Hi Holger,
Thanks to check and your comment.
On Sat, 9 May 2009 18:01:46 +0200
Holger Levsen hol...@layer-acht.org wrote:
It's better and I've uploaded it now. But please,
a.) you bumped Standards-Version in debian/control, without mentioning in
debian/changelog, and really you shouldn't
Hi,
On Donnerstag, 30. April 2009, Hideki Yamane wrote:
henr...@babytalk:~/src/2ch-browser/jd$ debdiff jd_2.0.0-080722-2.dsc
jd_2.0.0-080722-2+lenny1.dsc |diffstat debian/patches/post-cookie.dpatch
| 379 ++ jd-2.0.0-080722/debian/changelog
|7
Hi RM,
On Sat, 25 Apr 2009 14:29:23 +0200
Philipp Kern pk...@debian.org wrote:
$ debdiff jd_2.0.0-080722-2.dsc jd_2.0.0-080722-2+lenny1.dsc|diffstat
debian/patches/post-cookie.dpatch | 2696
++
jd-2.0.0-080722/debian/changelog |7
On Wed, Apr 01, 2009 at 05:20:38PM +0100, Holger Levsen wrote:
Hi,
On Mittwoch, 1. April 2009, Hideki Yamane wrote:
Until change happened in BBS, hardcoded cookie hana=mogera was used.
After the change, JD needs to add functions and fixes for that cookie
code, so it's big but is
On Sat, Apr 18, 2009 at 08:12:56AM +0900, Hideki Yamane wrote:
And for example, at the first point release
pidgin Fix failure while connecting to ICQ servers due to protocol
changes
postgresql-8.3 New upstream bugfix release
pidgin deals with protocol changes and postgresql
Hi,
On Sat, 25 Apr 2009 14:33:40 +0200
Philipp Kern pk...@debian.org wrote:
I am afraid that there are differences in handling packages which have 23000
users reporting to popcon and 83.
First, popcon is disabled by default.
And second, 2ch BBS is anonymous BBS, so its users don't want to
Hi,
On Thu, 2 Apr 2009 12:06:10 +0200
Holger Levsen hol...@layer-acht.org wrote:
If the fix is too intrusive for a lenny point release the way to support it
is
in backports.org, where it already is.
I don't think too intrusive, because no packages are depending on JD package.
And is there
On Wed, 1 Apr 2009 17:20:38 +0100
Holger Levsen hol...@layer-acht.org wrote:
On Mittwoch, 1. April 2009, Hideki Yamane wrote:
Until change happened in BBS, hardcoded cookie hana=mogera was used.
After the change, JD needs to add functions and fixes for that cookie
code, so it's big but
Hi Hideki,
On Donnerstag, 2. April 2009, Hideki Yamane wrote:
SRMs, would that be ok for 5.0.2? If not, I'd suggest removal from
stable.
Or put it into volatile, please.
Thats a bug, which makes the package unusable, so the solution is either to
fix it or to remove it. Volatile is for
Hi,
On Mon, 30 Mar 2009 06:45:53 +0900
Hideki Yamane henr...@debian.or.jp wrote:
Still I'm not sure the stable release managers like such a big diff - or am
I
wrong? If so, please comment, I'd be happy to sponsor this to s-p-u
Until change happened in BBS, hardcoded cookie
Hi,
On Mittwoch, 1. April 2009, Hideki Yamane wrote:
Until change happened in BBS, hardcoded cookie hana=mogera was used.
After the change, JD needs to add functions and fixes for that cookie
code, so it's big but is needed (to make it from half-broken to fixed
one).
Hi,
On Sun, 29 Mar 2009 11:30:00 +0100
Holger Levsen hol...@layer-acht.org wrote:
As I understood it, this bug makes the package in lenny completly unusable,
right?
Um, not completely but its half broken (by changes made with some BBS).
JD, it is a kind of web browser for some but huge
12 matches
Mail list logo
