HI Cyril,
On Mon, Jul 26, 2021 at 06:14:09AM +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> @KT:
>
> I haven't uploaded it since I'm seeing iwlwifi requesting what appears
> to be a debug-only firmware (iwl-debug-yoyo.bin), that's even requested
> via an aptly-named firmware_request_nowarn() function in
here's the updated debdiff from
11.0.4-1 to 11.0.5-2:
"""
diff -Nru calamares-settings-debian-11.0.4/debian/changelog
calamares-settings-debian-11.0.5/debian/changelog
--- calamares-settings-debian-11.0.4/debian/changelog 2020-11-11
14:54:50.00000 +0200
+++ calamares-settings-debi
w present in the
> sources.list generated by calamares-settings-debian. This patch corrects that.
FTR: the original bug report (#969930 AFAICT) correctly suggested
bullseye-security, so the wrong sources.list entry wasn't caused by
the original bug.
> + * New upstream release
> +(Closes: #991474
h some hardware → firmware mapping. It's not been
> included in the archive yet, see MR#19 for src:firmware-nonfree:
> https://salsa.debian.org/kernel-team/firmware-nonfree/-/merge_requests/19
This was uploaded to unstable, I'm currently waiting for the updated
metadata to show up in th
On Sat, 2021-07-24 at 10:27 +0100, Simon McVittie wrote:
> On Sat, 24 Jul 2021 at 09:05:59 +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> > If we were to go the “(almost) all in” route, it might make sense to
> > either blacklist (some of) those, or to whitelist the known-ok ones,
> > which would require some
Your message dated Sun, 25 Jul 2021 18:47:24 +
with message-id
and subject line unblock calamares-settings-debian
has caused the Debian Bug report #991480,
regarding unblock: calamares-settings-debian/11.0.5
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
X-Debbugs-Cc: j...@debian.org
Please unblock package calamares-settings-debian
[ Reason ]
It has been found today that when the sources.list were updated for the
updated sources.list URI
Hi Paul,
Paul Gevers (2021-07-24):
> On 24-07-2021 09:05, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> > @RT: I'd be happy to have some feedback from your regarding this
> > approach; telling people to enable contrib/non-free so that
> > they can install firmware packages is definitely *not*
> >
Hi Cyril,
On 24-07-2021 09:05, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> @RT: I'd be happy to have some feedback from your regarding this
> approach; telling people to enable contrib/non-free so that they
> can install firmware packages is definitely *not* something I take
> lightly, but I'd be
On Sat, 24 Jul 2021 at 09:05:59 +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> If we were to go the “(almost) all in” route, it might make sense to
> either blacklist (some of) those, or to whitelist the known-ok ones,
> which would require some monitoring of new additions over time (which
> dillon, behind
s were handwaved away somehow.
Practically though, the patches were merged in a timely manner, and
as long as we can rely on that for the duration of a stable release,
we might have a sufficiently good answer for people looking to
complete the Debian installation.
- The issues I fixed in ise
Your message dated Sat, 17 Jul 2021 18:27:31 +
with message-id
and subject line unblock debian-crossgrader
has caused the Debian Bug report #991211,
regarding unblock: debian-crossgrader/0.0.3+nmu3
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package debian-crossgrader
* Purge with --force-remove-protected in the third stage to
avoid failures due to packages that recently became protected.
(Closes
Your message dated Sun, 11 Jul 2021 18:56:26 +
with message-id
and subject line unblock debian-design
has caused the Debian Bug report #990942,
regarding unblock: debian-design/3.0.22
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt
Your message dated Sun, 11 Jul 2021 18:48:08 +
with message-id
and subject line unblock debian-keyring
has caused the Debian Bug report #990936,
regarding unblock: debian-keyring/2021.06.25
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package debian-design
* rebuild using newer boxer-data
(change by Jonas Smedegaard)
This is a manual binNMU for binary-all.
According to debdiff, the only change
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
X-Debbugs-Cc: keyring-ma...@debian.org
Please unblock package debian-keyring
(Please provide enough (but not too much) information to help
the release team to judge the request efficiently
Your message dated Tue, 06 Jul 2021 16:59:30 +
with message-id
and subject line unblock debian-games
has caused the Debian Bug report #990711,
regarding unblock: debian-games/4
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
X-Debbugs-Cc: a...@debian.org
Please unblock package debian-games
[ Reason ]
debian-games is a metapackage that only recommends or suggests games.
This is an update to include the changes
sure it would help avoid some people upgrading remote systems ending
> up being unable to fix them if something goes wrong between configuring
> libc6 and configuring openssh-server. Also CCing debian-release for
> their information, as I know it's pretty late for glibc changes.
