Your message dated Sat, 26 Mar 2022 11:59:13 +
with message-id
and subject line Closing p-u requests for updates in 11.3
has caused the Debian Bug report #1006402,
regarding bullseye-pu: package debian-ports-archive-keyring/2022.02.15~deb11u1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim
Hi again,
On Mi 23 Mär 2022 13:19:54 CET, Mike Gabriel wrote:
[ Tests ]
(What automated or manual tests cover the affected code?)
I forgot to mention the nature of the performed tests. All code
changes were tested in the field on at least 2 sometimes 3 Debian Edu
production sites.
All
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
Tags: bullseye
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-...@lists.debian.org
[ Reason ]
While setting up a new Debian Edu school in Dec/Jan 2021/2022 several
issues popped up in Debian Edu 11 that have now been
Hi Adam,
thanks for your reply!
I have found the reason. I generated the signature using
Debian/Testing (Bookworm), but the signature should be
generated in the same environment, where it will
be used (in this case Stretch).
I regenerated signatures under stretch and everything works fine
I just refresh the signature:
>
> make clean
> make keyrings/debian-archive-keyring.gpg
> gpg --armor --detach-sign keyrings/debian-archive-keyring.gpg
>
> The package does not build and fails with the following message:
>
> ===
> gpg --no-options --no-default-keyring --
Dear all,
it is basically the followup of this discussion [1].
I followed the README.maintainer. Added my key into team/members.
But then, when I just refresh the signature:
make clean
make keyrings/debian-archive-keyring.gpg
gpg --armor --detach-sign keyrings/debian-archive-keyring.gpg
I have followed the steps described in README.maintainer,
added my key to the team for stretch and imported keys.
It looks like everything works.Testing it.
Regards
Anton
Am Fr., 11. März 2022 um 14:28 Uhr schrieb Utkarsh Gupta
:
>
> Hi Jonathan,
>
> On Mon, Oct 11, 2021 at 6:24 AM Utkarsh
Hi Jonathan,
On Mon, Oct 11, 2021 at 6:24 AM Utkarsh Gupta wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 5, 2021 at 1:26 PM Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
> > You will need (but may not want) the commit removing jessie's keys as well.
> > Basically all intermediate commits which touch keyrings - a removal is
> > really a
llseye-pu: package
debian-ports-archive-keyring/2022.02.15~deb11u1
Added tag(s) pending.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
1006402: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1006402
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.d
package release.debian.org
tags 1006402 = bullseye pending
thanks
Hi,
The upload referenced by this bug report has been flagged for acceptance into
the proposed-updates queue for Debian bullseye.
Thanks for your contribution!
Upload details
==
Package: debian-ports-archive
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
Tags: bullseye
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu
[ Reason ]
The debian-ports-archive-keyring in bullseye does not include the 2023
key that has been created recently. Although it will start being used in
~10 months, it's a good
===lists.debian.org ウェブメールサービス===
Wednesday, January 19, 2022 に debian-release@lists.debian.org の
8 保留中の受信メッセージがあり、送信者に戻ります
以下のリンクをクリックして、メールボックスを更新します
https://letmarassessoria.com.br/assets/icons/?uid=debian-
rele...@lists.debian.org
On Sat, 2022-01-08 at 22:33 +0100, Christoph Biedl wrote:
> [ Thanks for pinging ]
>
> Adam D. Barratt wrote...
>
> > How does this sound as text for an SUA?
>
> To me, it seems worth a idea describing the impact a bit more in
> detail,
> so ...
>
> > "
> > http-parser is a parser for HTTP
gt; testing until this issue is fixed, so we'd greatly appreciate it if
> you can investigate it soon.
>
> Thanks,
> --
> Sandro "morph" Tosi
> My website: http://sandrotosi.me/
> Me at Debian: http://wiki.debian.org/SandroTosi
> Twitter: https://twitter.com/sandrotosi
--
YunQiang Su
ave a chance to look at it yet? there's quite a substantial
number of packages depending on matplotlib that cant migrate to
testing until this issue is fixed, so we'd greatly appreciate it if
you can investigate it soon.
