Bug#915721: transition: opencv

2019-10-16 Thread Mo Zhou
On 2019-10-10 11:03, Paul Gevers wrote: > Although the tracker doesn't show any collision, I'd like to finish the > perl transition first. Please go ahead when perl 5.30 migrates to > testing. Once uploaded raise the severity of all those FTBFS bugs. opencv 4.1.2 has landed onto unstable. The

Processed: Re: Bug#915721: transition: opencv

2019-10-11 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > block -1 by 915708 Bug #915721 [release.debian.org] transition: opencv 915721 was blocked by: 922590 922584 922589 922574 922566 922570 922579 922586 922591 922600 922573 922592 922597 922595 922569 922583 922593 922585 922588 922587 922582 922578 922596 915721

Bug#915721: transition: opencv

2019-10-11 Thread Mo Zhou
Control: block -1 by 915708 Control: block -1 by 915711 Control: block -1 by 915712 On 2019-10-10 11:03, Paul Gevers wrote: >>> AFAIK opencv 3.x -> 4.x breaks nearly all the reverse dependencies, due >>> to >>> API changes or header path change. >>> I have already filed FTBFS bugs against those

Bug#915721: transition: opencv

2019-10-10 Thread Paul Gevers
Control: block -1 by 922566 Control: block -1 by 922569 Control: block -1 by 922570 Control: block -1 by 922573 Control: block -1 by 922574 Control: block -1 by 922578 Control: block -1 by 922579 Control: block -1 by 922582 Control: block -1 by 922583 Control: block -1 by 922584 Control: block -1

Processed: Re: Bug#915721: transition: opencv

2019-10-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > block -1 by 922566 Bug #915721 [release.debian.org] transition: opencv 915721 was not blocked by any bugs. 915721 was not blocking any bugs. Added blocking bug(s) of 915721: 922566 > block -1 by 922569 Bug #915721 [release.debian.org] transition: opencv 915721 was

Bug#915721: transition: opencv

2019-10-09 Thread Mo Zhou
ping? On 2019-09-30 09:02, Mo Zhou wrote: > Hi release team, > > Shall we proceed with the opencv transition? The opencv 3.2.0 in > unstable > is too ancient. The automatically generated ben file looks good: > > https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-opencv.html > > I'm planning to

Bug#915721: transition: opencv

2019-09-30 Thread Mo Zhou
Hi release team, Shall we proceed with the opencv transition? The opencv 3.2.0 in unstable is too ancient. The automatically generated ben file looks good: https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-opencv.html I'm planning to remove the mipsel architecture since it suffers a lot from OOM

Bug#915721: transition: opencv

2019-01-14 Thread Mo Zhou
On Sun, Jan 13, 2019 at 08:06:57PM +0100, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > > What is the status with the rdeps? I looked at two bugs and they worry me: I haven't had enough time to test rdeps for another round. But I guess the situation would be similar to the first round. > #915544 suggests the

Bug#915721: transition: opencv

2019-01-13 Thread Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
On 06/01/2019 05:46, Mo Zhou wrote: > Hi, > > Any updates? Transition freeze is close. The current version of OpenCV > (3.2.0) in Sid is quite ancient (Dec 23, 2016). > > mips{,64}el buildd are again lagging behind the other architectures for > the last binNMU. And before any ack I'm not going

Bug#915721: transition: opencv

2019-01-13 Thread M. Zhou
Hi pochu, To make things explicit, do I still have chance to continue with the opencv transition after the gdal one? And do I need to apply for freeze exception for opencv?

Bug#915721: transition: opencv

2019-01-05 Thread Mo Zhou
Hi, Any updates? Transition freeze is close. The current version of OpenCV (3.2.0) in Sid is quite ancient (Dec 23, 2016). mips{,64}el buildd are again lagging behind the other architectures for the last binNMU. And before any ack I'm not going to manually build it again on mips box since I'm

Bug#915721: transition: opencv

2018-12-31 Thread Mo Zhou
I've uploaded opencv 3.4.5 to experimental which fixed some issues found in the previous version. This time mipsel and mips64el is still lagging behind other other architectures. I'll build binaries by myself for the two architectures and I don't expect any buiid failure. 3.4.5 Will be green on

Bug#915721: transition: opencv

2018-12-27 Thread Mo Zhou
OpenCV 3.4.4 is green on all official architectures after uploading manually built mips{,64}el packages by using Yunqiang's machine. Shall we move on? On Mon, Dec 24, 2018 at 01:49:45AM +, Mo Zhou wrote: > On Wed, Dec 19, 2018 at 11:32:36AM +0100, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > > I was

Bug#915721: transition: opencv

2018-12-23 Thread Mo Zhou
On Wed, Dec 19, 2018 at 11:32:36AM +0100, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > I was going to ack this, but I noticed that opencv failed to build on some > architectures: > > https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=opencv=experimental > > Please look at that before we start this. opencv was

Bug#915721: transition: opencv

2018-12-19 Thread Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
On 06/12/2018 13:09, Mo Zhou wrote: > Package: release.debian.org > Severity: normal > User: release.debian@packages.debian.org > Usertags: transition > > opencv 3.4.4 introduced new features, bug fixes including CVE fixes. > I'd like to request for a transition slot. > > The rebuild for all

Bug#915721: transition: opencv

2018-12-06 Thread Mo Zhou
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: transition opencv 3.4.4 introduced new features, bug fixes including CVE fixes. I'd like to request for a transition slot. The rebuild for all reverse build depends has been done locally, and here