Re: Is this serious for etch? [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Bug#417013: depends on non-essential package debconf in postrm]

2007-04-01 Thread Andreas Barth
* Ola Lundqvist ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [070401 20:40]: > I just got this bugreport and I agree that it is a problem. > > Package: ntop > Severity: serious > Tags: etch-ignore Obviously not. Cheers, Andi -- http://home.arcor.de/andreas-barth/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with

Re: Is this serious for etch? [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Bug#417013: depends on non-essential package debconf in postrm]

2007-04-01 Thread Ola Lundqvist
Hi again. Sorry for bothering you. I did not read the last part of the bug report where it told me that it was marked as etch-ignore. Ignore the last mail (and then this one as well). Regards, // Ola On Sun, Apr 01, 2007 at 08:23:34PM +0200, Ola Lundqvist wrote: > Hi > > I just got this bugre

Is this serious for etch? [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Bug#417013: depends on non-essential package debconf in postrm]

2007-04-01 Thread Ola Lundqvist
Hi I just got this bugreport and I agree that it is a problem. However I want your opinion whether this is serious or not. Especially as it is a bit tricky to get ntop into etch, because of the libgd2 dependency problem while building for some arches. Regards, // Ola - Forwarded message fr