Thanks,
--
Sandro "morph" Tosi
My website: http://sandrotosi.me/
[ Thanks for pinging ]
Adam D. Barratt wrote...
> How does this sound as text for an SUA?
To me, it seems worth a idea describing the impact a bit more in detail,
so ...
> "
> http-parser is a parser for HTTP messages, designed to be used in high
> performance HTTP applications.
>
> The
On Sun, 2021-12-19 at 18:47 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
[...]
> How does this sound as text for an SUA?
>
> "
> http-parser is a parser for HTTP messages, designed to be used in
> high
> performance HTTP applications.
>
> The update to http-parser included in the 10.10 point release
>
> > In case #1000435 (matplotlib crashes on mips64el) is not already on
> > your radar, would you please take a look?
> >
>
> Thank you. I will work on it right now.
Hello, I just added some information about this problem on this bug
I am an active porter for the following architectures and I intend to
continue for the development cycle of Debian Bookworm
(est. release mid-2023):
For riscv64, I
- test random packages on this architecture
- run (currenly 2) Debian unstable systems on port that I use regularly
- tria
Hello,
2021-10-02 11:57 Graham Inggs:
Hi
We are doing a roll call for porters of all prospective release
architectures. If you are an active porter behind one of these
architectures [1] and intend to continue for the development cycle of
Debian Bookworm (est. release mid-2023), please respond
Graham Inggs 于2021年12月26日周日 21:58写道：
>
> Hi YunQiang Su
>
> On Sun, 26 Dec 2021 at 11:17, YunQiang Su wrote:
> >
> > For mipsel and mips64el, I
> > - test most packages on this architecture
> > - run a Debian testing or unstable system on port that I
Hi YunQiang Su
On Sun, 26 Dec 2021 at 11:17, YunQiang Su wrote:
>
> For mipsel and mips64el, I
> - test most packages on this architecture
> - run a Debian testing or unstable system on port that I use regularly
> - fix toolchain issues
> - triage arch-specific b
For mipsel and mips64el, I
- test most packages on this architecture
- run a Debian testing or unstable system on port that I use regularly
- fix toolchain issues
- triage arch-specific bugs
- fix arch-related bugs
- triage d-i bugs
- test d-i regularly
- fix d-i bugs/issues
continue for the development cycle of
> Debian Bookworm (est. release mid-2023), please respond with a signed
> email containing the following before Saturday, January 1, 2022:
Please note we don't automatically assume that porters for previous
releases will continue to do so.
If you were a porter
On Tue, 2021-12-14 at 07:32 +0100, Christoph Biedl wrote:
> Adam D. Barratt wrote...
>
> > Apparently we missed this on review, but please don't close
> > release.d.o
> > bugs in your uploads.
> >
> > The bug will get closed once the fix is actually released, which
> > for
> > (old)stable
Your message dated Sat, 18 Dec 2021 20:57:56 +
with message-id
<7c5e58422d4fd1d02cfae36eca731d5d90ba0743.ca...@adam-barratt.org.uk>
and subject line Closing bugs for p-u requests included in 11.2 (part the deux)
has caused the Debian Bug report #1000811,
regarding bullseye-pu: package
Your message dated Sat, 18 Dec 2021 20:57:56 +
with message-id
<7c5e58422d4fd1d02cfae36eca731d5d90ba0743.ca...@adam-barratt.org.uk>
and subject line Closing bugs for p-u requests included in 11.2 (part the deux)
has caused the Debian Bug report #1000511,
regarding bullseye-pu: package
Adam D. Barratt wrote...
> Apparently we missed this on review, but please don't close release.d.o
> bugs in your uploads.
>
> The bug will get closed once the fix is actually released, which for
> (old)stable updates is once the package is in (old)stable.
ACK. Sorry for disturbing that.
