Control: tags -1 + pending
On Tue, 2017-09-26 at 01:11 -0400, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
> On Sat 2017-09-23 19:46:42 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > On Wed, 2017-09-20 at 23:07 -0400, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
> > > I've built this against a stretch system and tested it on a
> > > stretch
> >
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 + pending
Bug #863734 [release.debian.org] stretch-pu: gnupg2
Added tag(s) pending.
--
863734: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=863734
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
On Sat 2017-09-23 19:46:42 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On Wed, 2017-09-20 at 23:07 -0400, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
>> I've built this against a stretch system and tested it on a stretch
>> system, and it still works.
>>
>> Please advise me whether i should make an upload.
>
> With a slightly
On 17-09-23 19:46:42, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On Wed, 2017-09-20 at 23:07 -0400, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
> >
> > [...]
> >
> > I've built this against a stretch system and tested it on a stretch
> > system, and it still works.
> >
> > Please advise me whether i should make an upload.
> >
>
Control: tags -1 +confirmed -moreinfo
On Wed, 2017-09-20 at 23:07 -0400, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
> On Wed 2017-09-20 23:37:27 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > To save digging them out:
> >
> >
> > I'm assuming that there haven't been any relevant regressions or
> > follow-up fixes since the
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 +confirmed -moreinfo
Bug #863734 [release.debian.org] stretch-pu: gnupg2
Added tag(s) confirmed.
Bug #863734 [release.debian.org] stretch-pu: gnupg2
Removed tag(s) moreinfo.
--
863734: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=863734
Debian Bug Trac
On Thu, 2017-09-21 at 00:24 +0200, Georg Faerber wrote:
> On 17-07-15 23:29:09, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> > Adam D. Barratt (2017-07-13):
> > > Finally, unless I missed one when checking back through the
> > > thread, we
> > > also need a d-i ack.
> >
> > From a few quick tests, spotted no issues
On 17-07-15 23:29:09, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Adam D. Barratt (2017-07-13):
> > Finally, unless I missed one when checking back through the thread, we
> > also need a d-i ack.
>
> From a few quick tests, spotted no issues in d-i.
So...any chance of getting this into 9.2?
Thanks & cheers,
Georg
Adam D. Barratt (2017-07-13):
> Finally, unless I missed one when checking back through the thread, we
> also need a d-i ack.
From a few quick tests, spotted no issues in d-i.
KiBi.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Tue, 2017-07-11 at 11:16 -0400, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
> On Sun 2017-06-25 18:39:34 -0400, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
> > On Sat 2017-06-17 17:36:39 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> >> Unfortunately we ran out of time to handle this before the release, so
> >> converting it to a proto-p-u req
On Sun 2017-06-25 18:39:34 -0400, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
> On Sat 2017-06-17 17:36:39 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
>> Unfortunately we ran out of time to handle this before the release, so
>> converting it to a proto-p-u request.
>
> Thanks for this conversion, Adam. Please let me know if you
On Sat 2017-06-17 17:36:39 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> retitle 863734 stretch-pu: gnupg2
> user release.debian@packages.debian.org
> usertags 863734 = pu
> tags 863734 = stretch moreinfo
> thanks
>
> On Sat, 2017-06-03 at 15:31 +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
>> Daniel Kahn Gillmor (2017-06-
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> retitle 863734 stretch-pu: gnupg2
Bug #863734 [release.debian.org] unblock: gnupg2/2.1.18-8
Changed Bug title to 'stretch-pu: gnupg2' from 'unblock: gnupg2/2.1.18-8'.
> user release.debian@packages.debian.org
Setting user to release.debian
retitle 863734 stretch-pu: gnupg2
user release.debian@packages.debian.org
usertags 863734 = pu
tags 863734 = stretch moreinfo
thanks
On Sat, 2017-06-03 at 15:31 +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Daniel Kahn Gillmor (2017-06-03):
> > Ping on the unblock request for gnupg2/2.1.18-8 -- i've heard
Daniel Kahn Gillmor (2017-06-03):
> Ping on the unblock request for gnupg2/2.1.18-8 -- i've heard from
> several people that this version of the package is better for them in
> stretch than 2.1.18-6, and i'm getting concerned about tht timing.
>
> sorry for the nudge,
>
> --dkg
Well I had
Ping on the unblock request for gnupg2/2.1.18-8 -- i've heard from
several people that this version of the package is better for them in
stretch than 2.1.18-6, and i'm getting concerned about tht timing.
sorry for the nudge,
--dkg
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Tue 2017-05-30 22:48:20 +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Jonathan Wiltshire (2017-05-30):
>> Control: tag -1 moreinfo
>>
>> On Tue, May 30, 2017 at 12:41:48PM -0400, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
>> > Please unblock package gnupg2
>> >
>> > The gnupg2 source package 2.1.18-8 contains a significan
Jonathan Wiltshire (2017-05-30):
> Control: tag -1 moreinfo
>
> On Tue, May 30, 2017 at 12:41:48PM -0400, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
> > Please unblock package gnupg2
> >
> > The gnupg2 source package 2.1.18-8 contains a significant number of
> > useful fixes from 2.1.18-6, and should be propaga
Control: tag -1 moreinfo
On Tue, May 30, 2017 at 12:41:48PM -0400, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
> Please unblock package gnupg2
>
> The gnupg2 source package 2.1.18-8 contains a significant number of
> useful fixes from 2.1.18-6, and should be propagated into testing.
Cc-ing the d-i RM for an ack.
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 moreinfo
Bug #863734 [release.debian.org] unblock: gnupg2/2.1.18-8
Added tag(s) moreinfo.
--
863734: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=863734
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
20 matches
Mail list logo
