On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 09:42:20PM +0200, Niels Thykier wrote:
From what I can tell, the subgoal-important claims to only miss 5-7
packages[1], so I guess we can expect that subgoal will be fixed in
Jessie if the goal is carried over.
I suppose so.
Would it be possible to include a summary
Jonathan Wiltshire j...@debian.org schrieb:
Goals which were accepted for the Wheezy cycle, but did not reach
completion, can be carried over for Jessie. However, we require
re-submission of those goals (and any that have been discussed up until now
- we are starting with a clean slate) to
On 2013-09-25 19:02, Moritz Mühlenhoff wrote:
Jonathan Wiltshire j...@debian.org schrieb:
Goals which were accepted for the Wheezy cycle, but did not reach
completion, can be carried over for Jessie. However, we require
re-submission of those goals (and any that have been discussed up until
On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 07:06:37PM +0200, Niels Thykier wrote:
On 2013-09-25 19:02, Moritz Mühlenhoff wrote:
Jonathan Wiltshire j...@debian.org schrieb:
Goals which were accepted for the Wheezy cycle, but did not reach
completion, can be carried over for Jessie. However, we require
On 2013-09-25 21:15, Moritz Mühlenhoff wrote:
On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 07:06:37PM +0200, Niels Thykier wrote:
On 2013-09-25 19:02, Moritz Mühlenhoff wrote:
Jonathan Wiltshire j...@debian.org schrieb:
Goals which were accepted for the Wheezy cycle, but did not reach
completion, can be carried
On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 09:15:43PM +0200, Moritz Mühlenhoff wrote:
On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 07:06:37PM +0200, Niels Thykier wrote:
On 2013-09-25 19:02, Moritz Mühlenhoff wrote:
Jonathan Wiltshire j...@debian.org schrieb:
Goals which were accepted for the Wheezy cycle, but did not reach
The deadline for submission of release goals for the Jessie cycle is
midnight, next Monday 30th September.
To propose a goal, you should create a page on the wiki [WIKI] with a short
goal description, details of the advocate(s) and how the goal will be
achieved. The multi-arch goal [MA-GOAL] from
On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 9:17 PM, Jonathan Wiltshire j...@debian.org wrote:
Release goals are areas of functionality which developers would like to see
as an aim for the next release. They will not hold up the release, but
allow the bugs opened for that goal to be of severity 'important'.
I am
On 18 September 2013 03:42, Mathieu Malaterre ma...@debian.org wrote:
On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 9:17 PM, Jonathan Wiltshire j...@debian.org wrote:
Release goals are areas of functionality which developers would like to see
as an aim for the next release. They will not hold up the release, but
Am 18.09.2013 15:38, schrieb Dmitrijs Ledkovs:
On 18 September 2013 03:42, Mathieu Malaterre ma...@debian.org wrote:
On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 9:17 PM, Jonathan Wiltshire j...@debian.org wrote:
Release goals are areas of functionality which developers would like to see
as an aim for the next
On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 3:17 PM, Jonathan Wiltshire j...@debian.org wrote:
The Release Team calls for the submission of release goals for the Jessie
cycle.
Release goals are areas of functionality which developers would like to see
as an aim for the next release. They will not hold up the
Hi Brian,
On 2013-09-11 21:53, Brian Gupta wrote:
I am considering putting forth a proposal to make MariaDB the default
mysql binary provider for Jesse. However there are a number of
unresolved issues, that might prevent consensus at this time:
A release goal should be broadly consensual,
On 11/09/13 23:25, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
My feeling is that this is too narrow to be suitable for a release goal
This, and the recent proposal for openjdk-6 removal, sound more like
release 'roadmap' ideas within the relevant team; but it seems good to
solicit and publish these too.
13 matches
Mail list logo
