Hi,
>So basically there's ghc and gambas3 left.
>
>ghc is using 3.7 in experimental, so it will be fixed with the next haskell
>transition.
true, even if some talks about embedding some llvm code in the source code :)
(rationale is: used only for building and only for arm*)
>Unfortunately I
On 30/09/15 11:38, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: transition
> X-debbugs-cc: sylves...@debian.org
>
> On 30/09/15 09:52, Sylvestre Ledru wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> Le 11/08/2015 11:10, Sylvestre
On 22/11/15 23:26, Andreas Cadhalpun wrote:
> Dear release team,
>
> afl-clang is also involved in this transition, as it depends on:
> clang (<< 1:3.6), clang (>= 1:3.5)
>
> Hence it is currently uninstallable in sid, which was reported as #804852.
Thanks for catching that. I have updated the
Dear release team,
afl-clang is also involved in this transition, as it depends on:
clang (<< 1:3.6), clang (>= 1:3.5)
Hence it is currently uninstallable in sid, which was reported as #804852.
After a no-change-rebuild in current sid, these dependencies change to:
clang (<< 1:3.7), clang (>=
Le 01/11/2015 12:11, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort a écrit :
> On 11/10/15 14:14, Sylvestre Ledru wrote:
>> Le 30/09/2015 11:38, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort a écrit :
FYI, LLVM 3.7 has been released.
The safe way would be to do 3.5 => 3.6 now and 3.6 => 3.7 once 3.7.1 is
released (in one or two
On 11/10/15 14:14, Sylvestre Ledru wrote:
> Le 30/09/2015 11:38, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort a écrit :
>>
>>> FYI, LLVM 3.7 has been released.
>>> The safe way would be to do 3.5 => 3.6 now and 3.6 => 3.7 once 3.7.1 is
>>> released (in one or two months)
>>> or the fun way would be to skip 3.6 in the
Le 30/09/2015 11:38, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort a écrit :
>
>> FYI, LLVM 3.7 has been released.
>> The safe way would be to do 3.5 => 3.6 now and 3.6 => 3.7 once 3.7.1 is
>> released (in one or two months)
>> or the fun way would be to skip 3.6 in the transition.
>> I would prefer the first option but
Hello,
Le 11/08/2015 11:10, Sylvestre Ledru a écrit :
> Hello,
>
> I am planning to update llvm-default to LLVM & Clang 3.6. The changes have
> been in exp for a while.
> However, I would like to know what is best from the release team POV:
>
Can we start this transition?
FYI, LLVM 3.7 has been
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> retitle 800509 transition: llvm-toolchain-3.6
Bug #800509 [release.debian.org] LLVM default to 3.6 transition ?
Changed Bug title to 'transition: llvm-toolchain-3.6' from 'LLVM default to 3.6
transition ?'
> thanks
Stopping processin
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition
X-debbugs-cc: sylves...@debian.org
On 30/09/15 09:52, Sylvestre Ledru wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Le 11/08/2015 11:10, Sylvestre Ledru a écrit :
>> Hello,
>>
>> I am planning to update
Hello,
I am planning to update llvm-default to LLVM Clang 3.6. The changes have been
in exp for a while.
However, I would like to know what is best from the release team POV:
1) Upload soon (while gcc-5 is still transitioning)
2) After the gcc-5 transition
Thanks,
Sylvestre
--
To
On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 11:10:05 +0200, Sylvestre Ledru wrote:
Hello,
I am planning to update llvm-default to LLVM Clang 3.6. The changes have
been in exp for a while.
However, I would like to know what is best from the release team POV:
1) Upload soon (while gcc-5 is still
On 08/11/2015 11:19 AM, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 11:10:05 +0200, Sylvestre Ledru wrote:
Hello,
I am planning to update llvm-default to LLVM Clang 3.6. The changes have
been in exp for a while.
However, I would like to know what is best from the release team POV:
1)
Le 11/08/2015 14:35, Matthias Klose a écrit :
On 08/11/2015 11:19 AM, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 11:10:05 +0200, Sylvestre Ledru wrote:
Hello,
I am planning to update llvm-default to LLVM Clang 3.6. The changes have
been in exp for a while.
However, I would like to
14 matches
Mail list logo
