Hi,
On Sun, Nov 23, 2014 at 11:19:35PM +, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
> Control: tag -1 - moreinfo
>
> On Sat, Nov 22, 2014 at 04:09:40PM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I'm on VAC and have a terrible connection. I can not do anything before
> > 3.12.
> >
> > Thanks for your pat
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 - moreinfo
Bug #767743 [release.debian.org] unblock: blitz++/0.10-3
Removed tag(s) moreinfo.
--
767743: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=767743
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
Control: tag -1 - moreinfo
On Sat, Nov 22, 2014 at 04:09:40PM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm on VAC and have a terrible connection. I can not do anything before 3.12.
>
> Thanks for your patience
I took the liberty of uploading an NMU adding the required Replaces field,
so that you
Hi,
I'm on VAC and have a terrible connection. I can not do anything before 3.12.
Thanks for your patience
Andreas.
On Fri, Nov 21, 2014 at 06:45:31PM +0100, Niels Thykier wrote:
> On 2014-11-08 22:21, intrigeri wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Andreas Tille wrote (02 Nov 2014 10:59:20 GMT) :
> >>
On 2014-11-08 22:21, intrigeri wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Andreas Tille wrote (02 Nov 2014 10:59:20 GMT) :
>> The only reason to upload this package is a missing Breaks to fix
>> bug #767564.
>
> According to
> https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=767564#15, 0.10-3
> still doesn't fix that RC
Hi,
Andreas Tille wrote (02 Nov 2014 10:59:20 GMT) :
> The only reason to upload this package is a missing Breaks to fix
> bug #767564.
According to
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=767564#15, 0.10-3
still doesn't fix that RC bug.
Cheers,
--
intrigeri
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
Hi Andreas,
On Sun, Nov 02, 2014 at 09:26:09PM +0100, Andreas Barth wrote:
> * Andreas Tille (andr...@fam-tille.de) [141102 21:20]:
> > could you please follow what was suggested here
> >
> >https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=767291#15
> >
* Andreas Tille (andr...@fam-tille.de) [141102 21:20]:
> could you please follow what was suggested here
>
>https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=767291#15
>
>
?
Thanks a lot
Andreas.
- Forwarded message from Julien Cristau -
Date: Sun, 2 Nov 2014 14:37:38 +0100
From: Julien Cristau
To: Andreas Tille , 767...@bugs.debian.org
Cc: debian-m...@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Bug#767743: unblock: blitz++/0.10-3
On Sun, Nov 2, 2014 at 13:52:00
Hi Julien,
On Sun, Nov 02, 2014 at 02:17:16PM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 2, 2014 at 12:39:07 +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
>
> > Ahhh, well. I confirm that the 0.10-2 changes need to be taken into
> > consideration now as well. I admit I do not have any personal interest
> > in b
On Sun, Nov 2, 2014 at 13:52:00 +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Hi Mips porters,
>
> according to
>
> https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=767291#15
>
> blitz++ perfectly builds on mips provided that the build host is
> accordingly equipped. Could you please, pretty please mak
On Sun, Nov 2, 2014 at 12:39:07 +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Ahhh, well. I confirm that the 0.10-2 changes need to be taken into
> consideration now as well. I admit I do not have any personal interest
> in blitz++. The only reason why I spent some time into it was that
> years ago somebody a
Hi Mips porters,
according to
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=767291#15
blitz++ perfectly builds on mips provided that the build host is
accordingly equipped. Could you please, pretty please make sure
that the build of the latest upload will not fail?
Thanks a lot
On 2014-11-02 13:28, Niels Thykier wrote:
>
> [...]
>
> Assuming the mips builds comes through before the 5th of November,
> blitz++ can migrate on its own.
>
> ~Niels
>
>
Bah, obviously I missed the upload today. Provided that the mips build
gets sorted out before the 5th of November, I am
On 2014-11-02 12:39, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Hi Niels,
>
> On Sun, Nov 02, 2014 at 12:13:17PM +0100, Niels Thykier wrote:
>> Control: tags -1 moreinfo
>>
>> Unfortunately blitz++ does not build on mips, so an unblock does not
>> help.
>
> Sorry, that's not true. According to
>
>https://bugs
Hi Niels,
On Sun, Nov 02, 2014 at 12:13:17PM +0100, Niels Thykier wrote:
> Control: tags -1 moreinfo
>
> Unfortunately blitz++ does not build on mips, so an unblock does not
> help.
Sorry, that's not true. According to
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=767291#15
it builds o
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 moreinfo
Bug #767743 [release.debian.org] unblock: blitz++/0.10-3
Added tag(s) moreinfo.
--
767743: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=767743
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
On 2014-11-02 11:59, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: unblock
>
> Please unblock package blitz++
>
> The only reason to upload this package is a missing Breaks to fix bug #76
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package blitz++
The only reason to upload this package is a missing Breaks to fix bug #767564.
Debdiff is attached.
Thanks for your work in the release team
Andreas.
19 matches
Mail list logo