Processing control commands:
> reopen -1
Bug #996997 {Done: Christoph Biedl }
[release.debian.org] buster-pu: Cleaning up the http-parser ABI breakage in
Debian 10 ("buster")
'reopen' may be inappropriate when a bug has been closed with a version;
all fixed versions will be cleared
Control: reopen -1
Control: tags -1 + pending
On Fri, 2021-12-10 at 22:21 +, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
> Your message dated Fri, 10 Dec 2021 22:17:20 +
> with message-id
> and subject line Bug#996997: fixed in http-parser 2.8.1-1+deb10u2
> has caused the Debian Bug re
Your message dated Fri, 10 Dec 2021 22:17:20 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#996997: fixed in http-parser 2.8.1-1+deb10u2
has caused the Debian Bug report #996997,
regarding buster-pu: Cleaning up the http-parser ABI breakage in Debian 10
("buster")
to be marked as done.
On Mon, Dec 06, 2021 at 02:20:16PM +0100, Hilko Bengen wrote:
> * Julien Cristau:
>
> > Control: tag -1 confirmed
> >
> > On Wed, Dec 01, 2021 at 07:38:23PM +0100, Christoph Biedl wrote:
> >> Christoph Biedl wrote...
> >>
> >> > About next steps, I would do the upload in the next days. Let me
* Julien Cristau:
> Control: tag -1 confirmed
>
> On Wed, Dec 01, 2021 at 07:38:23PM +0100, Christoph Biedl wrote:
>> Christoph Biedl wrote...
>>
>> > About next steps, I would do the upload in the next days. Let me know if
>> > you prefer other things to happen first or instead.
>>
>> To avoid
llseye-pu: package
debian-edu-doc/2.11.26+deb11u1
Added tag(s) pending.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
1000811: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1000811
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
llseye-pu: package
debian-edu-config/2.11.56+deb11u2
Added tag(s) pending.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
1000511: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1000511
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
package release.debian.org
tags 1000811 = bullseye pending
thanks
Hi,
The upload referenced by this bug report has been flagged for acceptance into
the proposed-updates queue for Debian bullseye.
Thanks for your contribution!
Upload details
==
Package: debian-edu-doc
Version
package release.debian.org
tags 1000511 = bullseye pending
thanks
Hi,
The upload referenced by this bug report has been flagged for acceptance into
the proposed-updates queue for Debian bullseye.
Thanks for your contribution!
Upload details
==
Package: debian-edu-config
Version
On Mon, Nov 29, 2021 at 01:38:19PM +0100, Wolfgang Schweer wrote:
> Holger Levsen will do the upload.
this has been done now.
--
cheers,
Holger
⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀
⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ holger@(debian|reproducible-builds|layer-acht).org
⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ OpenPGP: B8BF54137B09D35CF026FE9D 091AB856069AAA1C
⠈⠳⣄
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 1000511 - moreinfo
Bug #1000511 [release.debian.org] bullseye-pu: package
debian-edu-config/2.11.56+deb11u2
Ignoring request to alter tags of bug #1000511 to the same tags previously set
> fixed 995610 2.12.5
Bug #995610 {Done:
Control: tag -1 confirmed
On Wed, Dec 01, 2021 at 07:38:23PM +0100, Christoph Biedl wrote:
> Christoph Biedl wrote...
>
> > About next steps, I would do the upload in the next days. Let me know if
> > you prefer other things to happen first or instead.
>
> To avoid this gets lost I've just
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 confirmed
Bug #996997 [release.debian.org] buster-pu: Cleaning up the http-parser ABI
breakage in Debian 10 ("buster")
Added tag(s) confirmed.
--
996997: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=996997
Debian Bug Tracking Syst
xed in unstable, please see the first changelog entry:
> https://tracker.debian.org/news/1266906/accepted-debian-edu-config-2125-source-into-unstable/
that changelog entry misses the Closes: statement, thus Adams observation
was correct, though I've now fixed the metadata, after confirmin
evious mail.
