Hi Hideki, Sebastian,
On 20-06-2021 16:02, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
>> --- squid-deb-proxy-0.8.15/debian/squid-deb-proxy.install2020-01-10
>> 19:02:40.0 +0900
>> +++ squid-deb-proxy-0.8.15+nmu1/debian/squid-deb-proxy.install
>> 2021-06-14 23:40:21.0 +0900
>> @@ -1,3 +1
Sebastian Ramacher (2021-06-20):
> I'm not an apparmor expert, but is this enough? Shouldn't there also be
> a profile for the binary that uses this abstraction?
>
> In any case, the package builds an udeb. Cyril, could you please (N)ACK
> for D-I?
Such apparmor things are no factor for d-i, no
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 moreinfo d-i
Bug #990065 [release.debian.org] unblock: squid-deb-proxy/0.8.15+nmu1
Added tag(s) d-i and moreinfo.
--
990065: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=990065
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Control: tags -1 moreinfo d-i
On 2021-06-19 15:33:48 +0900, Hideki Yamane wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: unblock
>
> Please unblock package squid-deb-proxy
>
> [ Reason ]
> squid-deb-proxy needs its apparmor pro
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package squid-deb-proxy
[ Reason ]
squid-deb-proxy needs its apparmor profile to work.
[ Impact ]
squid-deb-proxy does not work on bullseye
(There's a alternative, so not
5 matches
Mail list logo