I thi
I've proposed
https://salsa.debian.org/glibc-team/glibc/-/merge_requests/3 to fix
this. glibc maintainers, if there's any way to get this into bullseye,
I'm sure it would help avoid some people upgrading remote systems ending
up being unable to fix them if something goes wrong between c
Your message dated Mon, 21 Jun 2021 18:34:20 +
with message-id
and subject line unblock debian-edu
has caused the Debian Bug report #990142,
regarding unblock: debian-edu/2.11.37
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case
Your message dated Mon, 21 Jun 2021 18:30:33 +
with message-id
and subject line unblock debian-edu-config
has caused the Debian Bug report #990139,
regarding unblock: debian-edu-config/2.11.56
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package debian-edu bringing a rather trival improvement to Debian
Edu, which I'd still consider worthwhile having. The potential (bad) impact is
low and definitly limited
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package debian-edu-config 2.11.56 containing three small and
targeded fixes
for three bugs concerning Debian Edu only, thus with no impact outside Debian
Edu.
The diff
Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-b...@lists.debian.org, debian-release@lists.debian.org
(Filing manually since reportbug seems not to like me much today.)
Hi,
Please remove all debian-installer-10-netboot-* binaries, previously
built by src:debian-installer-netboot
On 2021-06-17 12:01, martin.juengl...@t-systems.com wrote:
Hello everyone,
I have a question regarding your support on Debian 10 32bit it
might be a stupid one.
Debian 10 was released July 6th 2019 so the support will end by July
6th 2022.
Wrong: support is based on the date
Hello everyone,
I have a question regarding your support on Debian 10 32bit it might be a
stupid one.
Debian 10 was released July 6th 2019 so the support will end by July 6th 2022.
This year March 27th you guys released Debian 10.9 does that mean the
support is ending in March 2024
Your message dated Wed, 16 Jun 2021 18:34:26 +
with message-id
and subject line unblock debian-installer-netboot-images
has caused the Debian Bug report #989865,
regarding unblock: debian-installer-netboot-images/20210606+fixed1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim
On Tue, Jun 15, 2021 at 12:16:03AM +0200, Holger Levsen wrote:
> A full diff is attached.
a classic, now!
--
cheers,
Holger
⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀
⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ holger@(debian|reproducible-builds|layer-acht).org
⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ OpenPGP: B8BF54137B09D35CF026FE9D 091AB856069AAA1C
⠈⠳⣄
We are done with ‘wo
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package debian-installer-netboot-images, it includes the images
to netboot bullseye d-i RC2, it's used by the education-main-server package at
least ;)
I'm not planning
Your message dated Mon, 14 Jun 2021 20:05:08 +
with message-id
and subject line unblock debian-edu-install
has caused the Debian Bug report #989483,
regarding unblock: debian-edu-install/2.11.13
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt
Your message dated Sat, 05 Jun 2021 22:58:52 +
with message-id
and subject line unblock debian-edu-doc
has caused the Debian Bug report #989484,
regarding unblock: debian-edu-doc/2.11.24
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt
Holger Levsen (2021-06-05):
> Please unblock package debian-edu-install 2.11.13 - it has been in unstable
> for
> 12 days without any new problems reported. Also it's only used by d-i in
> Debian
> Edu mode, thus it shouldn't have any impact outside Debian Edu, yet it is a
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package debian-edu-doc 2.11.24, it just contains documentation
and translation updates.
debian-edu-doc (2.11.24) unstable; urgency=medium
.
* Update Debian Edu Bullseye
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package debian-edu-install 2.11.13 - it has been in unstable for
12 days without any new problems reported. Also it's only used by d-i in Debian
Edu mode, thus it shouldn't
Your message dated Fri, 21 May 2021 20:37:53 +
with message-id
and subject line unblock debian-edu-artwork-legacy
has caused the Debian Bug report #988902,
regarding unblock: debian-edu-artwork-legacy/20201210-3
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-...@lists.debian.org
Please unblock package debian-edu-artwork-legacy
Unfortunately, I did two consecutive uploads as I failed to run git-pull
before implementing my
Ping to the debian-release bug. Do you want me to upload a fix to
this bug where e2fsprogs fails its regression test (and thus its
package build) when armhf and armel are running on a 64-bit ARM
platform, but they were built successfully when run on a 32-bit ARM
builder?
No question
On Fri, May 14, 2021 at 08:06:06PM +, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
> This is an automatic notification regarding your Bug report
> which was filed against the release.debian.org package:
> #988372: unblock: debian-edu-config/2.11.55
[...]
