Re: How to get KDE in: total analysis

2005-11-06 Thread Nathanael Nerode
You obviously know where the upstream bug systems are; wouldn't it be more helpful to take the initiative and forward thesebug reports yourself? Actually, it probably wouldn't. The first request upstream will make is to test on an stock version of GCC, rather than Debian GCC. The upstream bug

Re: How to get KDE in: total analysis

2005-11-01 Thread Steve Langasek
On Mon, Oct 31, 2005 at 04:25:31PM -0500, Nathanael Nerode wrote: Steve Langasek wrote: In any case, please see http://ftp-master.debian.org/~vorlon/KDE-missing-bysource.txt for a separate analysis. With reference to that :-), please note the following; after going through that and the

Re: How to get KDE in: total analysis

2005-10-31 Thread Nathanael Nerode
Steve Langasek wrote: And without forcing them, this: force kdeaddons/4:3.4.2-2.1 will not work because a force hint will not cause consideration of packages which britney eliminates due to dependencies. In the end, kdeaddons should most likely be force-hint forced into testing along with the

Re: How to get KDE in: total analysis

2005-10-30 Thread Steve Langasek
On Sat, Oct 29, 2005 at 05:07:49PM -0400, Nathanael Nerode wrote: I expect that gcc-4.0 blockages are only going to increase as time goes on, because some maintainers can't seem to stop making uploads, so the faster this can be done, the better. Now, it's true that no matter what we do, a

How to get KDE in: total analysis

2005-10-29 Thread Nathanael Nerode
I believe that the following solve (in one way or another) all the packages broken by the imagemagick or KDE hints on i386 as of last night, *not* including those already dealt with in vorlon's hint file. Everything here deals with some actual specific package broken by one of those two hints.