Your message dated Sun, 17 Jul 2016 06:12:00 +
with message-id <077ecd96-5b27-5ec8-8824-2acf7b73d...@thykier.net>
and subject line Re: release.debian.org: missing hints file 'freeze'
has caused the Debian Bug report #830871,
regarding release.debian.org: missing hints file '
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
Hi,
On https://release.debian.org/britney/hints/ there's a link to a
'freeze' file, but that link doesn't work (404 error).
This breaks UDD's hints importer.
Full IRC log from #debian-release:
13:31 < lucas> hi
13:31 < lucas&
On 08/12/15 17:12, Andreas Tille wrote:
> it would be great if you could add the hints for hdf5 to enable
> migration of netcdf and libsis-jhdf5-java to testing.
The strict dependencies in hdf5 libs prevent smooth transitions:
libhdf5-cpp-10 depends on libhdf5-10 (= 1.8.15-patch1+docs-5)
l
Hi,
it would be great if you could add the hints for hdf5 to enable
migration of netcdf and libsis-jhdf5-java to testing.
Kind regards and thanks for your work as release team
Andreas.
--
http://fam-tille.de
Your message dated Fri, 06 Nov 2015 12:27:24 +
with message-id <1446812844.2080.8.ca...@adam-barratt.org.uk>
and subject line Re: Bug#656144: hint: "clean" does not properly check
arch-specific hints
has caused the Debian Bug report #656144,
regarding hint: "clean&quo
Hi people,
here's a single round of unblock/unblock-udeb/urgent hints for the
upcoming d-i upload. It's what we would normally either call RC4 or
final or something like this, but I don't think it makes sense to
announce it separately. Announcing Jessie is way better. ;)
For those on #debian
On 2015-04-22 12:52, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
Hi people,
here's a single round of unblock/unblock-udeb/urgent hints for the
upcoming d-i upload. It's what we would normally either call RC4 or
final or something like this, but I don't think it makes sense to
announce it separately. Announcing
On 2015-04-18 12:00, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
Samuel Thibault sthiba...@debian.org (2015-04-18):
Cyril Brulebois, le Sat 18 Apr 2015 04:57:35 +0200, a écrit :
All are in, including installation-guide; thanks everyone!
Mmm, brltty didn't make it, it's waiting for 2 days.
No it's not, there's a
Cyril Brulebois, le Sat 18 Apr 2015 04:57:35 +0200, a écrit :
All are in, including installation-guide; thanks everyone!
Mmm, brltty didn't make it, it's waiting for 2 days.
Samuel
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble?
Samuel Thibault sthiba...@debian.org (2015-04-18):
Cyril Brulebois, le Sat 18 Apr 2015 04:57:35 +0200, a écrit :
All are in, including installation-guide; thanks everyone!
Mmm, brltty didn't make it, it's waiting for 2 days.
No it's not, there's a urgent hint for that. The missing armel
Cyril Brulebois, le Sat 18 Apr 2015 12:00:32 +0200, a écrit :
Samuel Thibault sthiba...@debian.org (2015-04-18):
Cyril Brulebois, le Sat 18 Apr 2015 04:57:35 +0200, a écrit :
All are in, including installation-guide; thanks everyone!
Mmm, brltty didn't make it, it's waiting for 2 days.
Ivo De Decker iv...@debian.org (2015-04-17):
As noted on irc: when there are no new lines in dmesg, the timestamp is empty,
and on the next run, the entire dmesg is used. This is probably still better
than what was done before, so added the hints anyway.
Good catch, thanks. Documented in a bug
Cyril Brulebois, le Fri 17 Apr 2015 19:52:07 +0200, a écrit :
here's a fifth (and hopefully last) round of unblock/unblock-udeb hints
for the upcoming d-i jessie RC3. Don't hesitate to ask questions if
anything looks fishy. I've added urgents this time, to meet the
timeline I've proposed
hw-detect/1.108
As noted on irc: when there are no new lines in dmesg, the timestamp is empty,
and on the next run, the entire dmesg is used. This is probably still better
than what was done before, so added the hints anyway.
