Re: Is a fix for #503820 suitable for Lenny?

2008-12-14 Thread Luk Claes
Nelson A. de Oliveira wrote: > Hi! > > On Tue, 09 Dec 2008 20:04:55 +0100 > Luk Claes wrote: > >> Yes, please tell us when it's uploaded. > > pngtools 0.3-2 uploaded. unblocked Cheers Luk -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe".

Re: Is a fix for #503820 suitable for Lenny?

2008-12-10 Thread Nelson A. de Oliveira
Hi! On Tue, 09 Dec 2008 20:04:55 +0100 Luk Claes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Yes, please tell us when it's uploaded. pngtools 0.3-2 uploaded. Thank you very much! Best regards, Nelson signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: Is a fix for #503820 suitable for Lenny?

2008-12-09 Thread Luk Claes
Nelson A. de Oliveira wrote: > Hi! > > On Thu, 04 Dec 2008 14:54:03 +0100 > Julien BLACHE <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> "Nelson A. de Oliveira" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: You are replacing an unsigned type by a signed type (several occurrences). Is that intentional? >>> This fix is fr

Re: Is a fix for #503820 suitable for Lenny?

2008-12-05 Thread Nelson A. de Oliveira
Hi! On Thu, 04 Dec 2008 14:54:03 +0100 Julien BLACHE <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > "Nelson A. de Oliveira" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> You are replacing an unsigned type by a signed type (several > >> occurrences). Is that intentional? > > > > This fix is from upstream. > > I can confirm with

Re: Is a fix for #503820 suitable for Lenny?

2008-12-04 Thread Julien BLACHE
"Nelson A. de Oliveira" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi, >> You are replacing an unsigned type by a signed type (several >> occurrences). Is that intentional? > > This fix is from upstream. > I can confirm with him if you would like to. Better confirm with upstream than introduce new, subtle bugs

Re: Is a fix for #503820 suitable for Lenny?

2008-12-04 Thread Nelson A. de Oliveira
Hi Julien! On Thu, 04 Dec 2008 14:39:00 +0100 Julien BLACHE <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > "Nelson A. de Oliveira" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > +-unsigned int i; > > ++int32_t i; > > You are replacing an unsigned type by a signed type (several > occurrences). Is that intentional? This f

Re: Is a fix for #503820 suitable for Lenny?

2008-12-04 Thread Julien BLACHE
"Nelson A. de Oliveira" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi, > +-unsigned int i; > ++int32_t i; You are replacing an unsigned type by a signed type (several occurrences). Is that intentional? JB. -- Julien BLACHE - Debian & GNU/Linux Developer - <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Public key available

Is a fix for #503820 suitable for Lenny?

2008-12-04 Thread Nelson A. de Oliveira
Hi! About #503820, do you think that it's OK (and allow me) to upload a fix to unstable (targeted at Lenny), fixing it, please? The changes: diff -u pngtools-0.3/debian/changelog pngtools-0.3/debian/changelog --- pngtools-0.3/debian/changelog +++ pngtools-0.3/debian/changelog @@ -1,3 +1,9 @@ +pn