381
Debian Bug Tracking System
C
Control: retitle -1 unblock: ifupdown/0.7.7
Hi,
On 25/03/13 10:42, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 19:58:31 +0100, Andrew Shadura wrote:
>> Please unblock package ifupdown. This release fixes some important issues
>> with ifupdown,
>> and also brings upstart support up to date.
>
4 matches
Mail list logo
