Re: Current and future iceweasel transitions

2012-01-24 Thread Cyril Brulebois
Michael Biebl (20/01/2012): > > Or are we heading for having a separate libmozjs package, which would > > solve half the current problem with new iceweasel releases? > > http://ftp-master.debian.org/new/mozjs_1.8.5-1.0.0+dfsg-1.html > > At least for GNOME/gjs we are planning to use mozjs185 as s

Re: Current and future iceweasel transitions

2012-01-20 Thread Michael Biebl
Hi, On 20.01.2012 10:40, Mike Hommey wrote: > Seeing how things are (not) moving for Iceweasel 9, I'm pondering what It would have been great if you could have coordinated the iceweasel 9 upload with the release team. From what I can see, this didn't happen and has stalled the GNOME 3.2 transitio

Current and future iceweasel transitions

2012-01-20 Thread Mike Hommey
Hi, Seeing how things are (not) moving for Iceweasel 9, I'm pondering what to do next: Iceweasel 10 is due on January 30 and I would like to promptly upload it to unstable. There is a major change coming with Iceweasel 10: it will be supported upstream for more than 6 weeks. The timing of this ext