# stop polluting /etc/fstab with USB things:
unblock partman-target
Hi people,
here's a fifth (and hopefully last) round of unblock/unblock-udeb hints
for the upcoming d-i jessie RC3. Don't hesitate to ask questions if
anything looks fishy. I've added urgents this time, to meet the
timeline I've proposed
(https://lists.debian.org/debian-boot/2015/04/msg00264
Cyril Brulebois k...@debian.org (2015-04-17):
# improve firmware support, avoiding loops (#779546); just uploaded,
# hopefully builds will be there on time:
unblock hw-detect/1.108
unblock-udeb hw-detect/1.108
urgent hw-detect/1.108
# stop polluting /etc/fstab with USB things:
unblock
Cyril Brulebois k...@debian.org (2015-04-17):
Hi people,
here's a fifth (and hopefully last) round of unblock/unblock-udeb hints
for the upcoming d-i jessie RC3. Don't hesitate to ask questions if
anything looks fishy. I've added urgents this time, to meet the
timeline I've proposed
Hi,
On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 02:26:22AM +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
here's a third round of unblock/unblock-udeb hints for the upcoming d-i
jessie RC3. Don't hesitate to ask questions if anything looks fishy.
I've added urgents this time, to meet the timeline I've proposed
(https
Hi people,
here's a forth round of unblock/unblock-udeb hints for the upcoming d-i
jessie RC3. Don't hesitate to ask questions if anything looks fishy.
I've added urgents this time, to meet the timeline I've proposed
(https://lists.debian.org/debian-boot/2015/04/msg00264.html).
(I've uploaded
Ivo De Decker iv...@debian.org (2015-04-15):
On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 11:47:40PM +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
here's a forth round of unblock/unblock-udeb hints for the upcoming d-i
jessie RC3. Don't hesitate to ask questions if anything looks fishy.
I've added urgents this time, to meet
Hi,
On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 11:47:40PM +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
here's a forth round of unblock/unblock-udeb hints for the upcoming d-i
jessie RC3. Don't hesitate to ask questions if anything looks fishy.
I've added urgents this time, to meet the timeline I've proposed
(https
Hi people,
here's a third round of unblock/unblock-udeb hints for the upcoming d-i
jessie RC3. Don't hesitate to ask questions if anything looks fishy.
I've added urgents this time, to meet the timeline I've proposed
(https://lists.debian.org/debian-boot/2015/04/msg00264.html).
# l10n-only
Quoting Cyril Brulebois (k...@debian.org):
Hi people,
here's a third round of unblock/unblock-udeb hints for the upcoming d-i
jessie RC3. Don't hesitate to ask questions if anything looks fishy.
I've added urgents this time, to meet the timeline I've proposed
(https://lists.debian.org
Ivo De Decker wrote:
On Thu, Apr 09, 2015 at 11:09:13PM +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
# no objections for d-i (kfreebsd-specific), but please check with BSD
# guys (cc'd) before the matching unblock:
unblock-udeb kfreebsd-10/10.1~svn274115-4
Added all of these. For kfreebsd, the unblock
Hi,
On Sun, Apr 12, 2015 at 02:34:42PM +0100, Steven Chamberlain wrote:
Added all of these. For kfreebsd, the unblock is still needed.
Please feel free to unblock, it has security fixes only.
Unblocked.
Cheers,
Ivo
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
Hi people,
here's a second round of unblock/unblock-udeb hints for the upcoming d-i
jessie RC3. Don't hesitate to ask questions if anything looks fishy. Feel
free to age packages if you wish. Also, I've seen the linux upload but I
won't have time to play with until after the mini DebConf in Lyon
Hi people,
here's a first round of unblock/unblock-udeb hints for the upcoming d-i
jessie RC3. Don't hesitate to ask questions if anything looks fishy.
Please note that some are just unblock (installation-guide) or just
unblock-udeb (systemd) and that doesn't count as fishy (despite `date
On Wed, 2015-04-01 at 20:02 +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
here's a first round of unblock/unblock-udeb hints for the upcoming d-i
jessie RC3. Don't hesitate to ask questions if anything looks fishy.
Please note that some are just unblock (installation-guide) or just
unblock-udeb (systemd
On 2015-03-19 03:09, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
[...]
