Hey,
On Wed, Dec 9, 2020 at 3:13 PM Utkarsh Gupta wrote:
> I'll take a look at python-pygit2 today as well. So leaves us with
> ruby-rugged. I'll come to that in next few days if no one beats me to
> it.
FWIW, I've uploaded both, thereby completing all the blockers.
Hopefully this transition sho
Hello,
On Wed, Dec 9, 2020 at 2:23 AM Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
> > So I conclude that it's probably fine to upload libgit2 1.1.0 to unstable
> > now?
> Okay, then let's do this now. Please go ahead.
Awesome, uploaded!
I'll take a look at python-pygit2 today as well. So leaves us with
ruby-rugg
On 2020-12-08 16:58:46 +0530, Utkarsh Gupta wrote:
> Hi Sebastian,
>
> On Tue, Dec 8, 2020 at 3:30 PM Sebastian Ramacher
> wrote:
> > v30 was accepted. Please perform a source-only upload for the arch: all
> > packages.
>
> That should be done now! \o/
>
> > > The only reverse-{,build-}depende
On Tue, 8 Dec 2020 11:00:40 +0100 Sebastian Ramacher
wrote:
> Filed #976820 against gitaly.
I will follow it up with upstream.
> In any case, I'll remove golang-gopkg-libgit2-git2go.v28 and
> gitaly from testing to unblock this transition. gitaly is blocked by
> ruby-faraday which is currently
Hi Sebastian,
On Tue, Dec 8, 2020 at 3:30 PM Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
> v30 was accepted. Please perform a source-only upload for the arch: all
> packages.
That should be done now! \o/
> > The only reverse-{,build-}dependency is gitaly, it seems. So I'm CCing
> > Praveen so he gets a heads up.
On 2020-12-07 14:14:50 +0530, Utkarsh Gupta wrote:
> Hi Peter,
>
> On Sun, Dec 6, 2020 at 11:06 AM peter green wrote:
> > In addition to the packages mentioned here, it seems there is another
> > package involved: golang-gopkg-libgit2-git2go.v28 . It only builds
> > arch-all packages and does not
Hi Peter,
On Sun, Dec 6, 2020 at 11:06 AM peter green wrote:
> In addition to the packages mentioned here, it seems there is another
> package involved: golang-gopkg-libgit2-git2go.v28 . It only builds
> arch-all packages and does not directly depend on the library, but it
> FTBFS and it's autopk
I've rebuilt the relevant reverse-build-dependencies from unstable
In addition to the packages mentioned here, it seems there is another
package involved: golang-gopkg-libgit2-git2go.v28 . It only builds
arch-all packages and does not directly depend on the library, but it
FTBFS and it's autopkg
Hi,
On Sat, Dec 5, 2020 at 1:41 AM Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
> Scheduled the binNMUs except for horizon-eda (involved in python3.9-defaults).
Great, thank you!
I've, meanwhile, uploaded python-pygit2 and libgit-raw-perl! Will
hopefully get on to ruby-rugged, as well! \o/
- u
On 2020-12-05 00:12:00, Utkarsh Gupta wrote:
> Hi Sebastian,
>
> On Fri, Dec 4, 2020 at 10:54 PM Sebastian Ramacher
> wrote:
> > Please go ahead with the upload to unstable.
>
> Great, thanks, I did an upload just now! :)
Scheduled the binNMUs except for horizon-eda (involved in python3.9-defa
Hi Sebastian,
On Fri, Dec 4, 2020 at 10:54 PM Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
> Please go ahead with the upload to unstable.
Great, thanks, I did an upload just now! :)
- u
Processing control commands:
> forwarded -1 https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-libgit2.html
Bug #971571 [release.debian.org] transition: libgit2
Set Bug forwarded-to-address to
'https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-libgit2.html'.
> tags -1 confirmed
Bug #971571 [release.
Control: forwarded -1
https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-libgit2.html
Control: tags -1 confirmed
On 2020-10-02 01:44:50 +0100, Ximin Luo wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: transition
> Control: block -1
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition
Control: block -1 by 971562 971563 971564 971565 971566 971567 971568 971569
971570
Hello release team!
I'd like to request a transition slot for libgit2.
libgit2 1.0.0 is in experimen
14 matches
Mail list logo