On Thu, 2015-04-16 at 00:49 +0200, Stefano Rivera wrote:
Hi Adam (2015.03.28_21:09:54_+0200)
Argh, this somehow fell through the cracks again. :-(
And then I put this off for two weeks, and it's now out of date.
New revision, including the 8.0 change, but not 7.0, as discussed. Based
on
On Thu, 16 Apr 2015, Stefano Rivera wrote:
+- Correct EOL date of Debian 6.0 Squeeze to 2014-05-31.
FWIW, Debian 6 Squeeze is supported for at least 5 years (i.e. 2016-02-06) and
most likely until Wheezy is no longer supported (i.e. 2016-04-24).
cf http://wiki.debian.org/LTS
--
Raphaël
Hi Raphael,
+- Correct EOL date of Debian 6.0 Squeeze to 2014-05-31.
FWIW, Debian 6 Squeeze is supported for at least 5 years (i.e. 2016-02-06)
and most likely until Wheezy is no longer supported (i.e. 2016-04-24).
cf http://wiki.debian.org/LTS
There is an on-going confusion in the
[ Moving it to -lts to continue the discussion ]
Hi,
On Thu, 16 Apr 2015, Stuart Prescott wrote:
cf http://wiki.debian.org/LTS
There is an on-going confusion in the wider Debian community about whether
squeeze is still supported or EOL.
Where did you notice any confusion?
The
On Thu, Apr 16, 2015 at 04:02:23PM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
Yes there are packages which are unsupported in Squeeze but very much
like there are unsupported packages in Wheezy right now:
Also, all other distros with long support have some level of reduced
support over time, see for example
Hi Raphael (2015.04.16_11:00:58_+0200)
FWIW, Debian 6 Squeeze is supported for at least 5 years (i.e. 2016-02-06) and
most likely until Wheezy is no longer supported (i.e. 2016-04-24).
cf http://wiki.debian.org/LTS
We could hack that in, but we should really support LTS separately. This
is
Hi Adam (2015.03.28_21:09:54_+0200)
Argh, this somehow fell through the cracks again. :-(
And then I put this off for two weeks, and it's now out of date.
New revision, including the 8.0 change, but not 7.0, as discussed. Based
on #782668:
diff -Nru
On Thu, 2015-01-08 at 06:19 +0200, Stefano Rivera wrote:
Hi Adam (2015.01.06_22:11:55_+0200)
To summarise discussions from IRC, Julien pointed out that there are a
number of other places where we still refer to Wheezy as 7.0, including
the Release Notes and debian-installer-netboot-images.
Hi Adam (2015.01.06_22:11:55_+0200)
To summarise discussions from IRC, Julien pointed out that there are a
number of other places where we still refer to Wheezy as 7.0, including
the Release Notes and debian-installer-netboot-images. Combined with the
fact that this would be a change in
Control: tags -1 + confirmed
On Tue, 2015-01-06 at 08:35 +0200, Stefano Rivera wrote:
Hi Adam (2015.01.02_18:49:41_+0200)
Apologies for the delay in getting back to you regarding this. I think
when I previously looked at the request I assumed that we meant the
maintainers, rather than also
Processing control commands:
tags -1 + confirmed
Bug #746946 [release.debian.org] wheezy-pu: package distro-info-data/0.23~deb7u1
Added tag(s) confirmed.
--
746946: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=746946
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Hi Adam (2015.01.02_18:49:41_+0200)
Apologies for the delay in getting back to you regarding this. I think
when I previously looked at the request I assumed that we meant the
maintainers, rather than also the Release Team.
It meant everyone. But the RT have the final say, so mostly you :)
I
On Sat, 2014-11-01 at 03:02 +0200, Stefano Rivera wrote:
[...]
I'd argue that 8 would be right for Jessie and 7.0 somewhat wrong for
Wheezy, hence I'd tend to agree to the change. Stefano, where is this
used?
I don't know of anything that uses the --release flag (or that data).
Hi 746946 (2014.11.01_03:02:58_+0200)
We still need to make a decision on this bit. I've left that patch in,
for now.
Ping?
SR
--
Stefano Rivera
http://tumbleweed.org.za/
H: +27 21 461 1230 C: +27 72 419 8559
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a
Control: retitle -1 wheezy-pu: package distro-info-data/0.23~deb7u1
Oops, I dropped the ball on this, and now we have more updates to do.
I'd argue that 8 would be right for Jessie and 7.0 somewhat wrong for
Wheezy, hence I'd tend to agree to the change. Stefano, where is this
used?
I
Processing control commands:
retitle -1 wheezy-pu: package distro-info-data/0.23~deb7u1
Bug #746946 [release.debian.org] wheezy-pu: package distro-info-data/0.20~deb7u1
Changed Bug title to 'wheezy-pu: package distro-info-data/0.23~deb7u1' from
'wheezy-pu: package distro-info-data/0.20~deb7u1'
16 matches
Mail list logo