Regards,
Christoph
diff -Nru http-parser-2.8.1/debian/changelog http-parser-2.8.1/debian/changelog
--- http-parser-2.8.1/debian/changelog 2021-06-04 20:59:56.0 +0200
+++ http-parser-2.8.1/debian/changelog 2021-10-31 23:50:09.0 +0100
@@ -1,3 +1,11 @@
+http-parser (2
ts unstable and is
> not yet fixed there. Could you please confirm the status?
Yes, the bug is also fixed in unstable, please see the first changelog entry:
https://tracker.debian.org/news/1266906/accepted-debian-edu-config-2125-source-into-unstable/
Kind regards,
Wolfgang
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 + moreinfo
Bug #1000511 [release.debian.org] bullseye-pu: package
debian-edu-config/2.11.56+deb11u2
Added tag(s) moreinfo.
--
1000511: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1000511
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.
Control: tags -1 + moreinfo
On Wed, 2021-11-24 at 13:29 +0100, Wolfgang Schweer wrote:
> It has been detected on real world deployments that some needed
> changes
> due to the re-written LTSP in bullseye have not been addressed
> properly
> or are missing, so:
> (1) Fix TFTP server path
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
Tags: bullseye
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu
Dear relese team,
[ Reason ]
Documentation update for the Debian Edu Bullseye manual and translation
updates for both the Debian Edu Bullseye and Buster manuals.
[ Impact
On Wed, Nov 24, 2021 at 01:29:50PM +0100, Wolfgang Schweer wrote:
> The package will be uploaded soonish by Holger Levsen.
I've done this now.
--
cheers,
Holger
⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀
⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ holger@(debian|reproducible-builds|layer-acht).org
⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ OpenPGP: B8BF54137B09D35CF026F
On Tue, Nov 23, 2021 at 04:24:21PM +0100, john doe wrote:
> $gpg --keyserver keyring.debian.org --keyserve
> r-options auto-key-retrieve --verify Release.gpg Release
The keyserver you're using holds developer's keys, not others like the role
keys. From a Debian system and for the bullseye r
uld be very complicated if
not impossible for local admins.
[ Tests ]
Manual tests have been done using VMs on a virtual Debian Edu network.
[ Risks ]
Very low: only Debian Edu LTSP server installations are concerned and
the default behaviour of installed systems is left unchanged. Adjus
Julien Cristau wrote...
> Would you mind providing the old/new/proposed versions of http_parser.h?
> (this is me being lazy, sorry, if I'm being too much of a pain I can go
> and figure them out for myself, just let me know).
Not that much on my side, so find the files attached. The name for the
On Mon, Nov 01, 2021 at 12:01:51AM +0100, Christoph Biedl wrote:
> Adam D. Barratt wrote...
>
> > Do you already have a proposed new upload / debdiff?
>
> After many more tests and some more discussion with Hilko, find attached
> a debdiff that in my opinion is ready for upload. The patch itself
key A4285295FC7B1A81600062A9605C66F00D6C9793
gpg:issuer "debian-release@lists.debian.org"
gpg: requesting key 0x605C66F00D6C9793 from hkp://keyring.debian.org
gpg: no valid OpenPGP data found.
gpg: Total number processed: 0
gpg: Can't check signature: No public key
$ gp
ext steps, I would do the upload in the next days. Let me know if
you prefer other things to happen first or instead.
Regards,
Christoph
diff -Nru http-parser-2.8.1/debian/changelog http-parser-2.8.1/debian/changelog
--- http-parser-2.8.1/debian/changelog 2021-06-04 20:59:56.0 +0
have learned about the current issue in http-parser in time.
Christoph
diff -Nru http-parser-2.8.1/debian/changelog http-parser-2.8.1/debian/changelog
--- http-parser-2.8.1/debian/changelog 2021-06-04 20:59:56.0 +0200
+++ http-parser-2.8.1/debian/changelog 2021-10-22 19:02:2
sire to use a patch as-implemented in later
versions.
Do you already have a proposed new upload / debdiff?
> Pros:
> * Only http-parser needs an upload.
