Bug#941713: buster-pu: package ntpsec/1.1.3+dfsg1-2+deb10u1

2019-11-17 Thread Richard Laager
In the time since I created the original .debdiff, I have moved the ntpsec packaging from GitHub to Salsa and switched to DEP-14 branch naming. Attached is a refreshed .debdiff.2 and an .interdiff comparing that to the first .debdiff. The only changes are the Vcs-* and debian/gbp.conf changes rela

Bug#941713: buster-pu: package ntpsec/1.1.3+dfsg1-2+deb10u1

2019-11-08 Thread Adam D. Barratt
Control: tags -1 + confirmed On Fri, 2019-10-04 at 00:54 -0500, Richard Laager wrote: > This is my first time with the Debian proposed update process (though > I have done my own Ubuntu SRU once), so please bear with me and let > me know if I've done anything wrong. Seems OK to me. :-) > The deb

Processed: Re: Bug#941713: buster-pu: package ntpsec/1.1.3+dfsg1-2+deb10u1

2019-11-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tags -1 + confirmed Bug #941713 [release.debian.org] buster-pu: package ntpsec/1.1.3+dfsg1-2+deb10u1 Added tag(s) confirmed. -- 941713: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=941713 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Bug#941713: buster-pu: package ntpsec/1.1.3+dfsg1-2+deb10u1

2019-10-03 Thread Richard Laager
Subject: buster-pu: package ntpsec/1.1.3+dfsg1-2+deb10u1 Package: release.debian.org User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: pu Tags: buster Severity: normal This is my first time with the Debian proposed update process (though I have done my own Ubuntu SRU once), so please bear wit