Thank you. Could we get those added as well please?
# fix for nasty bug #778773:
unblock partman-base/183
unblock-udeb partman-base/183
# no objection from d-i PoV at first glance:
unblock-udeb openssh/1:6.7p1-4
Ack, approved
Hi,
here's another list of stuff that would be nice to unblock. Feel free to
urgent anything (from this list or from the previous ones), so that we
don't get previous hints obsoleted.
# update master list + l10n:
unblock choose-mirror/2.61
unblock-udeb choose-mirror/2.61
# l10n:
unblock clock
On 2015-03-18 16:25, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
Hi,
here's another list of stuff that would be nice to unblock. Feel free to
urgent anything (from this list or from the previous ones), so that we
don't get previous hints obsoleted.
[...]
Mraw,
KiBi.
Unblocked, thanks.
~Niels
Niels Thykier ni...@thykier.net (2015-03-18):
On 2015-03-18 16:25, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
Hi,
here's another list of stuff that would be nice to unblock. Feel free to
urgent anything (from this list or from the previous ones), so that we
don't get previous hints obsoleted
### l10n + one compiler pacification:
wrt l10n, I'm left with two packages now:
- choose-mirror, which I have trouble compiling, no idea why. Notice
that I tried to update its embarked Mirrors.masterlist, which is
something we probably want for Jessie
- console-setup that had some more
Hi,
Ivo De Decker iv...@debian.org (2015-03-10):
On Mon, Mar 09, 2015 at 09:22:13PM +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
The rest is (almost) only about l10n.
All unblocked. Most of them are urgency low, I can age them if you
want.
Thanks. No need to urgent them, I'll do so if/when they become a
Hi,
here's another list of unblock and/or unblock-udeb for d-i. Please note
that I'm only not-objecting to lvm2, I didn't extensively review it.
Ben also mentioned initramfs-tools past week, which you might want to
consider. I've added Ben to Cc so that he can comment on both as
appropriate. The
Hi,
On Mon, Mar 09, 2015 at 09:22:13PM +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
here's another list of unblock and/or unblock-udeb for d-i. Please note
that I'm only not-objecting to lvm2, I didn't extensively review it.
I unblocked it. Ben, is there a specific reason you didn't include the fix for
On Tue, 2015-03-10 at 00:13 +0100, Ivo De Decker wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, Mar 09, 2015 at 09:22:13PM +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
here's another list of unblock and/or unblock-udeb for d-i. Please note
that I'm only not-objecting to lvm2, I didn't extensively review it.
I unblocked it. Ben,
Michael Gilbert mgilb...@debian.org (2015-03-08):
On Thu, Mar 5, 2015 at 1:07 AM, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
Hi people,
here's a first round of unblock/unblock-udeb hints for the upcoming d-i
jessie RC2. Don't hesitate to ask questions if anything looks fishy.
Cyril,
Would
On Thu, Mar 5, 2015 at 1:07 AM, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
Hi people,
here's a first round of unblock/unblock-udeb hints for the upcoming d-i
jessie RC2. Don't hesitate to ask questions if anything looks fishy.
Cyril,
Would it be possible also to unblock ndisc6 in time for RC2? I saw
On Sat, 2015-03-07 at 14:21 +0100, Karsten Merker wrote:
I have just looked at the migration status for linux 3.16.7-ckt7-1
at https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/linux:
* 5 days old (needed 5 days)
* Not touching package due to block-udeb request by freeze (check
Karsten Merker mer...@debian.org (2015-03-06):
On Thu, Mar 05, 2015 at 07:07:27AM +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
Hi people,
here's a first round of unblock/unblock-udeb hints for the upcoming d-i
jessie RC2. Don't hesitate to ask questions if anything looks fishy.
Hello,
could you
Cyril Brulebois, le Thu 05 Mar 2015 07:07:27 +0100, a écrit :
here's a first round of unblock/unblock-udeb hints for the upcoming d-i
jessie RC2. Don't hesitate to ask questions if anything looks fishy.
