I read this last week just before slipping into a fever in which I had
recurring dreams about the relations of unnameable abstract entities
that seemed later to correspond to software components.
On recovering from the flu, I was pleased to find that I hadn't
imagined that Niels Thykier wrote:
>
Hi,
On the Release Team's IRC meeting today we concluded the following[1]:
* We expect to release Stretch with the LTS release based on Linux 4.10
* We intend to delay the freeze (all milestone dates) by 2 months to
accommodate the above.
- Note that the expected release date of Linux
On Sun, 2016-02-14 at 15:48 -0500, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> * Ben Hutchings [2016-02-14 15:58]:
> > > * If we stick with 4.4, the Debian Linux maintainers receives
> > > practically no advantage from Greg's LTS effort.
> >
> > No, we would benefit from that but this is
Hi,
On 2016-02-02 08:34, Niels Thykier wrote:
Based on the current 9 week upstream release cycle, the longterm
branch
for 2017 will presumably be based on Linux 4.10, released at the end
of
week 3 (22nd January 2017). That's well after the planned stretch
freeze date so I don't see how it
* Ben Hutchings [2016-02-14 15:58]:
> > * If we stick with 4.4, the Debian Linux maintainers receives
> > practically no advantage from Greg's LTS effort.
>
> No, we would benefit from that but this is very early to freeze the
> kernel and we would need to do a lot of
On Fri, 2016-02-05 at 18:48 +, Niels Thykier wrote:
> Ben Hutchings:
> > On Tue, 2016-02-02 at 07:34 +, Niels Thykier wrote:
[...]
> > I thought that 10 week cycles were rare, but I checked this and now I'm
> > much less confident. Rounding to the nearest week, the distribution of
> >
On Sat, Jan 30, 2016 at 03:34:16PM +0100, Moritz Mühlenhoff wrote:
> I would need to confirm that, but AFAICS the non-LTS kernels after 3.11 are
> all maintained for two years (since they are now made available at "hardware
> enablement kernels" for the Ubuntu LTS releases.
Non-LTS kernels can be
Ben Hutchings:
> On Tue, 2016-02-02 at 07:34 +, Niels Thykier wrote:
> [...]
>>
>> Would you prefer that we moved future freezes (i.e. Buster and later),
>> so we could always rely on Greg's branch?
>
> Yes, I would.
>
Ok, we will take it into consideration for the planning of the next
On Thu, Feb 4, 2016 at 10:18:44 +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> On Tue, 02 Feb 2016, Niels Thykier wrote:
> > > Greg's new policy is to pick the first Linus release in each year for
> > > longterm maintenance. The longterm branch for 2016 is based on Linux
> > > 4.4, released at the end of week
On Thu, Feb 4, 2016 at 11:45 AM, Antonio Terceiro wrote:
> Yet another data point: Ruby makes stable releases every Christmas
Wine also plans their freeze in the fall now, which ended up in a
release near Christmas this year. If the same holds this year, that
will be too late for the Debian
On Tue, 2016-02-02 at 07:34 +, Niels Thykier wrote:
[...]
> > Greg's new policy is to pick the first Linus release in each year for
> > longterm maintenance. The longterm branch for 2016 is based on Linux
> > 4.4, released at the end of week 1 (10th January). By the time stretch
> > is
On Tue, 02 Feb 2016, Niels Thykier wrote:
> > Greg's new policy is to pick the first Linus release in each year for
> > longterm maintenance. The longterm branch for 2016 is based on Linux
> > 4.4, released at the end of week 1 (10th January). By the time stretch
> > is released, 4.4 will be
On Thu, Feb 04, 2016 at 10:18:44AM +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> On Tue, 02 Feb 2016, Niels Thykier wrote:
> > > Greg's new policy is to pick the first Linus release in each year for
> > > longterm maintenance. The longterm branch for 2016 is based on Linux
> > > 4.4, released at the end of
* Karsten Merker [2016-02-03 08:28]:
> > Having people around to test d-i daily builds until the kernel reaches
> > testing
> > would be nice, so that we don't wait until the d-i upload (and maybe d-i
> > image
> > builds) using testing's kernel to get some feedback.
>
> I
On Feb 2, 2016, at 11:28 PM, Karsten Merker wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 02, 2016 at 02:23:06PM +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
>> Niels Thykier (2016-02-02):
>>> @Kernel+d-i - What is your take on the following:
>>>
>>> * How long will it take to have the new
Hi,
(Thanks for the prod.)
Niels Thykier (2016-02-02):
> @Kernel+d-i - What is your take on the following:
>
> * How long will it take to have the new release ready?
>- That is, the latency between the 22nd and us having it in unstable.
>- How certain are we on the
Hi Ben,
Pulling in d-i on this, since they might be affected by this. If you
know of a maintainer that would be similarly affected, let me know, so
we can ask them as well.
Ben Hutchings:
> [...]
>
> For stretch, I would very much like to choose a kernel version for
> stret
On Sat, Jan 30, 2016 at 03:30:37PM +0100, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 11:42:13PM +0100, maximilian attems wrote:
> >
> > Well, those efforts have not a good track record, afais Ben is maintaining
> > their lts Linus.
>
> I don't really understand the second half of your
On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 11:42:13PM +0100, maximilian attems wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 08:01:13PM +0100, Moritz Mühlenhoff wrote:
> > Ben Hutchings <b...@decadent.org.uk> wrote:
> > > For stretch, I would very much like to choose a kernel version for
> >
On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 08:15:30PM +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Thu, 2016-01-28 at 20:01 +0100, Moritz Mühlenhoff wrote:
> > Ben Hutchings <b...@decadent.org.uk> wrote:
> > > For stretch, I would very much like to choose a kernel version for
> > > stretch that
On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 08:01:13PM +0100, Moritz Mühlenhoff wrote:
> Ben Hutchings <b...@decadent.org.uk> wrote:
> > For stretch, I would very much like to choose a kernel version for
> > stretch that gets longterm maintenance by Greg Kroah-Hartman. That
> > lasts 2 year
On Thu, 2016-01-28 at 20:01 +0100, Moritz Mühlenhoff wrote:
> Ben Hutchings <b...@decadent.org.uk> wrote:
> > For stretch, I would very much like to choose a kernel version for
> > stretch that gets longterm maintenance by Greg Kroah-Hartman. That
> > lasts 2 year
a kernel version for
stretch that gets longterm maintenance by Greg Kroah-Hartman. That
lasts 2 years from release, after which someone else (maybe me) can
take over. I do not want to maintain 3 kernel longterm branches at a
time, and there is consensus among the stable maintainers
23 matches
Mail list logo