OK, I'm trying to figure out the holdups with this. So much depends on libxml2
that it seems worth removing a few things from 'testing' to get it in ASAP.
rubrica
---
Ties the whole thing into the python2.3 transition.
Suggestion: Remove from testing temporarily to allow these transitions
to
On Sat, Oct 11, 2003 at 01:48:19PM -0400, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
OK, I'm trying to figure out the holdups with this. So much depends on
libxml2
that it seems worth removing a few things from 'testing' to get it in ASAP.
rubrica
---
Ties the whole thing into the python2.3 transition.
On Sat, Oct 11, 2003 at 01:48:19PM -0400, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
OK, I'm trying to figure out the holdups with this. So much depends on
libxml2
that it seems worth removing a few things from 'testing' to get it in ASAP.
rubrica
---
I don't think this is a problem any more. The
On Sat, Oct 11, 2003 at 11:16:03PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
Steve Langasek writes:
whether it will happen before python2.3 is ready in its own right. The
python2.3 transition is probably a little over 10 days out at this
point.
why 10 days? are these packages entering unstable from
Steve Langasek writes:
On Sat, Oct 11, 2003 at 11:16:03PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
Steve Langasek writes:
whether it will happen before python2.3 is ready in its own right. The
python2.3 transition is probably a little over 10 days out at this
point.
why 10 days? are these
5 matches
Mail list logo