Re: Decoupling GNOME 2.30 transitions

2010-05-25 Thread Yves-Alexis Perez
On sam., 2010-05-15 at 17:09 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: On Sun, 2010-03-28 at 13:54 +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote: 4 - evolution gtkhtml3.14 Sourceful uploads: evolution evolution-data-server evolution-exchange evolution-rss gtkhtml3.14

Re: Decoupling GNOME 2.30 transitions

2010-05-25 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Tue, 2010-05-25 at 08:01 +0200, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote: I hope my command line is good, I noticed that binNMU'ing only packages build-depending directly on libedataserver-dev wasn't enough, here my new attempt (alternatively, if you have a way to say “rebuild everything using

Re: Decoupling GNOME 2.30 transitions

2010-05-20 Thread Yves-Alexis Perez
On mer., 2010-05-19 at 11:40 +0200, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote: evolution-rss just uploaded to unstable -- Yves-Alexis signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Re: Decoupling GNOME 2.30 transitions

2010-05-18 Thread Yves-Alexis Perez
On sam., 2010-05-15 at 17:09 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: Sourceful uploads: evolution evolution-data-server gtkhtml3.14 Could we have binNMUs for depending packages? apt-rbdepends is: apt-rbdepends () { grep-dctrl -F Build-Depends $1 -s Package

Re: Decoupling GNOME 2.30 transitions

2010-05-18 Thread Josselin Mouette
Le mardi 18 mai 2010 à 08:29 +0200, Yves-Alexis Perez a écrit : evolution-exchange this one FTBFS with an error I've not yet investigated: Making all in addressbook make[3]: Entering directory `/tmp/buildd/evolution-exchange-2.30.1/addressbook' /bin/sh ../libtool --tag=CC

Re: Decoupling GNOME 2.30 transitions

2010-05-18 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Tue, May 18, 2010 07:55, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote: On sam., 2010-05-15 at 17:09 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: Sourceful uploads: evolution evolution-data-server gtkhtml3.14 Could we have binNMUs for depending packages? Of course. :-) apt-rbdepends

Re: Decoupling GNOME 2.30 transitions

2010-05-18 Thread Yves-Alexis Perez
On 18/05/2010 14:28, Josselin Mouette wrote: Le mardi 18 mai 2010 à 08:29 +0200, Yves-Alexis Perez a écrit : evolution-exchange this one FTBFS with an error I've not yet investigated: Making all in addressbook make[3]: Entering directory

Re: Decoupling GNOME 2.30 transitions

2010-05-18 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Sat, 2010-05-15 at 17:09 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: On Sun, 2010-03-28 at 13:54 +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote: 4 - evolution gtkhtml3.14 [...] Binary NMUs (hopefully): Of those that have been attempted so far, there are a few FTBFS: libopensync-plugin-evolution2 - #582148

Re: Decoupling GNOME 2.30 transitions

2010-05-15 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Sun, 2010-03-28 at 13:54 +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote: 4 - evolution gtkhtml3.14 Sourceful uploads: evolution evolution-data-server evolution-exchange evolution-rss gtkhtml3.14 Please go ahead with these. Binary NMUs (hopefully): [...]

Re: Decoupling GNOME 2.30 transitions

2010-05-03 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Sun, March 28, 2010 12:54, Josselin Mouette wrote: 3 - totem-pl-parser (libtotem-plparser12 → libtotem-plparser17) + evince (libevince1 → libevince2) As discussed on IRC, please go ahead with these: Sourceful uploads: brasero evince gnome-python-desktop

Re: Decoupling GNOME 2.30 transitions

2010-05-03 Thread Josselin Mouette
Le lundi 03 mai 2010 à 14:51 +0200, Sebastian Dröge a écrit : On Mon, 2010-05-03 at 11:39 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: On Sun, March 28, 2010 12:54, Josselin Mouette wrote: 3 - totem-pl-parser (libtotem-plparser12 → libtotem-plparser17) + evince (libevince1 → libevince2) As

Re: Decoupling GNOME 2.30 transitions

2010-05-03 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Mon, 2010-05-03 at 23:40 +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote: Only remaining are binNMUs for tracker and rhythmbox against libtotem-plparser17. Scheduled. Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact

Re: Decoupling GNOME 2.30 transitions

2010-04-27 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Sun, 2010-03-28 at 13:54 +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote: 2 - gnome-desktop (libgnome-desktop-2-11 → libgnome-desktop-2-17) Binary NMUs: These have been scheduled, with the couple of exceptions noted. avant-window-navigator awn-extras-applets beagle cheese

Re: Decoupling GNOME 2.30 transitions

2010-04-26 Thread Adam D. Barratt
Hi, On Sun, 2010-03-28 at 13:54 +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote: 2 - gnome-desktop (libgnome-desktop-2-11 → libgnome-desktop-2-17) Please go ahead with these: Sourceful uploads: control-center gnome-settings-daemon nautilus gnome-shell (can't be binNMUed

Re: Decoupling GNOME 2.30 transitions

2010-04-09 Thread Adam D. Barratt
[Correct xfce maintainer address] On Fri, 2010-04-09 at 06:26 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: On Fri, 2010-04-09 at 00:59 +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote: Le jeudi 08 avril 2010 à 22:02 +0100, Adam D. Barratt a écrit : On Sun, 2010-03-28 at 13:54 +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote: 1 -

Re: Decoupling GNOME 2.30 transitions

2010-04-08 Thread Adam D. Barratt
[dropped debian-devel from Cc] Hi, On Sun, 2010-03-28 at 13:54 +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote: 1 - libxklavier (libxklavier15 → libxklavier16) Sourceful uploads: gnome-settings-daemon (2.28+patch, not 2.30) libgnomekbd xfce4-settings xfce4-xkb-plugin

Re: Decoupling GNOME 2.30 transitions

2010-04-08 Thread Josselin Mouette
Le jeudi 08 avril 2010 à 22:02 +0100, Adam D. Barratt a écrit : On Sun, 2010-03-28 at 13:54 +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote: 1 - libxklavier (libxklavier15 → libxklavier16) Uploaded. Sourceful uploads: gnome-settings-daemon (2.28+patch, not 2.30) libgnomekbd Both

Re: Decoupling GNOME 2.30 transitions

2010-04-08 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Fri, 2010-04-09 at 00:59 +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote: Le jeudi 08 avril 2010 à 22:02 +0100, Adam D. Barratt a écrit : On Sun, 2010-03-28 at 13:54 +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote: 1 - libxklavier (libxklavier15 → libxklavier16) [...] Binary NMUs: cairo-dock-plugins

Re: Decoupling GNOME 2.30 transitions

2010-04-02 Thread Luca Bruno
Josselin Mouette scrisse: *I urge anyone maintaining packages in the following lists to not upload these packages to unstable without double-checking with the release team and/or the GNOME team.* 2 - gnome-desktop (libgnome-desktop-2-11 → libgnome-desktop-2-17) Binary NMUs:

Decoupling GNOME 2.30 transitions

2010-03-28 Thread Josselin Mouette
Hi, since GNOME 2.30 is the target for squeeze, there are a few remaining transitions to set up. If we do them all at once, it will become an awful nightmare and might delay the release, so they must be sequenced in order. *I urge anyone maintaining packages in the following lists to not upload