Your message dated Mon, 11 Feb 2013 21:42:11 +0000
with message-id <20130211214211.gf5...@ernie.home.powdarrmonkey.net>
and subject line Re: Bug#698701: tpu: dspam/3.10.1+dfsg-8
has caused the Debian Bug report #698701,
regarding tpu: dspam/3.10.1+dfsg-8
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
698701: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=698701
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian....@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package dspam
Sorry to come again with an issue on dspam again. This time it's about
bug #698580 - useless prompting at upgrade when no configuration file
have been modified. A mistake was made which made
/etc/dspam/dspam.d/{pgsql,mysql}.conf be conffiles and yet managed by
ucf. This patch move ucf template from /etc to /usr/share subdirectories
to avoid them being conffiles. See attached debdiff for the details
(avoid_useless_prompt.debdiff).
As before, the package being different in testing and sid, the fix would
have to go through tpu. The fix has just been uploaded to sid for more
testing.
I would also like to include the fix for #698136. I know it's only of
severity important but it's a simple oneliner fix so maybe you'll agree
for it anyway. See [1] for the patch.
[1]
http://patch-tracker.debian.org/patch/series/view/dspam/3.10.2+dfsg-4/009_fix_recipient_corruption_when_releasing_message_from_quarantine.diff
Best regards,
Thomas Preud'homme
unblock dspam/3.10.1+dfsg-8
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 7.0
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (990, 'unstable'), (500, 'stable-updates'), (500, 'testing'),
(500, 'stable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386
Kernel: Linux 3.2.0-4-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
diff -Nru dspam-3.10.1+dfsg/debian/changelog dspam-3.10.1+dfsg/debian/changelog
--- dspam-3.10.1+dfsg/debian/changelog 2013-01-19 21:11:32.000000000 +0100
+++ dspam-3.10.1+dfsg/debian/changelog 2013-01-22 13:38:35.000000000 +0100
@@ -1,3 +1,11 @@
+dspam (3.10.1+dfsg-8) testing-proposed-updates; urgency=low
+
+ * Stop shipping ucf template as a conffile: this avoid unnecessary prompt
+ when upgrading if configuration files have not been modified by the user
+ (Closes: #698580).
+
+ -- Thomas Preud'homme <robo...@debian.org> Mon, 21 Jan 2013 22:25:00 +0100
+
dspam (3.10.1+dfsg-7) testing-proposed-updates; urgency=low
* Disable multi-arch since it create many problems with regards to the
diff -Nru dspam-3.10.1+dfsg/debian/libdspam7-drv-mysql.dirs dspam-3.10.1+dfsg/debian/libdspam7-drv-mysql.dirs
--- dspam-3.10.1+dfsg/debian/libdspam7-drv-mysql.dirs 2013-01-19 21:11:32.000000000 +0100
+++ dspam-3.10.1+dfsg/debian/libdspam7-drv-mysql.dirs 2013-01-22 13:38:35.000000000 +0100
@@ -1,3 +1,4 @@
etc/dspam/dspam.d
+usr/share/libdspam7-drv-mysql
usr/share/dbconfig-common/data/libdspam7-drv-mysql/install
usr/share/dbconfig-common/data/libdspam7-drv-mysql/upgrade
diff -Nru dspam-3.10.1+dfsg/debian/libdspam7-drv-mysql.install.in dspam-3.10.1+dfsg/debian/libdspam7-drv-mysql.install.in
--- dspam-3.10.1+dfsg/debian/libdspam7-drv-mysql.install.in 2013-01-19 21:11:32.000000000 +0100
+++ dspam-3.10.1+dfsg/debian/libdspam7-drv-mysql.install.in 2013-01-22 13:38:35.000000000 +0100
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
debian/sqlfiles/install/mysql usr/share/dbconfig-common/data/libdspam7-drv-mysql/install
debian/sqlfiles/upgrade/mysql usr/share/dbconfig-common/data/libdspam7-drv-mysql/upgrade
usr/lib/@DEB_HOST_MULTIARCH@/dspam/libmysql_drv.so*
-src/mysql.conf etc/dspam/dspam.d/
+src/mysql.conf usr/share/libdspam7-drv-mysql
src/tools.mysql_drv/mysql_objects-4.1.sql usr/share/doc/libdspam7-drv-mysql/sql/
src/tools.mysql_drv/purge-4.1.sql usr/share/doc/libdspam7-drv-mysql/sql/
src/tools.mysql_drv/virtual_user_aliases.sql usr/share/doc/libdspam7-drv-mysql/sql/
diff -Nru dspam-3.10.1+dfsg/debian/libdspam7-drv-mysql.postinst dspam-3.10.1+dfsg/debian/libdspam7-drv-mysql.postinst
--- dspam-3.10.1+dfsg/debian/libdspam7-drv-mysql.postinst 2013-01-19 21:11:32.000000000 +0100