> On 11-05-2021 15:22, Holger
Your message dated Fri, 14 May 2021 22:03:55 +0200
with message-id
and subject line Re: Bug#988372: unblock: debian-edu-config/2.11.55
has caused the Debian Bug report #988372,
regarding unblock: debian-edu-config/2.11.55
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been
Your message dated Thu, 13 May 2021 09:41:28 +
with message-id
and subject line unblock debian-cd
has caused the Debian Bug report #988192,
regarding unblock: debian-cd/3.1.34
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package debian-edu-config 2.11.54. It fixes 3 important bugs
for Debian Edu and has no impact outside of Debian Edu, yet it's a key package
and thus needs an unblock. It's
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package debian-cd 3.1.34 as that's the version currently in use
on cdimage.debian.org to build bullseye images. The changes are straightforward,
trivial, tested and been
Your message dated Thu, 6 May 2021 13:39:03 +0200
with message-id
and subject line Re: Bug#987992: unblock: debian-edu-doc/2.11.23
has caused the Debian Bug report #987992,
regarding unblock: debian-edu-doc/2.11.23
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
X-Debbugs-Cc: Debian Med Packaging Team
Please unblock package debian-med
As in all release processes we need to update metapackages of Blends to
reflect the packaging pool (after late
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package debian-edu-doc it just contains documentation and
translation updates and a little enhancement to Suggests: in d/control:
diff -Nru debian-edu-doc-2.11.22/debian
Your message dated Sun, 02 May 2021 09:49:51 +
with message-id
and subject line unblock debian-reference
has caused the Debian Bug report #987863,
regarding unblock: debian-reference/2.78
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package debian-reference
[ Reason ]
Need to be unblocked since this is a key package
[ Impact ]
1. Miss translation updates (es, zh_CN, nb, it, po)
2. Miss updates for CUPS
Your message dated Fri, 30 Apr 2021 21:47:04 +0200
with message-id <568ba920-3e8c-82aa-8fed-132afe192...@debian.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#987783: unblock: debian-edu-install/2.11.12
has caused the Debian Bug report #987783,
regarding unblock: debian-edu-install/2.11.12
to be marked a
On Thu, Apr 29, 2021 at 02:21:07PM +0200, Holger Levsen wrote:
> Please unblock package debian-edu-install 2.11.12 which fixes a bug by
> increasing partitioning sizes preventing installation in certain situations.
I forgot to mention the package contains an udeb, which is not used by
the d
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package debian-edu-install 2.11.12 which fixes a bug by
increasing partitioning sizes preventing installation in certain situations.
+debian-edu-install (2.11.12) unstable
[ Holger Levsen, 2021-04-21 ]
> we should add autopkgtests to debian-edu-doc to ensure each document
> has been built for the three formats pdf, epub and html.
>
> another condition is that every debian-edu-doc-* package should
> contain at least one document, unless
[Holger Levsen]
> I'll guess I'll invent something myself then...
What about looking for selected keywords like 'Debian Edu', 'Skolelinux,
"$(lsb_release -c -s)" or similar by grepping the documentation files,
to ensure the content is somewhat relevant? And perhaps linting the
HTML
past
and it would be nice to catch those automatically. I'll guess I'll invent
something myself then...
--
cheers,
Holger
⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀
⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ holger@(debian|reproducible-builds|layer-acht).org
⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ OpenPGP: B8BF54137B09D35CF026FE9D 091AB856069AAA1C
⠈⠳⣄
There are no jobs on a de
Your message dated Tue, 20 Apr 2021 20:18:39 +
with message-id
and subject line unblock openstack-debian-images
has caused the Debian Bug report #987190,
regarding unblock: openstack-debian-images/1.60
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt
Hi Holger,
On 19-04-2021 10:56, Holger Levsen wrote:
>> The excuses says it's blocked because it "does not have autopkgtest".