Can we also perhaps unblock tasksel/3.30? It removes old dependencies,
fixes desktop
On 2015-03-05 12:16, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
Samuel Thibault sthiba...@debian.org (2015-03-05):
Cyril Brulebois, le Thu 05 Mar 2015 07:07:27 +0100, a écrit :
here's a first round of unblock/unblock-udeb hints for the upcoming d-i
jessie RC2. Don't hesitate to ask questions if anything looks
Samuel Thibault sthiba...@debian.org (2015-03-05):
Cyril Brulebois, le Thu 05 Mar 2015 07:07:27 +0100, a écrit :
here's a first round of unblock/unblock-udeb hints for the upcoming d-i
jessie RC2. Don't hesitate to ask questions if anything looks fishy.
Can we also perhaps unblock tasksel
# various keymap/options/etc. changes:
unblock console-setup/1.117
unblock-udeb console-setup/1.117
Crap. I'm just seeing this 5 minutes after uploading 1.118 with 5 more
translation updates.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On 2015-03-05 07:07, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
Hi people,
here's a first round of unblock/unblock-udeb hints for the upcoming d-i
jessie RC2. Don't hesitate to ask questions if anything looks fishy.
Hi,
Done all except:
[...]
# various keymap/options/etc. changes:
unblock console-setup
Hi people,
here's a first round of unblock/unblock-udeb hints for the upcoming d-i
jessie RC2. Don't hesitate to ask questions if anything looks fishy.
# mainly l10n, plus removal of stray generators/92volatile file
unblock apt-setup/1:0.93
unblock-udeb apt-setup/1:0.93
# various keymap
From aa57d3cc600de9d9ff3e318dc4beed33cfcfd9f3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Cyril Brulebois k...@debian.org
Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2014 11:29:36 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] Document the jessie branching.
---
debian/changelog | 8 +++-
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git
(CC'ed in case you guys subscribed to -release. I am subscribed
so please no CC)
Quoting Michael Tokarev (m...@tls.msk.ru):
So you're continuing to ruin my (hard in this case) work, spreading lies
(invasive) and confirming you're against others working on debian.
Given that Cyril is THE
27.01.2015 08:59, Christian PERRIER пишет:
(CC'ed in case you guys subscribed to -release. I am subscribed
so please no CC)
Quoting Michael Tokarev (m...@tls.msk.ru):
So you're continuing to ruin my (hard in this case) work, spreading lies
(invasive) and confirming you're against others
Hi Kibi,
On Tue, Jan 06, 2015 at 01:04:53AM +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
Also, is anything planned for busybox? Or do you want an NMU with just
the CVE fix?
I had a look a while ago, which resulted in the following local patch
(attached); if you can suggest a suitable version number, and
Hi Steven,
On Tue, Jan 06, 2015 at 12:09:46AM +, Steven Chamberlain wrote:
On 06/01/15 00:04, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
Ivo De Decker iv...@debian.org (2015-01-06):
First of all: would you be ok with an unblock-udeb for kfreebsd-10?
Provided Steven/BSD people are fine with it (possibly
Cyril Brulebois k...@debian.org (2015-01-05):
Cyril Brulebois k...@debian.org (2014-12-29):
here's another round I've just compiled, so versions should match this
time. A few of them have (outdated) hints currently but hopefully those
should go away automatically when caught by hint clean
Hi,
On Mon, Jan 05, 2015 at 10:32:11PM +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
Can we please pretend I didn't forget to mention this? ;)
We can try, but I can't promise anything.
# Doc doc doc!
unblock installation-guide/20141230
That one was easier :)
Unblocked.
Cheers,
Ivo
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE,
Hi Kibi,
On Mon, Jan 05, 2015 at 10:25:34PM +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
Cyril Brulebois k...@debian.org (2014-12-29):
here's another round I've just compiled, so versions should match this
time. A few of them have (outdated) hints currently but hopefully those
should go away
Hi Ivo,
Ivo De Decker iv...@debian.org (2015-01-06):
On Mon, Jan 05, 2015 at 10:25:34PM +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
Cyril Brulebois k...@debian.org (2014-12-29):
here's another round I've just compiled, so versions should match
this time. A few of them have (outdated) hints currently
Hi!
On 06/01/15 00:04, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
Ivo De Decker iv...@debian.org (2015-01-06):
First of all: would you be ok with an unblock-udeb for kfreebsd-10?
