Processed: Re: Bug#736846: pu: package kfreebsd-9/9.0-10+deb70.6

2014-01-30 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: tags -1 + pending Bug #736846 [release.debian.org] pu: package kfreebsd-9/9.0-10+deb70.6 Added tag(s) pending. -- 736846: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=736846 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To

Bug#736846: pu: package kfreebsd-9/9.0-10+deb70.6

2014-01-30 Thread Adam D. Barratt
Control: tags -1 + pending On Tue, 2014-01-28 at 20:47 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote: On Tue, 2014-01-28 at 03:58 +, Steven Chamberlain wrote: On 27/01/14 16:25, Adam D. Barratt wrote: The BTS metadata implies that this bug is unfixed in unstable and applicable to the package there;

Processed: Re: Bug#736846: pu: package kfreebsd-9/9.0-10+deb70.6

2014-01-28 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: tags -1 + confirmed Bug #736846 [release.debian.org] pu: package kfreebsd-9/9.0-10+deb70.6 Added tag(s) confirmed. -- 736846: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=736846 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To

Bug#736846: pu: package kfreebsd-9/9.0-10+deb70.6

2014-01-28 Thread Adam D. Barratt
Control: tags -1 + confirmed On Tue, 2014-01-28 at 03:58 +, Steven Chamberlain wrote: On 27/01/14 16:25, Adam D. Barratt wrote: The BTS metadata implies that this bug is unfixed in unstable and applicable to the package there; is that correct? Bug #736198 (ZFS lseek) was already fixed

Bug#736846: pu: package kfreebsd-9/9.0-10+deb70.6

2014-01-27 Thread Robert Millan
Package: release.debian.org User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: pu Severity: normal Hi, Please can we have your permission to update kfreebsd-9 in wheezy? -10+deb70.6 fixes a security problem and two other grave bugs: kfreebsd-9 (9.0-10+deb70.6) stable; urgency=low *

Bug#736846: pu: package kfreebsd-9/9.0-10+deb70.6

2014-01-27 Thread Adam D. Barratt
Control: tags -1 + wheezy moreinfo On 2014-01-27 15:32, Robert Millan wrote: Please can we have your permission to update kfreebsd-9 in wheezy? -10+deb70.6 fixes a security problem and two other grave bugs: kfreebsd-9 (9.0-10+deb70.6) stable; urgency=low * Disable VIA hardware RNG by

Processed: Re: Bug#736846: pu: package kfreebsd-9/9.0-10+deb70.6

2014-01-27 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: tags -1 + wheezy moreinfo Bug #736846 [release.debian.org] pu: package kfreebsd-9/9.0-10+deb70.6 Added tag(s) wheezy and moreinfo. -- 736846: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=736846 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with

Bug#736846: pu: package kfreebsd-9/9.0-10+deb70.6

2014-01-27 Thread Robert Millan
On 27/01/2014 17:25, Adam D. Barratt wrote: Control: tags -1 + wheezy moreinfo On 2014-01-27 15:32, Robert Millan wrote: Please can we have your permission to update kfreebsd-9 in wheezy? -10+deb70.6 fixes a security problem and two other grave bugs: kfreebsd-9 (9.0-10+deb70.6) stable;

Bug#736846: pu: package kfreebsd-9/9.0-10+deb70.6

2014-01-27 Thread Steven Chamberlain
On 27/01/14 21:41, Robert Millan wrote: It is fixed in kfreebsd-10. As the plan for kfreebsd-9 is to remove it after the transition to -10 is complete, we haven't made a new kfreebsd-9 upload just for this bug. The fix for this in 9.2 (and Intel Ivy Bridge as well) is so simple though, could

Processed: Re: Bug#736846: pu: package kfreebsd-9/9.0-10+deb70.6

2014-01-27 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: tags -1 - moreinfo Bug #736846 [release.debian.org] pu: package kfreebsd-9/9.0-10+deb70.6 Removed tag(s) moreinfo. -- 736846: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=736846 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To

Bug#736846: pu: package kfreebsd-9/9.0-10+deb70.6

2014-01-27 Thread Steven Chamberlain
Control: tags -1 - moreinfo On 27/01/14 16:25, Adam D. Barratt wrote: The BTS metadata implies that this bug is unfixed in unstable and applicable to the package there; is that correct? Bug #736198 (ZFS lseek) was already fixed in jessie/sid; I've just corrected the version tagging in the