>
> speaking of which, what would be a non superficial autopkgtest for
> debian-edu-doc? would be running "file" on all created ht
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Dear release team,
Please unblock package openstack-debian-images
The version currently in Testing doesn't setup bonding correctly: there
are entries in /etc/network/interfaces
Hi Paul,
On Sat, Apr 17, 2021 at 09:57:38PM +0200, Paul Gevers wrote:
> On Thu, 15 Apr 2021 02:23:22 +0200 Holger Levsen wrote:
> > Please unblock package debian-edu-doc 2.11.22, it adds a new translation
> > and thus
> > a new binary package and won't migrate on its ow
Your message dated Thu, 15 Apr 2021 18:25:33 +
with message-id
and subject line unblock openstack-debian-images
has caused the Debian Bug report #987006,
regarding unblock: openstack-debian-images/1.59
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt
Your message dated Thu, 15 Apr 2021 18:26:28 +
with message-id
and subject line unblock debian-edu
has caused the Debian Bug report #986980,
regarding unblock: debian-edu/2.11.36
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package openstack-debian-images
Background:
openstack-debian-images isn't only used for creating cloud images as
in cdimage.debian.org, it is also used by openstack-cluster
Your message dated Thu, 15 Apr 2021 09:52:12 +
with message-id
and subject line unblock debian-edu-config
has caused the Debian Bug report #986983,
regarding unblock: debian-edu-config/2.11.54
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt
Your message dated Thu, 15 Apr 2021 09:50:35 +
with message-id
and subject line unblock debian-edu-artwork
has caused the Debian Bug report #986982,
regarding unblock: debian-edu-artwork/2.11.5-3
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt
hi,
it seems this bug report didn't make it through to the lists
because of the attachment's size:
Subject: unblock: debian-edu-doc/2.11.22
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package debian-edu-doc 2.11.22
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
x-debbugs: debian-...@lists.debian.org
Please unblock package debian-edu-config, which (like d-e-artwork in the
previous bugreport) is a key package and as such wont migrate itself
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package debian-edu-artwork it fixes an important policy
violation flagged by piuparts:
$ debdiff debian-edu-artwork_2.11.5-2.dsc debian-edu-artwork_2.11.5-3.dsc
diff -Nru
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package debian-edu 2.11.36 which just changes a few meta
packaging relationships but needs a manual unblock because it's a key
package.
$ debdiff debian-edu_2.11.35.dsc
Hi Ivo
On Sun, Apr 11, 2021 at 12:39:05PM +, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 03, 2021 at 09:29:03PM +0200, Paul Gevers wrote:
> > What do you mean with "it's too late for that"? We *could* (not saying
> > we should) drop the package.
> I added
Your message dated Sun, 11 Apr 2021 14:38:09 +0200
with message-id <20210411123807.ga5...@debian.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#986311: unblock: debian-cloud-images/0.0.4
has caused the Debian Bug report #986311,
regarding unblock: debian-cloud-images/0.0.4
to be marked as done.
This
Dear SRM colleagues,
Your input/confirmation is appreciated on the following issue. tl;dr;
are you OK with updating debian-cloud-images in the stable release?
On 03-04-2021 21:29, Paul Gevers wrote:
> Hi Noah,
>
> On 03-04-2021 17:44, Noah Meyerhans wrote:
>> It is sufficient
llseye if we
>> don't update it?
>
> IMO, debian-cloud-images should never have been packaged in Debian in
> the first place, given that there was no plan to maintain it in the
> archive and that a "stable" packaged version of it bears only a passing
> relationship to
nd
> drop the package from testing. After that we'll stop updating packages
> in stable and just fake them into official Debian releases without any
> chance of security updates. Would you consider that a better solution?
You sound a bit harsh, please assume good faith. Let me at least
stable and just fake them into official Debian releases without any
chance of security updates. Would you consider that a better solution?
Regards,
Bastian
--
Most legends have their basis in facts.
-- Kirk, "And The Children Shall Lead", stardate 5029.5
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 - moreinfo
Bug #986311 [release.debian.org] unblock: debian-cloud-images/0.0.4
Removed tag(s) moreinfo.
--
986311: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=986311
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
ny users
> > who might be generating their own images based on our configuration.
>
> So, I'm very uncomfortable with the union of this key packages tracking
> package and the actual snapshot package. debian-cloud-images:all is a
> new upstream release which doesn't follow our freeze polic
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
Hi Noah,
On 02-04-2021 22:00, Noah Meyerhans wrote:
> Please unblock package debian-cloud-images
172 files changed, 3798 insertions(+), 1365 deletions(-)
> Primarily I'm requesting this because this source package provides the
> debian-cloud-images-package
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 moreinfo
Bug #986311 [release.debian.org] unblock: debian-cloud-images/0.0.4
Added tag(s) moreinfo.
--
986311: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=986311
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package debian-cloud-images
Primarily I'm requesting this because this source package provides the
debian-cloud-images-packages package that is a key package (see
https
Your message dated Wed, 24 Mar 2021 21:52:38 +0100
with message-id
and subject line Re: Bug#985789: unblock: openstack-debian-images/1.58
has caused the Debian Bug report #985789,
regarding unblock: openstack-debian-images/1.58
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package openstack-debian-images
openstack-debian-images these days, is mostly used by my
openstack-cluster-installer for setting-up bare-metal nodes. Currently,
without
unsubscribe
пн, 22 мар. 2021 г. в 23:26, Adam D. Barratt :
>
> ----
> Debian Stable Updates Announcement SUA 197-1
> https://www.debian.org/
> debian-release@lists.debian.org
> <https://www.debi
package release.debian.org
tags 985371 = buster pending
thanks
Hi,
The upload referenced by this bug report has been flagged for acceptance into
the proposed-updates queue for Debian buster.
