On Mon, Sep 12, 2005 at 09:27:31AM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 11, 2005 at 05:56:38PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> > On Sun, Sep 11, 2005 at 04:59:54PM +0200, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote:
> > > http://www.debian.org/devel/testing :
> > >
> > > 2. It must be compiled and up to date o
On Sun, Sep 11, 2005 at 05:56:38PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 11, 2005 at 04:59:54PM +0200, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote:
> > http://www.debian.org/devel/testing :
> >
> > 2. It must be compiled and up to date on all architectures it has previously
> > been compiled for in unstable
On Sun, Sep 11, 2005 at 04:59:54PM +0200, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 10, 2005 at 11:59:41PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > (...) but I don't see any reason to override britney's judgement regarding
> > the out-of-date hppa packages.
> > Please get an ftp-master to rene the old bin
On Sat, Sep 10, 2005 at 11:59:41PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> (...) but I don't see any reason to override britney's judgement regarding
> the out-of-date hppa packages.
> Please get an ftp-master to rene the old binaries, and then linux-2.6
> can go into testing.
Done, fwiw.
On Sun, Sep 11,
On Sat, Sep 10, 2005 at 11:59:41PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 10, 2005 at 08:08:45PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> > On Sat, Sep 10, 2005 at 12:18:50PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
> > > Sven Luther wrote:
> > > > So, the installer needs to be fixed ASAP.
>
> > > Getting a useable kernel
On Sat, Sep 10, 2005 at 08:08:45PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 10, 2005 at 12:18:50PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
> > Sven Luther wrote:
> > > So, the installer needs to be fixed ASAP.
> > Getting a useable kernel into testing is a prerequsite for making the
> > installer use it, not the o
On Sat, Sep 10, 2005 at 12:18:50PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
> Sven Luther wrote:
> > So, the installer needs to be fixed ASAP.
>
> Getting a useable kernel into testing is a prerequsite for making the
> installer use it, not the other way around.
sure, will happen as soon as it gets hinted in.
>
Sven Luther wrote:
> So, the installer needs to be fixed ASAP.
Getting a useable kernel into testing is a prerequsite for making the
installer use it, not the other way around.
In other words, the changes you recently made to base-installer for
powerpc to make it install the new kernel that is no
On Sat, Sep 10, 2005 at 11:09:45AM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
> Sven Luther wrote:
> > (CCing debian-release, as this may concern them, or they might have input,
> > so
> > i hope they will also pick up the hppa flavour rename hint above, oh, and we
> > should kill all 2.6.8 and 2.6.11 packages from
Sven Luther wrote:
> (CCing debian-release, as this may concern them, or they might have input, so
> i hope they will also pick up the hppa flavour rename hint above, oh, and we
> should kill all 2.6.8 and 2.6.11 packages from etch and sid now).
No, existing kernels that are a) sources of udebs of
On Sat, Sep 10, 2005 at 04:14:36AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 10, 2005 at 11:52:53AM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
> > On Sat, Sep 10, 2005 at 02:32:34AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > > I don't see any reason here for the release team to override the
> > > out-of-date hppa packages
On Sat, Sep 10, 2005 at 02:32:34AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 10, 2005 at 08:54:09AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
>
> > Now that linux 2.6.12-6 is ready to enter testing, (just waiting an RM
> > override for the hppa flavour rename)
>
> I don't see any reason here for the release tea
On Sat, Sep 10, 2005 at 11:52:53AM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 10, 2005 at 02:32:34AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > I don't see any reason here for the release team to override the
> > out-of-date hppa packages. Removing them is an ftp team task, not a
> > release team task.
> Wh
On Sat, Sep 10, 2005 at 02:32:34AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> I don't see any reason here for the release team to override the
> out-of-date hppa packages. Removing them is an ftp team task, not a
> release team task.
Why are they listed as out-of-date? There is no version in testing.
Bastia
On Sat, Sep 10, 2005 at 08:54:09AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> Now that linux 2.6.12-6 is ready to enter testing, (just waiting an RM
> override for the hppa flavour rename)
I don't see any reason here for the release team to override the
out-of-date hppa packages. Removing them is an ftp team t
Hi, ...
Now that linux 2.6.12-6 is ready to enter testing, (just waiting an RM
override for the hppa flavour rename), it would be good to declare a package
freeze of 2.6.12, and start working on 2.6.13. (well, with the exception of
the mips guys or other for 2.6.12 stuff).
(CCing debian-release,
16 matches
Mail list logo