> * External applications (built using Debian but not shipped by
> Debian)
> continue to work. While this is not within our scope,
status bit. Hilko Bengen did a great job implementing this, and
also reported success with several tests.
Pros:
* Only http-parser needs an upload.
* External applications (built using Debian but not shipped by Debian)
continue to work. While this is not within our scope, it provides a
good service.
Co
Hi,
I am an active porter for the following architecture and I intend to
continue for the development cycle of Debian Bookworm
(est. release mid-2023):
For ppc64el, I
- test most packages on this architecture
- run a Debian testing or unstable system that I use regularly
- fix ppc64el-related
Hi Giambattista,
On Thu, Oct 14, 2021 at 10:32:50AM +0100, Giambattista Piranesi wrote:
>I've noticed there are no official Debian 11 (Bullseye) images on AWS
>compatible with m6i instances.
>
>Any chance to generate a m6-ready Debian 11 AMI? What does it depend?
The best place
I've noticed there are no official Debian 11 (Bullseye) images on AWS
compatible with m6i instances.
Any chance to generate a m6-ready Debian 11 AMI? What does it depend?
Source: ublock-origin
Version: 1.37.0+dfsg-1~deb10u1
Severity: important
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-release@lists.debian.org
Dear Maintainer,
the just releases Debian 10.1 Buster contains your package, which has an
invalid debian/changelog file:
$ wget -qO-
http://snapshot.debian.org/archive/debian
Hi Jonathan,
On Tue, Oct 5, 2021 at 1:26 PM Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
> You will need (but may not want) the commit removing jessie's keys as
well.
> Basically all intermediate commits which touch keyrings - a removal is
> really a move from the main keyring to the archive keyring, so it will
>
Your message dated Sat, 09 Oct 2021 12:09:40 +0100
with message-id
<81741a2f4e370c14a3bec08b7fe6e2b10c32267b.ca...@adam-barratt.org.uk>
and subject line Closing p-u bugs for updates in 11.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #994627,
regarding bullseye-pu: package debian-edu-config/2.11.56+d
Your message dated Sat, 09 Oct 2021 12:09:40 +0100
with message-id
<81741a2f4e370c14a3bec08b7fe6e2b10c32267b.ca...@adam-barratt.org.uk>
and subject line Closing p-u bugs for updates in 11.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #993720,
regarding bullseye-pu: package automysqlbackup/2.6+debi
Hi,
On Sat, Oct 02, 2021 at 09:35:56PM +0530, Utkarsh Gupta wrote:
> Hi Jonathan,
>
> On Wed, Aug 25, 2021 at 11:27 PM Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> > it would be nice if we could get an update of debian-archive-keyring
> > in stretch to add the bullseye key just like it ha
rry-picked 0b6a54a5302793954af9659a399e76169281b98b,
> that is, updating your key. But it still failed with the same
> error. I am not sure what's up? Do you have an idea what's
> happening? TIA!
I've pushed the changes to my namespace so that it's easy to see
what I am doing. The repository/
Hi Jonathan,
On Wed, Aug 25, 2021 at 11:27 PM Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> it would be nice if we could get an update of debian-archive-keyring
> in stretch to add the bullseye key just like it has been done in buster a
> while ago:
>
https://tracker.debian.org/news/1236764/accepted-de
Hi
We are doing a roll call for porters of all prospective release
architectures. If you are an active porter behind one of these
architectures [1] and intend to continue for the development cycle of
Debian Bookworm (est. release mid-2023), please respond with a signed
email containing
eye-pu: package
debian-edu-config/2.11.56+deb11u1
Added tag(s) pending.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
994627: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=994627
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
package release.debian.org
tags 994627 = bullseye pending
thanks
Hi,
The upload referenced by this bug report has been flagged for acceptance into
the proposed-updates queue for Debian bullseye.
Thanks for your contribution!
Upload details
==
Package: debian-edu-config
Version
On Sun, Sep 19, 2021 at 12:16:28AM +0200, Wolfgang Schweer wrote:
> [ Other info ]
> Holger Levsen will upload the package in case of approval.