Thanks for your contribution!
Upload details
==
Package: debian-archive-keyring
Version
ter-pu: package
debian-archive-keyring/2019.1+deb10u1
Added tag(s) pending.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
985371: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=985371
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
On Tue, Mar 16, 2021 at 8:06 PM Luís Fernando Russo Alves wrote:
> Venho através desse caminho para suporte do Debian10 Buster ...
Please contact support for help using Debian.
[Tradução automática] Entre em contato com o suporte para obter ajuda
usando o Debian:
https://www.debian.
Olá,
Sou Luis Fernando
Venho através desse caminho para suporte do Debian10 Buster devido a
configuração da *sources.list, *não esta funcionando, ja pesquisei na
internet, peço suporte pois quero instalar os pacote do debian não está
funcionando não baixar os pacote (Squid3, Apache2 e Firewall
Your message dated Tue, 16 Mar 2021 17:19:54 +0100
with message-id <20210316161953.ga3...@debian.org>
and subject line Re: unblock: debian-pan/0.3
has caused the Debian Bug report #985191,
regarding unblock: debian-pan/0.3
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem ha
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
X-Debbugs-Cc: pi...@debian.org
Please unblock package debian-pan
it is a Debian blends, the objectif od this blends is to package
softwares for synchrotron and neutron facilities.
https
Your message dated Thu, 11 Mar 2021 22:23:41 +
with message-id
and subject line unblock debian-science
has caused the Debian Bug report #984882,
regarding unblock: debian-science/1.14.1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 - moreinfo
Bug #984882 [release.debian.org] unblock: debian-science/1.14.1
Removed tag(s) moreinfo.
--
984882: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=984882
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
l be part
of the release). This is the established procedure over several
releases.
Kind regards and thanks for your work for the release team
Andreas.
--
http://fam-tille.de
debian-science_1.13-1.14.1.debdiff.gz
Description: application/gzip
Control: tags -1 + moreinfo
Hi Andreas
On Tue, 9 Mar 2021 at 19:03, Andreas Tille wrote:
> [ ] attach debdiff against the package in testing
> (I do not see any reason for a debdiff of the autogenerated package)
Autogenerated or not, the debdiff is the thing we need to review, in
order
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 + moreinfo
Bug #984882 [release.debian.org] unblock: debian-science/1.14.1
Added tag(s) moreinfo.
--
984882: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=984882
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Dear Sir,
How are you? This is Catherine from Beijing ZONGZHIHECHENG Technology Co.,Ltd.
in China, we specialize in CCTV camera designing manufacturing. We offer
IP camera, AHD camera, POE camera, etc.
Our company was established in 2006, and it is one of the global high-tech
manufacturers in
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-science-maintain...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Please unblock package debian-science
(Please provide enough (but not too much) information to help
the release team
Your message dated Sat, 6 Mar 2021 21:46:35 +0100
with message-id <81548a07-16cf-8d97-478f-17b71fa8f...@debian.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#984605: unblock: debian-edu-config/2.11.51
has caused the Debian Bug report #984605,
regarding unblock: debian-edu-config/2.11.51
to be marked a
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
x-debbugs-cc: debian-...@lists.debian.org
Hi,
please unblock package debian-edu-config, the debdiff is small and self
explaining
and fixes an important bug:
$ debdiff debian-edu
Package: debian-policy
Version: 4.5.1.0
Severity: normal
Hi,
I know this is very obvious, but if you read
* https://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#severities and
* https://release.debian.org/testing/rc_policy.txt
it seems as if it should be listed somewhere in the policy that package
downgrades
Hi,
On 31-01-2021 18:43, Shengjing Zhu wrote:
> It might be the time to resume the discussion...
> Dear ftpmaster, will the task that imports all sources to
> security-master be ready for bullseye?
I think this is a fair question. What's the status on the archive side
of things? (A "no" or
ernd Zeimetz Debian GNU/Linux Developer
http://bzed.dehttp://www.debian.org
GPG Fingerprint: ECA1 E3F2 8E11 2432 D485 DD95 EB36 171A 6FF9 435F
501 - 600 of 3482 matches
Mail list logo