Provided Steven/BSD people are fine with it (possibly with urgenting),
I'm very OK with having it in testing before d-i gets
Cyril Brulebois k...@debian.org (2014-12-29):
here's another round I've just compiled, so versions should match this
time. A few of them have (outdated) hints currently but hopefully those
should go away automatically when caught by hint clean once newer
versions have migrated?
Last round
. A few of them have (outdated) hints currently but hopefully those
should go away automatically when caught by hint clean once newer
versions have migrated?
I'll try and give btrfs things a shot a few hours from now, so that I
can decide what to do with the pending request about lzo2.
If I'm
another round I've just compiled, so versions should match this
time. A few of them have (outdated) hints currently but hopefully those
should go away automatically when caught by hint clean once newer
versions have migrated?
I'll try and give btrfs things a shot a few hours from now, so that I
with debian-bsd@
unblock kfreebsd-10/10.1~svn273874-1
unblock-udeb kfreebsd-10/10.1~svn273874-1
Added, based on https://lists.debian.org/debian-bsd/2014/12/msg3.html
Yes, thanks.
unblock netcfg/1.125
unblock-udeb netcfg/1.125
I added these hints for 1.126, as this adds another
that to a hints file of yours, or I'll do so when I
have more time, possibly reviewing recent updates of packages uploaded
in the meanwhile.
Mraw,
KiBi.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
added these hints for 1.126, as this adds another translation (I guess
that's fine, but if it isn't, let me know).
# TODO: pango1.0 isn't unblocked but:
unblock-udeb pango1.0/1.36.8-3
Added and unblocked.
# TODO: KiBi uploaded that one:
unblock partman-base/180
unblock-udeb partman-base/180
On 2014-08-17 09:59, Niels Thykier wrote:
Hi,
Find attached patch that fixes a minor regression introduced in commit
a46dd88 by yours truly. I intend to merge into master in a couple of
days if no one beats me to it. I have added a new test case
(regression-a46dd88) for the particular
) hints (easy or hint-hints) to
fail, where Britney2 prior to commit a46dd88 would have accepted them.
I consider these to be unlikely because:
* They must involve an uninstallability trade[1] during the init run
(i.e. the non-recurse run)
- The recurse run is unaffected by this bug
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: wishlist
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: tools
In addition to displaying the result of attempting to migrate a
particular package on its own, it would be helpful if migration.pl could
display the results of any hints (manual
Dear Release Team,
Will the unblock-udeb hints be removed soon, or is it still necessary to
open unblock requests?
Currently this blocks a src:kfreebsd-9 security update from entering
testing, because some udebs are built from it.
src:linux also had an update recently which is blocked too
Hi Steven,
(cc-ing -boot@ or me would be nice when it comes to udeb things, even
if the release team can forward requests; or if I happen to spot it
on -release@.)
Steven Chamberlain ste...@pyro.eu.org (07/05/2013):
Will the unblock-udeb hints be removed soon, or is it still
necessary to open
On Tue, 2013-05-07 at 19:23 +0100, Steven Chamberlain wrote:
Will the unblock-udeb hints be removed soon, or is it still necessary to
open unblock requests?
I realise Cyril already replied, but for the record that's not our
decision.
The block-udeb hints are maintained by the release team
Hi,
As part of the octave transition, the following hints should be added to
allow testing migration of a bunch of Octave-related packages:
easy octave-communications/1.1.0-2 octave-control/2.3.50-1
octave-data-smoothing/1.3.0-2 octave-econometrics/1:1.0.8-6
octave-financial/0.3.2-3 octave
Mehdi Dogguy mehdi.dog...@ens.fr writes:
[ Dropped CC to -release and replaced it by 667...@bugs.debian.org ]
On 16/04/12 11:26, Sébastien Villemot wrote:
Hi,
As part of the octave transition, the following hints should be
added to allow testing migration of a bunch of Octave-related
Sébastien Villemot sebastien.ville...@ens.fr writes:
A bug still needs to be filed against libsml, we’ll
do it shortly.
Sorry, double mistake here: first, it is libsBml; second, no need to
file an Octave-related bug, the problem is an FTBFS on s390x.