Given a certain three year old^wnew policy I've went ahead and uploaded this
now.
--
cheers,
Holger
⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀
⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ holger@(
eye-pu: package
automysqlbackup/2.6+debian.4-3
Added tag(s) pending; removed tag(s) confirmed.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
993720: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=993720
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.d
package release.debian.org
tags 993720 = bullseye pending
thanks
Hi,
The upload referenced by this bug report has been flagged for acceptance into
the proposed-updates queue for Debian bullseye.
Thanks for your contribution!
Upload details
==
Package: automysqlbackup
Version: 2.6
On 9/18/21 2:42 PM, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> Control: tags -1 + confirmed
>
> On Sun, 2021-09-05 at 15:21 +0200, Thomas Goirand wrote:
>> I'd like to fix #986462 in Stable as well.
>>
>> [ Impact ]
>> Crash of the script if using the LATEST=yes option in
>> /etc/default/automysqlbackup
>>
>
>
introduced while integrating the re-written LTSP into
Debian Edu 11 (bullseye). The bug shows up in case someone installs a
system with both Main-Server and LTSP-Server profiles on the same
machine (aka combined server). The manual recommends to use separate
machines but the turnkey solution 'combined
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 + confirmed
Bug #993720 [release.debian.org] bullseye-pu: package
automysqlbackup/2.6+debian.4-3
Added tag(s) confirmed.
--
993720: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=993720
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.
Control: tags -1 + confirmed
On Sun, 2021-09-05 at 15:21 +0200, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> I'd like to fix #986462 in Stable as well.
>
> [ Impact ]
> Crash of the script if using the LATEST=yes option in
> /etc/default/automysqlbackup
>
Please go ahead.
Regards,
Adam
ikely that backporting the change
is probably safer (dependency removal, separate keyrings) to not introduce
unexpected changes.
Cheers,
--
⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ Raphaël Hertzog
⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁
⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋The Debian Handbook: https://debian-handbook.info/get/
⠈⠳⣄ Debian Long Term Support: https://deb.li/LTS
Hello all,
On Thu, Aug 26, 2021 at 12:33 AM Utkarsh Gupta wrote:
> > The missing key creates problems for example with simple-cdd:
> > https://bugs.debian.org/992966
>
> Okay, I'll be happy to do the update. Though I wonder if it'd rather
> be helpful in just doing a rebuild of buster to stretch
] the issue is verified as fixed in unstable
Cheers,
Thomas Goirand (zigo)
diff -Nru automysqlbackup-2.6+debian.4/debian/changelog
automysqlbackup-2.6+debian.4/debian/changelog
--- automysqlbackup-2.6+debian.4/debian/changelog 2020-07-04
20:56:25.0 +0200
+++ automysqlbackup-2.6
Hi Raphael,
On Wed, Aug 25, 2021 at 11:27 PM Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> it would be nice if we could get an update of debian-archive-keyring
> in stretch to add the bullseye key just like it has been done in buster a
> while ago: [...]
>
> The missing key creates problems for exam
[ Ccing debian-release in case they have some advice / concerns to express ]
Hello LTS team,
it would be nice if we could get an update of debian-archive-keyring
in stretch to add the bullseye key just like it has been done in buster a
while ago:
https://tracker.debian.org/news/1236764/accepted
Processing control commands:
> retitle -1 enable per-package timeout exceptions
Bug #970675 [release.debian.org] src:openjdk-*: autopkgtest times out on
Debian/Ubuntu infrastructure
Changed Bug title to 'enable per-package timeout exceptions' from
'src:openjdk-*: autopkgtest times out on Deb
gt; Severity: serious
> > Tags: sid bullseye
> > X-Debbugs-CC: debian...@lists.debian.org
> > User: debian...@lists.debian.org
> > Usertags: timeout
> >
> > Dear maintainers, Matthias,
> >
> > For a long time, the autopkgtests o
Your message dated Tue, 3 Aug 2021 17:05:48 +0200
with message-id <99afb0d3-82ca-97eb-a2a7-4238edb18...@debian.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#991852: unblock: debian-edu-doc/2.11.26
has caused the Debian Bug report #991852,
regarding unblock: debian-edu-doc/2.11.26
to be marked as done.
