On 8 December 2021 at 12:16, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
| gsl now migrated and libgsl25 got removed from testing.
Fantastic! Thanks to you and to Patrick (CC'ed again) and we're back to where
we once were (GSL updates upstream, I can update without fuss or formal
transitions) but now we are
Hi Mattia and Sebastian,
On 6 December 2021 at 22:44, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
| Yes! See https://wiki.debian.org/BuildProfileSpec for the
| documentation.
|
| Unfortunately there have been a few troubles getting a formal and good
| specifical text that was "good enough" for the Debian Policy.
Hi Dirk,
On Mon, Dec 06, 2021 at 03:15:22PM -0600, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
> | Instead of doing that, this could also be solved with a build profile.
> | See https://wiki.debian.org/BuildProfileSpec and the attached patch. See
> | also gtk4 and libgtk-4-media-ffmpeg for an example.
>
> I can
Hi Sebastian,
On 6 December 2021 at 21:58, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
| gsl needs another upload. It currently lists libgsl-prof as package that
| should be built, but it isn't. I've been told that in the past this has
| been worked around by manually changing the .dsc before uploading.
It has
Hi Dirk
On 2021-12-02 16:52:25, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
> On 2 December 2021 at 15:57, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
> | Yep. It's in the queue by now. I sometimes forget if an experimental ->
> | unstable passage does or does not need an orig.tar.gz to go along or not but
> | the bots will tell me
On 2 December 2021 at 15:57, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
| Yep. It's in the queue by now. I sometimes forget if an experimental ->
| unstable passage does or does not need an orig.tar.gz to go along or not but
| the bots will tell me if so :)
And by now in unstable.
Thanks so much for looking
On 2 December 2021 at 22:39, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
| On 2021-12-02 15:11:20, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
| >
| > On 2 December 2021 at 20:55, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
| > | gsl cleared NEW thanks to ta. So this should be good to go.
| > |
| > | Please go ahead with the upload to unstable.
|
On 2021-12-02 15:11:20, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
>
> On 2 December 2021 at 20:55, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
> | gsl cleared NEW thanks to ta. So this should be good to go.
> |
> | Please go ahead with the upload to unstable.
>
> Will do. Without any other requirements, correct? I.e. standard
On 2 December 2021 at 20:55, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
| gsl cleared NEW thanks to ta. So this should be good to go.
|
| Please go ahead with the upload to unstable.
Will do. Without any other requirements, correct? I.e. standard upload which
thanks to Patrick's work will be around a new
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 = confirmed
Bug #998192 [release.debian.org] release.debian.org: Transition for gsl-2.7 /
libgsl26
Added tag(s) confirmed; removed tag(s) moreinfo.
--
998192: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=998192
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact
Control: tags -1 = confirmed
On 2021-12-01 20:39:24, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
>
> On 1 December 2021 at 21:41, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
> | Indeed, it will need a trip through NEW. So going via experimental would
> | be appreciated. But, once it passed NEW, you can then immediatly follow
> | up
On 1 December 2021 at 21:47, Patrick Alken wrote:
| Ok please send along the patches.
Sure thing. They are actually 'in the open' as we (== Debian devs) these days
have most / all work in git(-lab via our instance at salsa.debian.org). See
this directory and note that the 'series' file governs
Ok please send along the patches. Sorry again for all the trouble. Do
you know of some way I can check for libtool problems prior to making
new releases? I think this is the 3rd time something like this has happened
On 12/1/21 7:39 PM, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
On 1 December 2021 at 21:41,
On 1 December 2021 at 21:41, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
| Indeed, it will need a trip through NEW. So going via experimental would
| be appreciated. But, once it passed NEW, you can then immediatly follow
| up with the upload to unstable. I will take care of the binNMUs of the
| reverse
On 2021-12-01 09:15:01 -0600, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
>
> On 1 December 2021 at 09:45, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
> | On 2021-11-30 22:43:11 -0700, Patrick Alken wrote:
> | > All, I have uploaded a new GSL release (2.7.1) which I hope fixes the
> | > libtool version numbers
>
> Patrick,
>
> Big
On 1 December 2021 at 09:45, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
| On 2021-11-30 22:43:11 -0700, Patrick Alken wrote:
| > All, I have uploaded a new GSL release (2.7.1) which I hope fixes the
| > libtool version numbers
Patrick,
Big big thank you! (And I missed this email yesterday)
| Thank you!
|
|
Hi Patrick
On 2021-11-30 22:43:11 -0700, Patrick Alken wrote:
> All, I have uploaded a new GSL release (2.7.1) which I hope fixes the
> libtool version numbers
Thank you!
Dirk, please go ahead with gsl 2.7.1 in unstable whenever you are ready.
Cheers
>
> On 11/21/21 3:27 PM, Dirk
All, I have uploaded a new GSL release (2.7.1) which I hope fixes the
libtool version numbers
On 11/21/21 3:27 PM, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
Hi Patrick,
Can you please chime in (as you did in the earlier exchanges when Sebastian
explained to us how to set valus triplet for libtool via
On 22 November 2021 at 09:08, Patrick Alken wrote:
| Hi all, sorry for all this trouble. I will try to make a new GSL release
| with the correct numbers.
Much appreciate it!
Sebastian, we'll then run a new transition with gsl 2.8 (or whichever version
number it will be) and its new somajor.
Hi all, sorry for all this trouble. I will try to make a new GSL release
with the correct numbers.
On 11/22/21 2:18 AM, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
On 2021-11-21 16:27:03, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
Hi Patrick,
Can you please chime in (as you did in the earlier exchanges when Sebastian
explained
On 2021-11-21 16:27:03, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
>
> Hi Patrick,
>
> Can you please chime in (as you did in the earlier exchanges when Sebastian
> explained to us how to set valus triplet for libtool via configure.ac) ?
>
> On 21 November 2021 at 23:00, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
> | On
Hi Patrick,
Can you please chime in (as you did in the earlier exchanges when Sebastian
explained to us how to set valus triplet for libtool via configure.ac) ?
On 21 November 2021 at 23:00, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
| On 2021-11-09 12:54:44 -0600, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
| >
| > On 8
On 2021-11-09 12:54:44 -0600, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
>
> On 8 November 2021 at 22:14, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
> | Control: tags -1 moreinfo
> | Control: forwarded -1
> https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-gsl.html
> |
> | On 2021-10-31 14:29:40 -0500, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
>
On 8 November 2021 at 22:14, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
| Control: tags -1 moreinfo
| Control: forwarded -1
https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-gsl.html
|
| On 2021-10-31 14:29:40 -0500, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
| >
| > Package: release.debian.org
| > Severity: normal
| > User:
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
Control: forwarded -1 https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-gsl.html
On 2021-10-31 14:29:40 -0500, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
>
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: transition
>
> GNU GSL
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 moreinfo
Bug #998192 [release.debian.org] release.debian.org: Transition for gsl-2.7 /
libgsl26
Added tag(s) moreinfo.
> forwarded -1 https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-gsl.html
Bug #998192 [release.debian.org] release.debian.org: Tran
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition
GNU GSL 2.7 was release a few months ago, and we now realised (in the
discussion of #993324 which also included upstream) that the upstream libtool
instruction were in error by _not_
27 matches
Mail list logo
