Re: Dropping src:torque from archive? (was: Re: Bug#767411: torque: should not be released with jessie)

2016-05-31 Thread Moritz Mühlenhoff
On Sat, May 28, 2016 at 08:32:04PM +0200, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote: > Hi all, > > On Sat, Nov 01, 2014 at 08:50:05PM +0100, Moritz Mühlenhoff wrote: > > On Sat, Nov 01, 2014 at 02:30:02PM -0400, Michael Gilbert wrote: > > > On Sat, Nov 1, 2014 at 11:46 AM, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote: > > > >

Dropping src:torque from archive? (was: Re: Bug#767411: torque: should not be released with jessie)

2016-05-28 Thread Salvatore Bonaccorso
Hi all, On Sat, Nov 01, 2014 at 08:50:05PM +0100, Moritz Mühlenhoff wrote: > On Sat, Nov 01, 2014 at 02:30:02PM -0400, Michael Gilbert wrote: > > On Sat, Nov 1, 2014 at 11:46 AM, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote: > > > Given Dominique's reply on #767411, from my POV I think the best > > > solution

Re: Bug#767411: torque: should not be released with jessie

2014-11-12 Thread Salvatore Bonaccorso
Hi Julien, On Sat, Nov 01, 2014 at 07:09:04PM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote: On Sat, Nov 1, 2014 at 16:46:12 +0100, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote: Hi Julien, On Fri, Oct 31, 2014 at 02:07:25PM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote: On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 22:27:53 +0100, Salvatore Bonaccorso

Re: [Pkg-openmpi-maintainers] Bug#767411: torque: should not be released with jessie

2014-11-02 Thread M Milligan
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 I tend to agree that we shouldn't propagate an ancient unsupported branch of torque into Jesse. Also, I really wish we were having this discussion a few months ago, not the day(!) before freeze starts. But, I *strongly* disagree that we should

Re: Bug#767411: torque: should not be released with jessie

2014-11-01 Thread Salvatore Bonaccorso
Hi Julien, On Fri, Oct 31, 2014 at 02:07:25PM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote: On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 22:27:53 +0100, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote: pbs-drmaa as reverse dependency of torque is easy as it is a leaf package. The more complicated one would be openmpi which would need to drop the

Re: Bug#767411: torque: should not be released with jessie

2014-11-01 Thread Julien Cristau
On Sat, Nov 1, 2014 at 16:46:12 +0100, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote: Hi Julien, On Fri, Oct 31, 2014 at 02:07:25PM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote: On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 22:27:53 +0100, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote: pbs-drmaa as reverse dependency of torque is easy as it is a leaf

Re: Bug#767411: torque: should not be released with jessie

2014-11-01 Thread Michael Gilbert
On Sat, Nov 1, 2014 at 11:46 AM, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote: Given Dominique's reply on #767411, from my POV I think the best solution would be to remove torque completely for jessie (i.e. first drop support from openmpi to be able to remove the package and remaining reverse dependencies). 4

Re: Bug#767411: torque: should not be released with jessie

2014-11-01 Thread Moritz Mühlenhoff
On Sat, Nov 01, 2014 at 02:30:02PM -0400, Michael Gilbert wrote: On Sat, Nov 1, 2014 at 11:46 AM, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote: Given Dominique's reply on #767411, from my POV I think the best solution would be to remove torque completely for jessie (i.e. first drop support from openmpi to be

Re: Bug#767411: torque: should not be released with jessie

2014-10-31 Thread Julien Cristau
On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 22:27:53 +0100, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote: pbs-drmaa as reverse dependency of torque is easy as it is a leaf package. The more complicated one would be openmpi which would need to drop the build dependency on libtorque2-dev. The reason for this dependency was in

Bug#767411: torque: should not be released with jessie

2014-10-30 Thread Salvatore Bonaccorso
Source: torque Severity: serious Justification: end-of-life branch from upstream, low maintenance in Debian Hi I discussed this with Moritz Muehlenhoff, but bringing this now up to discussion. Note that debian-release@l.d.o and the openmpi and pbs-drmaa maintainers are X-Debbugs-CC'ed on this