Hi Adam,
Adam D. Barratt a...@adam-barratt.org.uk writes:
Ping?
As discussed in IRC, I uploaded 2.92+dfsg1-0.1~deb7u1 to
testing-proposed-updates.
Sorry for taking so long to react on this one.
--
Best regards,
Michael
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
On Thu, 2013-02-28 at 20:21 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On Sun, 2013-02-10 at 14:26 +0100, Michael Stapelberg wrote:
Adam D. Barratt a...@adam-barratt.org.uk writes:
It looks like this issue still affects the unstable package; is that
correct? If so then it should be resolved there
On Sun, 2013-02-10 at 14:26 +0100, Michael Stapelberg wrote:
Adam D. Barratt a...@adam-barratt.org.uk writes:
It looks like this issue still affects the unstable package; is that
correct? If so then it should be resolved there first, before we
consider a tpu.
That is correct. I will NMU
Hi,
Le 06/02/2013 13:56, Michael Stapelberg a écrit :
I would like to upload lcdf-typetools/2.92+dfsg1-1.1 to
testing-proposed-updates to fix #694352 in wheezy. At the moment,
2.92-1+b1 is in testing and 2.92-2 is in unstable.
Is there any reason not to push this version directly in unstable
Control: tags -1 + moreinfo
On Wed, 2013-02-06 at 18:56 +0100, Michael Stapelberg wrote:
I would like to upload lcdf-typetools/2.92+dfsg1-1.1 to
testing-proposed-updates to fix #694352 in wheezy. At the moment,
2.92-1+b1 is in testing and 2.92-2 is in unstable.
The debdiff is attached.
Processing control commands:
tags -1 + moreinfo
Bug #699915 [release.debian.org] tpu: lcdf-typetools/2.92+dfsg1-1.1
Added tag(s) moreinfo.
--
699915: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=699915
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--
To
On Sun, Feb 10, 2013 at 3:12 AM, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
Hmmm, actually... having compared the file currently shipped in
lcdf-typetools with that from the aglfn package, the difference
appears to be purely the license statement; the actual data is
identical. In that case I assume Adobe haven't
7 matches
Mail list logo
