binNMUs for some recent maintainer uploads that were built against
netcdf preating the source package split:
(adding i386 for ma:same packages)
nmu ferret-vis_6.9.3-3 . amd64 . "Rebuild against the split netcdf sources."
nmu magics++_2.24.7-7 . amd64 i386 . "Rebuild against the split netcdf
On 25-08-15 15:33, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
For the netcdf-c transition only the following packages still need
rebuild in unstable:
[...]
python-scientific (2.9.4-3)
The build failures caused by the incompatibility with NumPy = 1.9 are a
known issue upstream:
On 28-08-15 10:21, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Tue, Aug 25, 2015 at 15:33:10 +0200, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
dx(1:4.4.4-7)
grace (1:5.1.25-1)
gri (2.12.23-9)
kst (2.0.3-4)[also needed for netcdf-cxx-legacy]
octave-octcdf
On Fri, Aug 28, 2015 at 10:30:43 +0200, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
gri (2.12.23-9) doesn't need any binNMU for netcdf anymore as mentioned
in my previous message, the new upload by the maintainer already built
with the new netcdf packages on the buildds, only the maintainer build
on i386
On Tue, Aug 25, 2015 at 15:33:10 +0200, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
dx(1:4.4.4-7)
grace (1:5.1.25-1)
gri (2.12.23-9)
kst (2.0.3-4)[also needed for netcdf-cxx-legacy]
octave-octcdf (1.1.8-1)
python-scientific (2.9.4-3)
On 25-08-15 15:33, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
For the netcdf-c transition only the following packages still need
rebuild in unstable:
dx(1:4.4.4-7)
gnudatalanguage (0.9.5-2)[BD-Uninstallable]
grace (1:5.1.25-1)
gri (2.12.23-9)
kst
On 20-08-15 00:11, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
On 19-08-15 20:01, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?tag=netcdf-split-c-f-cxx;users=debian-...@lists.debian.org
We mostly need BinNMUs for the other packages in dependency level 1 now.
This includes gdal
On 19-08-15 22:06, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 18:34:03 +0200, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
The automatically created auto-netcdf tracker is not sufficient to track
the new C++ Fortran packages. I've attached the ben configuration I
used for my pkg-grass-transitions tracker
On 20-08-15 00:11, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
On 19-08-15 20:01, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
Everything except vtk from dependency level 1 in the netcdf transition
has been NMUed to DELAYED/2:
#793885 minc (2.2.00-6.1)
The minc NMU has been cancelled on request of the
On 01-08-15 03:09, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
On 30-07-15 18:34, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?tag=netcdf-split-c-f-cxx;users=debian-...@lists.debian.org
With the recent updates to the netcdf packages in experimental we should
be ready for the
On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 18:34:03 +0200, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
The automatically created auto-netcdf tracker is not sufficient to track
the new C++ Fortran packages. I've attached the ben configuration I
used for my pkg-grass-transitions tracker in the preparation of this
transition.
On Thu, Aug 20, 2015 at 00:11:07 +0200, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
We mostly need BinNMUs for the other packages in dependency level 1 now.
This includes gdal which has it's own upcoming transition #756867, I'd
like to start that transition soon.
Alright, go ahead.
Cheers,
Julien
On 19-08-15 20:01, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
We still need the updated transition tracker, but in the mean time my
(manually updated) test tracker can be used:
http://linuxminded.nl/tmp/pkg-grass-transitions/html/netcdf.html
I'll NMU to DELAYED/2 all packages with patches for
On Sat, Aug 1, 2015 at 03:09:54 +0200, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
To not require the build dependency changes for the netcdf-cxx-legacy
and netcdf-fortran -dev packages, we should consider having
libnetcdf-dev recommend the language specific -dev packages.
Recommends are not going to
Processing control commands:
tags -1 patch
Bug #791215 [release.debian.org] netcdf: library transition may be needed when
GCC 5 is the default
Added tag(s) patch.
--
791215: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=791215
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with
Control: tags -1 patch
On 30-07-15 18:34, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?tag=netcdf-split-c-f-cxx;users=debian-...@lists.debian.org
We're still not quite ready for the netcdf transition, but I'd like to
formally request the transition already
user release.debian@packages.debian.org
usertag 791215 + transition
block 791215 by 790756
reassign 791215 release.debian.org
block 791215 by 793823 793877 793885 793920 793976 794010
block 791215 by 794027 794040 793891 793902 793882
thanks
On 25-07-15 13:10, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
On
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
user release.debian@packages.debian.org
Setting user to release.debian@packages.debian.org (was sebas...@xs4all.nl).
usertag 791215 + transition
There were no usertags set.
Usertags are now: transition.
block 791215 by 790756
Bug #791215
18 matches
Mail list logo
