Bug#714040: transition: glew

2013-11-04 Thread Niels Thykier
Control: tags -1 confimed pending Control: owner -1 ! On 2013-10-29 11:13, Matteo F. Vescovi wrote: > Control: retitle -1 transition: glew 1.10 > > Hi again! > > On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 03:18:31PM +0200, Matteo F. Vescovi wrote: >> Update: after a quick rebuild against pure unstable, it seems li

Processed (with 1 errors): Re: Bug#714040: transition: glew

2013-11-04 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tags -1 confimed pending Unknown tag/s: confimed. Recognized are: patch wontfix moreinfo unreproducible fixed potato woody sid help security upstream pending sarge sarge-ignore experimental d-i confirmed ipv6 lfs fixed-in-experimental fixed-upstream l10n etch etch-

Bug#714040: transition: glew

2013-10-29 Thread Matteo F. Vescovi
Control: retitle -1 transition: glew 1.10 Hi again! On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 03:18:31PM +0200, Matteo F. Vescovi wrote: > Update: after a quick rebuild against pure unstable, it seems like > that even arb failure has to be considered as glew-related. On July 22nd, 2013 a new upstream version (1.1

Bug#714040: transition: glew

2013-06-25 Thread Matteo F. Vescovi
On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 09:10:41AM +0200, Matteo F. Vescovi wrote: > Just one of the packages (bino) in that list seems to be affected > directly by this transition and fails to build because of that. > Others packages (12), instead, FTBFS but with no glew dependency. Update: after a quick rebuild

Bug#714040: transition: glew

2013-06-25 Thread Matteo F. Vescovi
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: transition Dear Release Team, I'm filing this bug for a new transition of glew package. On August 6, 2012 the 1.9.0 actual stable version has been released by upstream. On August 13, 2012 a first