Re: Important or serious bug in loudmouth + libasyncns

2010-11-24 Thread Tanguy Ortolo
Le mercredi 24 novembre 2010, Julien Cristau a écrit : >> Would the release team accept such changes into Squeeze? If this bug >> makes packages unusable on armel, it may qualify as RC. > > That's kind of moot unless there's a proposed patch. Is there? Not yet, but I shall prepare one if I manag

Re: Important or serious bug in loudmouth + libasyncns

2010-11-24 Thread Julien Cristau
On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 15:30:29 +, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > Would the release team accept such changes into Squeeze? If this bug > makes packages unusable on armel, it may qualify as RC. > That's kind of moot unless there's a proposed patch. Is there? Cheers, Julien signature.asc

Re: Important or serious bug in loudmouth + libasyncns

2010-11-24 Thread Tanguy Ortolo
Le mercredi 24 novembre 2010, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort a écrit : > On 24/11/10 14:31, Tanguy Ortolo wrote: >> I would like to help fixing that, but I am not sure of how to proceed. >> My guess is that loudmouth should be patched to use the packaged >> libasyncns, and that libasyncns should be updated

Re: Important or serious bug in loudmouth + libasyncns

2010-11-24 Thread Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
On 24/11/10 14:31, Tanguy Ortolo wrote: Hello, I have just faced a bug accros several packages, that has the effect of rendering any Jabber client based on loudmouth unusable on armel. This is the bug #566143. Here is a summary: * loudmouth embeds a copy of libasyncns, version 0.3, that fails o