+++ dspam-3.10.1+dfsg/debian/libdspam7-drv-mysql.postinst 2013-01-22 13:38:35.000000000 +0100
@@ -9,7 +9,7 @@
# Set some variables
dbc_generate_include=template:/etc/dspam/dspam.d/mysql.conf
-dbc_generate_include_args="-U -o template_infile='/etc/dspam/dspam.d/mysql.conf'"
+dbc_generate_include_args="-U -o template_infile='/usr/share/libdspam7-drv-mysql/mysql.conf'"
# Run dbconfig
dbc_go libdspam7-drv-mysql $@
diff -Nru dspam-3.10.1+dfsg/debian/libdspam7-drv-pgsql.dirs dspam-3.10.1+dfsg/debian/libdspam7-drv-pgsql.dirs
--- dspam-3.10.1+dfsg/debian/libdspam7-drv-pgsql.dirs 2013-01-19 21:11:32.000000000 +0100
+++ dspam-3.10.1+dfsg/debian/libdspam7-drv-pgsql.dirs 2013-01-22 13:38:35.000000000 +0100
@@ -1,4 +1,5 @@
etc/dspam/dspam.d
+usr/share/libdspam7-drv-pgsql
usr/share/dbconfig-common/data/libdspam7-drv-pgsql/install
usr/share/dbconfig-common/data/libdspam7-drv-pgsql/upgrade
usr/share/dbconfig-common/data/libdspam7-drv-pgsql/install-dbadmin
diff -Nru dspam-3.10.1+dfsg/debian/libdspam7-drv-pgsql.install.in dspam-3.10.1+dfsg/debian/libdspam7-drv-pgsql.install.in
--- dspam-3.10.1+dfsg/debian/libdspam7-drv-pgsql.install.in 2013-01-19 21:11:32.000000000 +0100
+++ dspam-3.10.1+dfsg/debian/libdspam7-drv-pgsql.install.in 2013-01-22 13:38:35.000000000 +0100
@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
debian/sqlfiles/install/pgsql usr/share/dbconfig-common/data/libdspam7-drv-pgsql/install
debian/sqlfiles/upgrade/pgsql usr/share/dbconfig-common/data/libdspam7-drv-pgsql/upgrade
usr/lib/@DEB_HOST_MULTIARCH@/dspam/libpgsql_drv.so*
-src/pgsql.conf etc/dspam/dspam.d/
+src/pgsql.conf usr/share/libdspam7-drv-pgsql
src/tools.pgsql_drv/pgsql_objects.sql usr/share/doc/libdspam7-drv-pgsql/sql/
src/tools.pgsql_drv/purge-pe.sql usr/share/doc/libdspam7-drv-pgsql/sql/
src/tools.pgsql_drv/virtual_users.sql usr/share/doc/libdspam7-drv-pgsql/sql/
diff -Nru dspam-3.10.1+dfsg/debian/libdspam7-drv-pgsql.postinst dspam-3.10.1+dfsg/debian/libdspam7-drv-pgsql.postinst
--- dspam-3.10.1+dfsg/debian/libdspam7-drv-pgsql.postinst 2013-01-19 21:11:32.000000000 +0100
+++ dspam-3.10.1+dfsg/debian/libdspam7-drv-pgsql.postinst 2013-01-22 13:38:35.000000000 +0100
@@ -6,7 +6,7 @@
# Set some variables
dbc_generate_include=template:/etc/dspam/dspam.d/pgsql.conf
-dbc_generate_include_args="-U -o template_infile='/etc/dspam/dspam.d/pgsql.conf'"
+dbc_generate_include_args="-U -o template_infile='/usr/share/libdspam7-drv-pgsql/pgsql.conf'"
# Load dbconfig (pgsql part)
. /usr/share/dbconfig-common/dpkg/postinst.pgsql
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 03:26:42PM +0100, Thomas Preud'homme wrote:
> Le dimanche 3 février 2013 14:51:39, Thomas Preud'homme a écrit :
> >
> > Anyway, I tried to get certainty by reading the code to see any assumption
> > the code is using but I couldn't understand enough of the code. So I
> > reached upstream and he shall give me an explanation about wether it's
> > safe or not and why in the next days.
>
> I pinged again upstream last wednesday without answer. Given the risk, I'm
> going to drop the patch for the recipient corruption. I don't like it but
> it's
> not a regression and the bug is only of severity important.
>
> Anyway, the package had around 3 weeks of testing in unstable so I proceeded
> with the upload to tpu. The changes only include the fix for the ucf RC bug
> issue. See attached debdiff.
Ok, I accepted your tpu upload for the RC bug at least, but I would like to
see a fix for the important bug too. The potential for silent data loss
worries me - or does the sender get a notification that the mail has been
dropped from the quarantine, or have I mis-understood the situation?
--
Jonathan Wiltshire j...@debian.org
Debian Developer http://people.debian.org/~jmw
4096R: 0xD3524C51 / 0A55 B7C5 1223 3942 86EC 74C3 5394 479D D352 4C51
<directhex> i have six years of solaris sysadmin experience, from
8->10. i am well qualified to say it is made from bonghits
layered on top of bonghits
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
--- End Message ---
