Bug#866045: let this be for 1.5-13+deb9u1

Control: tags -1 + pending On Tue, 2017-08-22 at 21:44 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > Control: tags -1 + confirmed > > On Mon, 2017-07-03 at 00:02 +0200, Santiago Garcia Mantinan wrote: > > +bridge-utils (1.5-13+deb9u1) stretch; urgency=low > > + > > + * Fix a problem with some vlan interfaces

Processed: Re: Bug#866045: let this be for 1.5-13+deb9u1

Processing control commands: > tags -1 + pending Bug #866045 [release.debian.org] stretch-pu: package bridge-utils/1.5-14 Added tag(s) pending. -- 866045: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=866045 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Processed: Re: Bug#866045: let this be for 1.5-13+deb9u1

Processing control commands: > tags -1 + confirmed Bug #866045 [release.debian.org] stretch-pu: package bridge-utils/1.5-14 Added tag(s) confirmed. -- 866045: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=866045 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Bug#866045: let this be for 1.5-13+deb9u1

Control: tags -1 + confirmed On Mon, 2017-07-03 at 00:02 +0200, Santiago Garcia Mantinan wrote: > +bridge-utils (1.5-13+deb9u1) stretch; urgency=low > + > + * Fix a problem with some vlan interfaces not being created. > +Closes: #866687. [...] > Will this be ok for an upload? Yes, thanks. >

Bug#866045: let this be for 1.5-13+deb9u1

Hi! We've already missed 9.1 with this fix, I left some questions here last time... > Will this be ok for an upload? > > If so... when should I upload it? > > Will a normal dput work given the stretch target on the changelog, or should > I do something special? Can we try to make this into 9.2

Bug#866045: let this be for 1.5-13+deb9u1

Hi! So, following kibi's advice I've reported the bug and here is the new full patch. diff -ru bridge-utils-1.5-13/debian/bridge-utils.sh bridge-utils-1.5-13+deb9u1/debian/bridge-utils.sh --- bridge-utils-1.5-13/debian/bridge-utils.sh 2017-07-02 23:27:55.0 +0200 +++ bridge-utils-1.5-13