On Fri, 18 Jul 2008, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
Ruby 1.9 is still the development version of Ruby, but it will become
the stable version in december. It's not really cutting-edge stuff
anymore, and works very well everywhere else.
I'm a bit annoyed by this issue: the problem seems to be a kernel
On Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 03:37:06PM +0200, Peter Palfrader wrote:
On Fri, 18 Jul 2008, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
Ruby 1.9 is still the development version of Ruby, but it will become
the stable version in december. It's not really cutting-edge stuff
anymore, and works very well everywhere else.
On Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 05:17:02PM +0200, Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
On Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 03:37:06PM +0200, Peter Palfrader wrote:
On Fri, 18 Jul 2008, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
Ruby 1.9 is still the development version of Ruby, but it will become
the stable version in december. It's not
I seem to recall volunteering to admin these boxes, since it was pretty
obvious that no one was giving them any love, but it fell on deaf ears.
The boxes have admins that are keeping them up to date, what is needed is a
working kernel with security updates.
I remember you (or maybe thibaut?)
4 matches
Mail list logo
