On 2015-09-11 21:27, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> Hi Mattia,
>
> On 2015-09-11 21:19, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
>> The syntax of `wb nmu` changed recently:
>> https://lists.debian.org/1439491428-32676-1-git-send-email-aurel...@aurel32.net
>> from ALL you need to specify ANY to select all architectures.
>
Hi Mattia,
On 2015-09-11 21:19, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
> The syntax of `wb nmu` changed recently:
> https://lists.debian.org/1439491428-32676-1-git-send-email-aurel...@aurel32.net
> from ALL you need to specify ANY to select all architectures.
Good to know. This needs to be fixed in reportbug, too
Hi Andreas!
let me sneak into a RT bug just to make you aware of a little thing:
On Fri, Sep 11, 2015 at 08:43:39PM +0200, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> nmu imagemagick_8:6.9.1.2-1 . ALL . experimental . -m "Rebuild against
> libopenexr6v5"
The syntax of `wb nmu` changed recently:
https://lists.deb
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
Tags: experimental
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu
Some binNMUs for experimental related to the libstdc++v5 transition in
sid. These packages have finished their GCC 5 transition (usually just a
rebuild) and migrated to tes
4 matches
Mail list logo