Can someone please review http://bugs.debian.org/343060 and tell me what
to do about it? Several people are claiming libaspell needs to be
rebuilt, and in that case it would need a package name change and yet
another painful library transition. Obviously I don't want to do this
unless absolutely
On Mon, Jan 02, 2006 at 04:36:15PM -0500, Brian Nelson wrote:
Can someone please review http://bugs.debian.org/343060 and tell me what
to do about it? Several people are claiming libaspell needs to be
rebuilt, and in that case it would need a package name change and yet
another painful
Kurt Roeckx [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Mon, Jan 02, 2006 at 04:36:15PM -0500, Brian Nelson wrote:
Can someone please review http://bugs.debian.org/343060 and tell me what
to do about it? Several people are claiming libaspell needs to be
rebuilt, and in that case it would need a package
On Tue, Jan 03, 2006 at 12:05:01AM +0100, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
On Mon, Jan 02, 2006 at 04:36:15PM -0500, Brian Nelson wrote:
Can someone please review http://bugs.debian.org/343060 and tell me what
to do about it? Several people are claiming libaspell needs to be
rebuilt, and in that case it
On Mon, Jan 02, 2006 at 08:03:24PM -0500, Brian Nelson wrote:
Kurt Roeckx [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Mon, Jan 02, 2006 at 04:36:15PM -0500, Brian Nelson wrote:
Can someone please review http://bugs.debian.org/343060 and tell me what
to do about it? Several people are claiming libaspell
5 matches
Mail list logo