Your message dated Sat, 24 Aug 2019 11:03:14 +0200 with message-id <91e28875-132a-e721-ce72-8510c1245...@debian.org> and subject line Re: nmu: Please binNMU the following packages that have not been built on a buildd has caused the Debian Bug report #932702, regarding nmu: Please binNMU the following packages that have not been built on a buildd to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 932702: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=932702 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian....@packages.debian.org Usertags: binnmu Hello, So apparently I missed the memo and my first round of packages uploaded to unstable after the release have not been built on a buildd. Could it be possible to binNMU them? libsepol must probably be rebuilt first as other packages are statically linking against it and are adding a Built-Using field: nmu libsepol_2.9-2 . amd64 . unstable . -m "Rebuilt on a buildd" nmu checkpolicy_2.9-2 . amd64 . unstable . -m "Rebuilt on a buildd" nmu libselinux_2.9-2 . amd64 . unstable . -m "Rebuilt on a buildd" nmu mcstrans_2.9-2 . amd64 . unstable . -m "Rebuilt on a buildd" nmu policycoreutils_2.9-2 . amd64 . unstable . -m "Rebuilt on a buildd" nmu restorecond_2.9-2 . amd64 . unstable . -m "Rebuilt on a buildd" nmu semodule-utils_2.9-2 . amd64 . unstable . -m "Rebuilt on a buildd" nmu setools_4.2.2-1 . amd64 . unstable . -m "Rebuilt on a buildd" nmu deja-dup_40.1-1 . amd64 . unstable . -m "Rebuilt on a buildd" Kind regards, Laurent Bigonville -- System Information: Debian Release: bullseye/sid APT prefers unstable-debug APT policy: (500, 'unstable-debug'), (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental-debug'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Foreign Architectures: i386 Kernel: Linux 4.19.0-5-amd64 (SMP w/8 CPU cores) Kernel taint flags: TAINT_FIRMWARE_WORKAROUND Locale: LANG=fr_BE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_BE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8), LANGUAGE=fr_BE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /usr/bin/dash Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system) LSM: SELinux: enabled - Mode: Permissive - Policy name: refpolicy
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---Hi Laurent, On Mon, 22 Jul 2019 02:13:38 +0200 Laurent Bigonville <bi...@debian.org> wrote: > Could it be possible to binNMU them? > > libsepol must probably be rebuilt first as other packages are statically > linking against it and are adding a Built-Using field: > nmu libsepol_2.9-2 . amd64 . unstable . -m "Rebuilt on a buildd" > > nmu checkpolicy_2.9-2 . amd64 . unstable . -m "Rebuilt on a buildd" > nmu libselinux_2.9-2 . amd64 . unstable . -m "Rebuilt on a buildd" > nmu mcstrans_2.9-2 . amd64 . unstable . -m "Rebuilt on a buildd" I checked till here. This was all done two weeks ago. > nmu policycoreutils_2.9-2 . amd64 . unstable . -m "Rebuilt on a buildd" > nmu restorecond_2.9-2 . amd64 . unstable . -m "Rebuilt on a buildd" > nmu semodule-utils_2.9-2 . amd64 . unstable . -m "Rebuilt on a buildd" > nmu setools_4.2.2-1 . amd64 . unstable . -m "Rebuilt on a buildd" > > nmu deja-dup_40.1-1 . amd64 . unstable . -m "Rebuilt on a buildd" I assume the rest was done as well. Paulsignature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
--- End Message ---