Getting libxml2/lixslt into testing -- remove suggestions

2003-10-11 Thread Nathanael Nerode
OK, I'm trying to figure out the holdups with this. So much depends on libxml2 that it seems worth removing a few things from 'testing' to get it in ASAP. rubrica --- Ties the whole thing into the python2.3 transition. Suggestion: Remove from testing temporarily to allow these transitions to

Re: Getting libxml2/lixslt into testing -- remove suggestions

2003-10-11 Thread Steve Langasek
On Sat, Oct 11, 2003 at 01:48:19PM -0400, Nathanael Nerode wrote: OK, I'm trying to figure out the holdups with this. So much depends on libxml2 that it seems worth removing a few things from 'testing' to get it in ASAP. rubrica --- Ties the whole thing into the python2.3 transition.

Re: Getting libxml2/lixslt into testing -- remove suggestions

2003-10-11 Thread Colin Watson
On Sat, Oct 11, 2003 at 01:48:19PM -0400, Nathanael Nerode wrote: OK, I'm trying to figure out the holdups with this. So much depends on libxml2 that it seems worth removing a few things from 'testing' to get it in ASAP. rubrica --- I don't think this is a problem any more. The

Re: Getting libxml2/lixslt into testing -- remove suggestions

2003-10-11 Thread Steve Langasek
On Sat, Oct 11, 2003 at 11:16:03PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote: Steve Langasek writes: whether it will happen before python2.3 is ready in its own right. The python2.3 transition is probably a little over 10 days out at this point. why 10 days? are these packages entering unstable from

Re: Getting libxml2/lixslt into testing -- remove suggestions

2003-10-11 Thread Matthias Klose
Steve Langasek writes: On Sat, Oct 11, 2003 at 11:16:03PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote: Steve Langasek writes: whether it will happen before python2.3 is ready in its own right. The python2.3 transition is probably a little over 10 days out at this point. why 10 days? are these