Processing control commands:
> block -1 by 970134
Bug #966535 [release.debian.org] transition: pipewire 0.3
966535 was blocked by: 969612 969613 954022 969614
966535 was not blocking any bugs.
Added blocking bug(s) of 966535: 970134
--
966535: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=96
Control: block -1 by 970134
On Fri, 11 Sep 2020 at 00:40:27 +0100, Simon McVittie wrote:
> pipewire 0.3 is in unstable and built on all release architectures, so
> please upload weston, krfb and xdg-desktop-portal-kde to unstable
This happened, and pipewire 0.3 migrated. libpipewire-0.2-1 can't b
On Wed, 09 Sep 2020 at 13:17:05 +0100, Simon McVittie wrote:
> + weston
> * Either upload experimental version to unstable, or disable
> pipewire integration in unstable (as was already done in experimental)
> + krfb
> * Maintainers say they will apply
> https://salsa.debian
On Thu, 10 Sep 2020 at 09:04:49 +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> On 09/09/2020 14:17, Simon McVittie wrote:
> > - Deal with dependent packages:
> > + gnome-remote-desktop
> > * Remove from testing until we have a GNOME version that makes it
> > practically useful (it is not curren
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 confirmed
Bug #966535 [release.debian.org] transition: pipewire 0.3
Added tag(s) confirmed.
--
966535: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=966535
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Control: tags -1 confirmed
On 09/09/2020 14:17, Simon McVittie wrote:
> Control: tags -1 - moreinfo
>
> I think we're ready for a transition slot. The plan is:
>
> - Upload experimental pipewire (0.3.x) to unstable
>
> - Deal with dependent packages:
> + gnome-remote-desktop
> * Remove fr
On Wed, 09 Sep 2020 at 09:20:22 -0300, Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer
wrote:
> I understand that Simon already built the packages as he provided us
> with MRs on salsa
To be clear about their status: as I said in the MRs, they built
successfully in sbuild but have not otherwise been tested.
Hi!
On Tue, 8 Sep 2020 at 13:57, Simon McVittie wrote:
[snip]
> > - krfb and xdg-desktop-portal-kde appear to support both APIs upstream,
> > but will need some simple packaging changes to switch the dependency
>
> I've opened bugs. I'll try test-rebuilds of these soon if the KDE team
> don't g
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 - moreinfo
Bug #966535 [release.debian.org] transition: pipewire 0.3
Removed tag(s) moreinfo.
--
966535: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=966535
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Control: tags -1 - moreinfo
I think we're ready for a transition slot. The plan is:
- Upload experimental pipewire (0.3.x) to unstable
- Deal with dependent packages:
+ gnome-remote-desktop
* Remove from testing until we have a GNOME version that makes it
practically useful (it is no
On Thu, 30 Jul 2020 at 11:47:51 +0100, Simon McVittie wrote:
> pipewire will need a transition from 0.2.x to 0.3.x at some point,
> allowing remote desktop support in GNOME to be re-enabled. This is an
> API and ABI break, although the API breaks appear to be small enough
> that some packages suppo
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
Tags: moreinfo
Control: block -1 by 954022
Control: affects -1 + src:pipewire
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition
X-Debbugs-Cc: pipew...@packages.debian.org, k...@packages.debian.org,
wes...@packages.debian.org, mut...@pack
12 matches
Mail list logo
