Bug#774211: freeze exception for binutils 2.25-3

2015-02-25 Thread Matthias Klose
On 02/25/2015 07:57 AM, Niels Thykier wrote: On 2015-02-25 07:53, Matthias Klose wrote: On 02/23/2015 10:29 PM, Niels Thykier wrote: Control: tags -1 moreinfo On 2014-12-30 12:29, Matthias Klose wrote: forgot to mention that there are no regression in the binutils testsuite on all release

Bug#774211: freeze exception for binutils 2.25-3

2015-02-24 Thread Niels Thykier
On 2015-02-25 07:53, Matthias Klose wrote: On 02/23/2015 10:29 PM, Niels Thykier wrote: Control: tags -1 moreinfo On 2014-12-30 12:29, Matthias Klose wrote: forgot to mention that there are no regression in the binutils testsuite on all release architectures, and that there are no

Bug#774211: freeze exception for binutils 2.25-3

2015-02-24 Thread Matthias Klose
On 02/23/2015 10:29 PM, Niels Thykier wrote: Control: tags -1 moreinfo On 2014-12-30 12:29, Matthias Klose wrote: forgot to mention that there are no regression in the binutils testsuite on all release architectures, and that there are no regression in the gcc-4.8 and gcc-4.9 testsuites

Bug#774211: freeze exception for binutils 2.25-3

2015-02-11 Thread Luciano Bello
Hi guys, https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17512 is still growing, and porting all the patches to 2.24.90.20141023-1 is getting less and less trivial. If you short the distance with the upstream version, that will put a lot of work of the security-team off :) Thanks for your

Bug#774211: freeze exception for binutils 2.25-3

2015-01-26 Thread Moritz Mühlenhoff
On Tue, Dec 30, 2014 at 12:29:35PM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote: forgot to mention that there are no regression in the binutils testsuite on all release architectures, and that there are no regression in the gcc-4.8 and gcc-4.9 testsuites on all release architectures. Did someone from the

Bug#774211: freeze exception for binutils 2.25-3

2015-01-16 Thread Matthias Klose
On 12/30/2014 01:43 PM, Matthias Klose wrote: On 12/30/2014 01:27 PM, Alexander Cherepanov wrote: On 2014-12-30 14:05, Matthias Klose wrote: - several fixes for CVE issues, the security team asked to include these into jessie. - CVE-2014-8484 (PR binutils/17509). -

Bug#774211: freeze exception for binutils 2.25-3

2014-12-30 Thread Matthias Klose
Package: release.debian.org Tags: sid jessie please grant a freeze exception for binutils 2.25-3 in jessie. The current version in jessie is built from the 2.25 release branch, and this update would move the final 2.25 into jessie. The package probably has more changes than needed, otoh it fixes

Bug#774211: freeze exception for binutils 2.25-3

2014-12-30 Thread Matthias Klose
forgot to mention that there are no regression in the binutils testsuite on all release architectures, and that there are no regression in the gcc-4.8 and gcc-4.9 testsuites on all release architectures. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of

Bug#774211: freeze exception for binutils 2.25-3

2014-12-30 Thread Alexander Cherepanov
On 2014-12-30 14:05, Matthias Klose wrote: - several fixes for CVE issues, the security team asked to include these into jessie. - CVE-2014-8484 (PR binutils/17509). - CVE-2014-8485, CVE-2014-8504 (PR binutils/17510). - CVE-2014-8501, CVE-2014-8502, CVE-2014-8503 (PR

Bug#774211: freeze exception for binutils 2.25-3

2014-12-30 Thread Matthias Klose
On 12/30/2014 01:27 PM, Alexander Cherepanov wrote: On 2014-12-30 14:05, Matthias Klose wrote: - several fixes for CVE issues, the security team asked to include these into jessie. - CVE-2014-8484 (PR binutils/17509). - CVE-2014-8485, CVE-2014-8504 (PR binutils/17510). -