Bug#706142: pu: telepathy-idle/0.1.11-2+deb7u1

2013-06-20 Thread Adam D. Barratt
Control: tags -1 + pending On Mon, 2013-06-17 at 22:00 +0100, Simon McVittie wrote: > On 16/06/13 19:11, Adam D. Barratt wrote:> On Sun, 2013-06-16 at 14:10 > +0100, Simon McVittie wrote: > >> Assuming my backport gets accepted into wheezy-backports, does the > >> attached debdiff look OK? > > > >

Processed: Re: Bug#706142: pu: telepathy-idle/0.1.11-2+deb7u1

2013-06-20 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tags -1 + pending Bug #706142 [release.debian.org] pu: telepathy-idle/0.1.11-2+deb7u1 Added tag(s) pending. -- 706142: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=706142 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE

Bug#706142: pu: telepathy-idle/0.1.11-2+deb7u1

2013-06-17 Thread Simon McVittie
On 16/06/13 19:11, Adam D. Barratt wrote:> On Sun, 2013-06-16 at 14:10 +0100, Simon McVittie wrote: >> Assuming my backport gets accepted into wheezy-backports, does the >> attached debdiff look OK? > > Yes, thanks. Uploaded. S -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debia

Bug#706142: pu: telepathy-idle/0.1.11-2+deb7u1

2013-06-16 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Sun, 2013-06-16 at 14:10 +0100, Simon McVittie wrote: > On Fri, 07 Jun 2013 at 09:38:02 +0100, Simon McVittie wrote: > > Does the RT have any opinion on which of the possible resolutions would > > be acceptable/preferred for stable? > > In the absence of feedback, Sorry; I've been somewhat dis

Bug#706142: pu: telepathy-idle/0.1.11-2+deb7u1

2013-06-16 Thread Simon McVittie
On Fri, 07 Jun 2013 at 09:38:02 +0100, Simon McVittie wrote: > Does the RT have any opinion on which of the possible resolutions would > be acceptable/preferred for stable? In the absence of feedback, I've assumed that this one is likely to be unacceptable: > * upload 0.1.16 to wheezy (~1k lines

Bug#706142: pu: telepathy-idle/0.1.11-2+deb7u1

2013-06-07 Thread Simon McVittie
On 06/06/13 22:19, Adam D. Barratt wrote:> On Thu, 2013-05-23 at 11:10 +0100, Simon McVittie wrote: >> Cc pkg-telepathy-maintainers: could someone who uses telepathy-idle >> regularly please pick this up? Apparently the answer to that is "no". :-( >> Sorry, I've been holding off on this because t

Bug#706142: pu: telepathy-idle/0.1.11-2+deb7u1

2013-06-06 Thread Adam D. Barratt
Control: tags -1 -confirmed +moreinfo On Thu, 2013-05-23 at 11:10 +0100, Simon McVittie wrote: > On 22/05/13 22:14, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > > Ping? > > Cc pkg-telepathy-maintainers: could someone who uses telepathy-idle > regularly please pick this up? > > Sorry, I've been holding off on this b

Processed: Re: Bug#706142: pu: telepathy-idle/0.1.11-2+deb7u1

2013-06-06 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tags -1 -confirmed +moreinfo Bug #706142 [release.debian.org] tpu (or pu): telepathy-idle/0.1.11-2+deb7u1 Removed tag(s) confirmed. Bug #706142 [release.debian.org] tpu (or pu): telepathy-idle/0.1.11-2+deb7u1 Added tag(s) moreinfo. -- 706142: http://bugs.debian.org

Bug#706142: pu: telepathy-idle/0.1.11-2+deb7u1

2013-05-23 Thread Simon McVittie
On 22/05/13 22:14, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > On Sat, 2013-05-11 at 17:58 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: >> On Thu, 2013-04-25 at 12:47 +0100, Simon McVittie wrote: >>> The version of telepathy-idle in wheezy does not validate IRC servers' >>> SSL certificates when used with SSL (#706094, CVE ID reque