Hi,
On Fri, Oct 25, 2019 at 06:33:13PM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 25, 2019 at 06:25:43PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> > [...] -12 was uploaded on Oct 23, but you say
> > that the tests started failing on Oct 21.
>
> No, the submitter did which clearly was wrong. Please read the
Hi,
On Fri, Oct 25, 2019 at 06:25:43PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> [...] -12 was uploaded on Oct 23, but you say
> that the tests started failing on Oct 21.
No, the submitter did which clearly was wrong. Please read the bug,
I said that at my very first message.
> So why do you think this is
On 25.10.19 18:09, Rene Engelhard wrote:
Hi,
On Fri, Oct 25, 2019 at 05:59:53PM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote:
OK, thanks, reassigning to src:gcc-9 (libstdc++6 for now) then.
no. based on what rationale?
And to prevent said gcc-9 version from migrating, to not break something
else (no idea
Hi,
On Fri, Oct 25, 2019 at 05:59:53PM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> > > OK, thanks, reassigning to src:gcc-9 (libstdc++6 for now) then.
> >
> > no. based on what rationale?
And to prevent said gcc-9 version from migrating, to not break something
else (no idea whether it does, but..).
The
4 matches
Mail list logo
