On 18/06/14 23:28, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> On 18/06/14 19:50, Andreas Metzler wrote:
>> nmu boinctui_2.3.4-1 ALL . -m 'Rebuild for libgnutls-openssl27 transition.'
>> nmu csync2_1.34-2.3 ALL . -m 'Rebuild for libgnutls-openssl27 transition.'
>> nmu freewheeling_0.6-2 ALL . -m 'Rebuild for l
On 18/06/14 19:50, Andreas Metzler wrote:
> nmu boinctui_2.3.4-1 ALL . -m 'Rebuild for libgnutls-openssl27 transition.'
> nmu csync2_1.34-2.3 ALL . -m 'Rebuild for libgnutls-openssl27 transition.'
> nmu freewheeling_0.6-2 ALL . -m 'Rebuild for libgnutls-openssl27 transition.'
> nmu gkrellm_2.3.5-6
On 2014-05-24 Andreas Metzler wrote:
> On 2014-05-24 Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> [...]
>> This seems to have migrated now. Is there anything else left to do
>> here, or can we close this now?
> Hello,
> I think there are some bin-NMUs missing, however we should wait until
> the symbol-versi
Processing control commands:
> block 726828 by 748742
Bug #726828 [release.debian.org] transition: libgnutls-openssl27
726828 was blocked by: 731605 731558 731474 731620 731561 731468 731560 731373
731171 731559 731470 731604 731467 731169
726828 was not blocking any bugs.
Added blocking bug(s) o
Control: block 726828 by 748742
On 2014-05-24 Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
[...]
> This seems to have migrated now. Is there anything else left to do
> here, or can we close this now?
Hello,
I think there are some bin-NMUs missing, however we should wait until
the symbol-versioning issue is so
Hi,
On 26/04/14 09:33, Niels Thykier wrote:
> On 2014-04-26 07:40, Andreas Metzler wrote:
>> On 2014-04-21 Andreas Metzler wrote:
>>> On 2013-10-19 Andreas Metzler wrote:
>> [...]
5. Start providing libgnutls-openssl-dev from libgnutls28-dev in sid,
stop doing so in libgnutls-dev.
>> [
On 2014-04-26 07:40, Andreas Metzler wrote:
> On 2014-04-21 Andreas Metzler wrote:
>> On 2013-10-19 Andreas Metzler wrote:
> [...]
>>> 5. Start providing libgnutls-openssl-dev from libgnutls28-dev in sid,
>>> stop doing so in libgnutls-dev.
> [...]
>
>> steps 1 to 5 are done, and gnutls28/3.2.13
On 2014-04-21 Andreas Metzler wrote:
> On 2013-10-19 Andreas Metzler wrote:
[...]
> > 5. Start providing libgnutls-openssl-dev from libgnutls28-dev in sid,
> > stop doing so in libgnutls-dev.
[...]
> steps 1 to 5 are done, and gnutls28/3.2.13-2 gnutls26/2.12.23-14
> should enter testing tomorrow
On 2013-10-19 Andreas Metzler wrote:
[...]
> I would like to provide libgnutls-openssl27 from the gnutls28 source
> package (up to date upstream version of GnuTLS). The binary package
> name will not change, however the reverse dependencies will require a
> sourceful upload to update the build-de
Andreas Metzler wrote:
[...]
> Does this plan look good? I would start submitting bug-reports against
> the rdeps, asking them to change build-deps as a next step.
[...]
ping?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition
Hello,
I would like to provide libgnutls-openssl27 from the gnutls28 source
package (up to date upstream version of GnuTLS). The binary package
name will not change, however the reverse
11 matches
Mail list logo
