Bug#841733: Transition Opencv 3.1

2017-10-15 Thread Nobuhiro Iwamatsu
Hi, 2017-10-14 4:45 GMT+09:00 Mattia Rizzolo : > On Fri, Oct 13, 2017 at 07:09:52PM +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: >> Alright, let's go ahead with this, now that gdal is done. > > \o/ > > Uploaded, and started to build. Thanks! > > I've also raised all the remaining

Bug#841733: Transition Opencv 3.1

2017-10-13 Thread Mattia Rizzolo
On Fri, Oct 13, 2017 at 07:09:52PM +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > Alright, let's go ahead with this, now that gdal is done. \o/ Uploaded, and started to build. I've also raised all the remaining bug to RC, and poked them (also to get the needed sourceful uploads sorted). -- regards,

Processed: Re: Bug#841733: Transition Opencv 3.1

2017-10-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tags -1 = confirmed Bug #841733 [release.debian.org] transition: opencv Added tag(s) confirmed. -- 841733: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=841733 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Bug#841733: Transition Opencv 3.1

2017-10-13 Thread Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
Control: tags -1 = confirmed On 04/10/17 16:42, Mattia Rizzolo wrote: > On Wed, Sep 13, 2017 at 06:53:37PM +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: >> What's the status of this? > > Stalled, but I think we are ready to go right now. > > Last week I tried rebuilding all reverse dependencies listed

Bug#841733: Transition Opencv 3.1

2017-10-04 Thread Mattia Rizzolo
On Wed, Sep 13, 2017 at 06:53:37PM +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > What's the status of this? Stalled, but I think we are ready to go right now. Last week I tried rebuilding all reverse dependencies listed in the transition tracker, excluding sid-only packages (that we don't care much

Bug#841733: Transition Opencv 3.1

2017-09-19 Thread Nobuhiro Iwamatsu
Hi, 2017-09-19 17:55 GMT+09:00 Mattia Rizzolo : > On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 12:37:54PM +0900, Nobuhiro Iwamatsu wrote: >> The following packages can be migrated with OpenCV 3.2: > > I should check again whether something changed since I last did my > rebuild in July, but: > >>

Bug#841733: Transition Opencv 3.1

2017-09-19 Thread Mattia Rizzolo
On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 12:37:54PM +0900, Nobuhiro Iwamatsu wrote: > The following packages can be migrated with OpenCV 3.2: I should check again whether something changed since I last did my rebuild in July, but: > freecad this is not involved in the transition afaik > ros-opencv-apps this

Bug#841733: Transition Opencv 3.1

2017-09-18 Thread Nobuhiro Iwamatsu
Hi, Sorry, reply is too late. 2017-09-14 1:53 GMT+09:00 Emilio Pozuelo Monfort : > On Sat, 15 Jul 2017 09:41:43 +0200 Emilio Pozuelo Monfort > wrote: >> On 15/07/17 00:51, Mattia Rizzolo wrote: >> > On Fri, Jul 14, 2017 at 11:16:23AM +0200, Mattia Rizzolo

Bug#841733: Transition Opencv 3.1

2017-09-13 Thread Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
On Sat, 15 Jul 2017 09:41:43 +0200 Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > On 15/07/17 00:51, Mattia Rizzolo wrote: > > On Fri, Jul 14, 2017 at 11:16:23AM +0200, Mattia Rizzolo wrote: > >> But in the meantime OpenCV 3.2 went out, so we'd like to go for that. > >> It has been accepted

Bug#841733: Transition Opencv 3.1

2017-07-15 Thread Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
On 15/07/17 00:51, Mattia Rizzolo wrote: > On Fri, Jul 14, 2017 at 11:16:23AM +0200, Mattia Rizzolo wrote: >> But in the meantime OpenCV 3.2 went out, so we'd like to go for that. >> It has been accepted into experimental a few days ago, and afaik nobody >> test rebuilt things with it. > > Indeed

Bug#841733: Transition Opencv 3.1

2017-07-14 Thread Mattia Rizzolo
On Fri, Jul 14, 2017 at 11:16:23AM +0200, Mattia Rizzolo wrote: > But in the meantime OpenCV 3.2 went out, so we'd like to go for that. > It has been accepted into experimental a few days ago, and afaik nobody > test rebuilt things with it. Indeed my test rebuilds highlighted new failures… In

Bug#841733: Transition Opencv 3.1

2017-07-14 Thread Mattia Rizzolo
On Fri, Jul 14, 2017 at 09:54:07AM +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > I see three remaining blocker bugs: > > mldemos: no fix, but no rdeps: could be removed from testing this is already out of testing… > libkf5kface: has patches > digikam: just needs to toggle a flag > > Is that correct?

Bug#841733: Transition Opencv 3.1

2017-07-14 Thread Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
On 22/10/16 23:19, Nobuhiro Iwamatsu wrote: > Package: release.debian.org > Severity: normal > User: release.debian@packages.debian.org > Usertags: transition > > Hi, > > I want to upload the opencv 3.1 to unstable. This is changed API and > soname and remove > oobsolete library from 2.4.x,

Bug#841733: Transition Opencv 3.1

2016-11-08 Thread Nobuhiro Iwamatsu
Hi, I update situation of opencv. 2016-10-23 6:19 GMT+09:00 Nobuhiro Iwamatsu : > Package: release.debian.org > Severity: normal > User: release.debian@packages.debian.org > Usertags: transition > > Hi, > > I want to upload the opencv 3.1 to unstable. This is changed

Processed: Re: Bug#841733: Transition Opencv 3.1

2016-10-30 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > block 841733 with 841245 841245 841412 841407 841246 841413 841406 812032 > 841370 841246 841408 841246 841409 841405 841416 841410 841287 841411 Bug #841733 [release.debian.org] Transition Opencv 3.1 841733 was not blocked by any bugs. 841733

Bug#841733: Transition Opencv 3.1

2016-10-22 Thread Nobuhiro Iwamatsu
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: transition Hi, I want to upload the opencv 3.1 to unstable. This is changed API and soname and remove oobsolete library from 2.4.x, some of the packages that depend on this is the need to change.