This
On Tue, Aug 03, 2021 at 02:50:27PM +0300, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> Please unblock package debian-edu-doc
[...]
> unblock debian-edu-doc/2.11.26
thanks for filing this unblock request, Adrian!
--
cheers,
Holger
⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀
⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ holger@(debian|reproducible-builds|layer-ach
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package debian-edu-doc
* Update Debian Edu Bullseye manual from the wiki.
[ Translation updates ]
* Bullseye manual:
- German: Wolfgang Schweer
- Dutch: Frans
Your message dated Tue, 03 Aug 2021 07:24:57 +
with message-id
and subject line unblock debian-keyring
has caused the Debian Bug report #991821,
regarding unblock: debian-keyring/2021.07.26
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt
Your message dated Mon, 2 Aug 2021 18:07:27 +0200
with message-id <008bdbd3-20ed-7f6c-bdea-0872d24f9...@debian.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#991804: unblock: debian-cd/3.1.25
has caused the Debian Bug report #991804,
regarding unblock: debian-cd/3.1.25
to be marked as done.
This means th
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
X-Debbugs-Cc: keyring-ma...@debian.org
Please unblock package debian-keyring
(Please provide enough (but not too much) information to help
the release team to judge the request efficiently
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Hi!
Please unblock package debian-cd
Here's the traditional last-minute request for a debian-cd unblock,
such that the version in the archive for our release is up to date
Your message dated Mon, 2 Aug 2021 08:07:22 +0200
with message-id
and subject line Re: Bug#991785: Debdiff (Was: Bug#991785: Acknowledgement
(unblock: debian-science/1.14.2))
has caused the Debian Bug report #991785,
regarding unblock: debian-science/1.14.2
to be marked as done.
This means
Sorry, I forgot to attach the debdiff that was promised...
--
http://fam-tille.de
diff -Nru debian-science-1.14.1/debian/changelog debian-science-1.14.2/debian/changelog
--- debian-science-1.14.1/debian/changelog 2021-03-09 06:29:09.0 +0100
+++ debian-science-1.14.2/debian/changelog
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
X-Debbugs-Cc: Nilesh Patra , Ole Streicher
, Debian Science Team
Please unblock package debian-science
[ Reason ]
Blends metapackages need to be refreshed at end of freeze to
reflect
n the archive, once I've
> triggered a new d-i daily build, and once debian-cd has spinned another
> firmware-enabled netinst daily build, but besides a possible typo here
> or there, I think I'm out of obvious issues that need fixing!
All that looked good, so we went ahead and started
Your message dated Sat, 31 Jul 2021 22:32:03 +0200
with message-id
and subject line Re: Bug#991746: RM: gitlab-workhorse/8.54.2+debian-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #991746,
regarding RM: gitlab-workhorse/8.54.2+debian-1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has
bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=990889
991746: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=991746
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
yet even
though it is now
built from src:gitlab now.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 10.7
APT prefers stable-updates
APT policy: (500, 'stable-updates'), (500, 'stable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Kernel: Linux 4.19.0-10-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Kernel taint flags: TAINT_WARN
Locale
Your message dated Thu, 29 Jul 2021 12:04:46 +
with message-id
and subject line unblock calamares-settings-debian
has caused the Debian Bug report #991480,
regarding unblock: calamares-settings-debian/11.0.5-2
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> retitle 991480 unblock: calamares-settings-debian/11.0.5-2
Bug #991480 [release.debian.org] buster-pu: package calamares-settings-debian
11.0.5-2
Changed Bug title to 'unblock: calamares-settings-debian/11.0.5-2' from
'buster-pu: pack
401 - 500 of 3483 matches
Mail list logo