Thanks,
--
Sébastien Villemot
Researcher
wrote:
Hi,
As part of the octave transition, the following hints should be
added to allow testing migration of a bunch of Octave-related
packages:
easy octave-communications/1.1.0-2 octave-control/2.3.50-1
octave-data-smoothing/1.3.0-2 octave-econometrics/1:1.0.8-6
octave
Hi,
Am Montag, den 16.04.2012, 11:51 +0200 schrieb Mehdi Dogguy:
[ Dropped CC to -release and replaced it by 667...@bugs.debian.org ]
On 16/04/12 11:26, Sébastien Villemot wrote:
Hi,
As part of the octave transition, the following hints should be
added to allow testing migration
Hi,
nice, today the first correct hint was generated:
Trying easy from satbritney: libgpiv/0.6.1-4 pygpiv/2.0.0-4
leading: libgpiv,pygpiv
start: 39+113: i-3:a-0:a-0:i-1:k-15:k-15:m-0:m-1:p-0:s-2:s-2:a-40:s-73
orig: 39+113: i-3:a-0:a-0:i-1:k-15:k-15:m-0:m-1:p-0:s-2:s-2:a-40:s-73
easy: 39+112:
On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 09:21:42 +0200, Joachim Breitner wrote:
I’m not sure how much work it was to do so, but – and I hope this is
Just about 0 (it's part of the things I need to handle anyway).
Cheers,
Julien
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Hi,
after having stopped working on SAT-Britney for about half a year, I
recently got a motivating mail and finally sat down and fixed a few of
the remaining annoyances to bring it into a usable form. It runs now
twice a day on ries and, thanks to Phil, the resulting hints are copied
to franck
and, thanks to Phil, the resulting hints are copied
to franck and executed by britney:
http://release.debian.org/britney/hints/satbritney
It only generates easy hints, and britney is configured to only allow
easy hints from it, so this should be pretty safe.
I think this would be quite
Package: release.debian.org
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: tools
hint's clean action only takes account of source versions when
deciding whether a migration hint has been completed.
For instance, if one has a hint for pushing armhf and s390x packages -
e.g. force-hint
On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 12:34:03PM +0100, Joachim Breitner wrote:
unless I am mistaken, a large number of Haskell packages can now
migrate, please try the attached easy hints file.
It worked, thanks. :)
Kind regards
Philipp Kern
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Dear Release team,
unless I am mistaken, a large number of Haskell packages can now
migrate, please try the attached easy hints file.
Greetings,
Joachim
--
Joachim nomeata Breitner
Debian Developer
nome...@debian.org | ICQ# 74513189 | GPG-Keyid: 4743206C
JID: nome...@joachim-breitner.de
Alle venerdì 14 ottobre 2011, Adam D. Barratt ha scritto:
On Fri, 14 Oct 2011 10:15:09 +0200, Pino Toscano wrote:
we (debian-qt-kde) recently replaced kdebindings with a serie of
split
sources for it, and got kdebindings removed from unstable
(#645074). However, there are two dependencies
Hi,
we (debian-qt-kde) recently replaced kdebindings with a serie of split
sources for it, and got kdebindings removed from unstable (#645074).
However, there are two dependencies (plasma-scriptengine-ruby and
omaque) that depend on binaries previously in kdebindings and now in
korundum; would
On Fri, 14 Oct 2011 10:15:09 +0200, Pino Toscano wrote:
we (debian-qt-kde) recently replaced kdebindings with a serie of
split
sources for it, and got kdebindings removed from unstable (#645074).
