Re: Coordinating efforts to get a new kernel in testing?

2009-07-12 Thread Martin Michlmayr
* Paul Wise [2009-07-12 09:57]: > > Like FTBFS of linux-modules-extra-2.6 on 3 architectures I guess? That > > seemed to me like a valid reason not to want to migrate .29 to testing. > > Also the armel linux-2.6 FTBFS: > > https://buildd.debian.org/fetch.cgi?pkg=linux-2.6;ver=2.6.30-2;arch=armel

Re: Coordinating efforts to get a new kernel in testing?

2009-07-11 Thread Paul Wise
On Sun, Jul 12, 2009 at 5:29 AM, Frans Pop wrote: > Like FTBFS of linux-modules-extra-2.6 on 3 architectures I guess? That > seemed to me like a valid reason not to want to migrate .29 to testing. Also the armel linux-2.6 FTBFS: https://buildd.debian.org/fetch.cgi?pkg=linux-2.6;ver=2.6.30-2;arc

Re: Coordinating efforts to get a new kernel in testing?

2009-07-11 Thread Frans Pop
On Saturday 11 July 2009, Luk Claes wrote: > > what are the remaining issues that you are concerned about? > > The ones that prevent linux-2.6 from migrating once it would be > unblocked. Like FTBFS of linux-modules-extra-2.6 on 3 architectures I guess? That seemed to me like a valid reason not t

Re: Coordinating efforts to get a new kernel in testing?

2009-07-11 Thread Luk Claes
maximilian attems wrote: > On Sat, Jul 11, 2009 at 01:08:05PM +0200, Luk Claes wrote: >> It needs quite some work to get reverse dependencies handled and getting >> it built on all architectures. Both of which are the main responsability >> of the kernel team... > > it is mostly done, beside the s

Re: Coordinating efforts to get a new kernel in testing?

2009-07-11 Thread maximilian attems
On Sat, Jul 11, 2009 at 01:08:05PM +0200, Luk Claes wrote: > > It needs quite some work to get reverse dependencies handled and getting > it built on all architectures. Both of which are the main responsability > of the kernel team... it is mostly done, beside the strange cpio missing build dep,

Re: Coordinating efforts to get a new kernel in testing?

2009-07-11 Thread Christian Perrier
Quoting Luk Claes (l...@debian.org): > > Could this be prioritized by the involved teams (mostly kernel and > > release, I'd guess) or are there already some plans for this to > > happen? > > There are no plans to force anything in like some propose in such > situations as there is no clear plan

Re: Coordinating efforts to get a new kernel in testing?

2009-07-11 Thread Luk Claes
Christian Perrier wrote: > During the last meeting of the D-I 'team' (ahem) which logs can be read > from http://wiki.debian.org/DebianInstaller/Meetings, the situation > of the kernel packages wrt testing transition was raised. > > Apparently, having a new kernel in testing (whether this is 2.6.3

Coordinating efforts to get a new kernel in testing?

2009-07-07 Thread Christian Perrier
During the last meeting of the D-I 'team' (ahem) which logs can be read from http://wiki.debian.org/DebianInstaller/Meetings, the situation of the kernel packages wrt testing transition was raised. Apparently, having a new kernel in testing (whether this is 2.6.30 or whatever other funky new versi