However, there are two dependencies (plasma-scriptengine-ruby and
omaque) that depend on binaries
Hi,
please consider adding the following migration hints:
easy eog/3.0.2-2 eog-plugins/3.0.0-2
easy gnome-utils/3.0.1-5 gtranslator/2.90.5-2
Best regards
Alexander Kurtz
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
On Thu, 04 Aug 2011 11:15:54 +, Alexander Kurtz wrote:
please consider adding the following migration hints:
easy eog/3.0.2-2 eog-plugins/3.0.0-2
Added; thanks.
easy gnome-utils/3.0.1-5 gtranslator/2.90.5-2
This, otoh, I've not added. gtranslator is RC-buggy and so
Hi,
Am Dienstag, den 05.07.2011, 18:45 +0100 schrieb Adam D. Barratt:
On Tue, 2011-07-05 at 18:31 +0200, Joachim Breitner wrote:
may I kindly ping about this issue? To my knowledge, all the packages
mentioned here
http://release.debian.org/migration/testing.pl?package=ghc have been
Hi,
Am Samstag, den 02.07.2011, 20:56 +0200 schrieb Joachim Breitner:
if I read http://release.debian.org/migration/testing.pl?package=ghc
correctly then ghc could migrate to testing if some of the binNMUed
packages mentioned there would migrate at the same time. I just
scheduled the the
On Tue, 2011-07-05 at 18:31 +0200, Joachim Breitner wrote:
may I kindly ping about this issue? To my knowledge, all the packages
mentioned here
http://release.debian.org/migration/testing.pl?package=ghc have been
binNMUed to be able to transition together with ghc-7.0.3-2.
I've added a hint
Hi,
if I read http://release.debian.org/migration/testing.pl?package=ghc
correctly then ghc could migrate to testing if some of the binNMUed
packages mentioned there would migrate at the same time. I just
scheduled the the remaining binNMUs on armel (which was late to build
ghc), and they are
Hi,
would you consider adding removal hints for the following packages?
* libfreenect (needs removed glut, #616525)
* bitlbee-skype (needs removed skype4py, #622739)
Thanks
--
.''`.
: :' : Luca Falavigna dktrkr...@debian.org
`. `'
`-
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital
On 05/29/2011 01:02 PM, Luca Falavigna wrote:
Hi,
would you consider adding removal hints for the following packages?
* libfreenect (needs removed glut, #616525)
* bitlbee-skype (needs removed skype4py, #622739)
Removal hints added.
Cheers,
--
Mehdi Dogguy مهدي الدڤي
http://dogguy.org
* Julien Cristau (jcris...@debian.org) [100919 01:39]:
On Sun, Sep 19, 2010 at 01:04:59 +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
* Adam D. Barratt (a...@adam-barratt.org.uk) [100919 00:33]:
[ Short version for the impatient - I'd like to make britney require all
architectures to be built in t-p-u
On Sun, 2010-09-19 at 08:14 +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
* Julien Cristau (jcris...@debian.org) [100919 01:39]:
On Sun, Sep 19, 2010 at 01:04:59 +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
* Adam D. Barratt (a...@adam-barratt.org.uk) [100919 00:33]:
[ Short version for the impatient - I'd like to make
On Sun, 2010-09-19 at 07:50 +0200, Luk Claes wrote:
On 09/19/2010 12:33 AM, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
As a consequence of all of the above, I'd like to propose modifying the
semantics of approve so that the hint can be added straight away and
the t-p-u package only becomes a valid candidate
[ Short version for the impatient - I'd like to make britney require all
architectures to be built in t-p-u before paying any attention to an
approve hint ]
Hi,
For as long as I can remember, the advice for adding approve hints to
migrate packages from t-p-u to testing has been make sure the t-p
* Adam D. Barratt (a...@adam-barratt.org.uk) [100919 00:33]:
[ Short version for the impatient - I'd like to make britney require all
architectures to be built in t-p-u before paying any attention to an
approve hint ]
cool. can we please as well get an force-approve? ;=)
Andi
--
To
On Sun, Sep 19, 2010 at 01:04:59 +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
* Adam D. Barratt (a...@adam-barratt.org.uk) [100919 00:33]:
[ Short version for the impatient - I'd like to make britney require all
architectures to be built in t-p-u before paying any attention to an
approve hint ]
cool.
On 09/19/2010 12:33 AM, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
As a consequence of all of the above, I'd like to propose modifying the
semantics of approve so that the hint can be added straight away and
the t-p-u package only becomes a valid candidate once it's available on
all the architectures on which it
not understand entirely what the hints README says
about this.
Regards,
Ansgar
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/874oh66una@marvin.43-1.org
1 - 100 of 269 matches
Mail list logo
