The package lua-svn fails to build on mipsel since the home directory is
set to /nonexistent and is not redable/writeable (and it seems the svn
library wants to write it).
http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.cgi?pkg=lua-svn;ver=0.3.0-1;arch=mipsel;stamp=1205613797
Cheers
--
Enrico Tassi
--
To
On 19/03/2008, Enrico Tassi wrote:
The package lua-svn fails to build on mipsel since the home directory
is set to /nonexistent and is not redable/writeable (and it seems the
svn library wants to write it).
On Wed, Mar 19, 2008 at 10:05:08AM +0100, Enrico Tassi wrote:
The package lua-svn fails to build on mipsel since the home directory is
set to /nonexistent and is not redable/writeable (and it seems the svn
library wants to write it).
On Wed, Mar 19, 2008 at 02:18:52AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
On Wed, Mar 19, 2008 at 10:05:08AM +0100, Enrico Tassi wrote:
The package lua-svn fails to build on mipsel since the home directory is
set to /nonexistent and is not redable/writeable (and it seems the svn
library wants to
On 19/03/2008, Enrico Tassi wrote:
But a later attemps was successful... Is there a way to know on which
buildd it is built?
First line of the log:
| Automatic build of lua-svn_0.2.5-1 on rem by sbuild/mipsel 99.99
^^^
Cheers,
--
Cyril Brulebois
On Wednesday 19 March 2008 15:33, Enrico Tassi wrote:
http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.cgi?pkg=lua-svnver=0.2.5-1arch=mipselsta
mp=1192380641file=log
But a later attemps was successful... Is there a way to know on which
buildd it is built?
The first line of the log tells you it was built on
On Wed, Mar 19, 2008 at 15:33:28 +0100, Enrico Tassi wrote:
On Wed, Mar 19, 2008 at 02:18:52AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
This is a broken package build, not a broken buildd. Your package build
should not be relying on the contents of $HOME.
It is not, running HOME=/fake debuild -us
On Wed, Mar 19, 2008 at 03:52:04PM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Wed, Mar 19, 2008 at 15:33:28 +0100, Enrico Tassi wrote:
On Wed, Mar 19, 2008 at 02:18:52AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
This is a broken package build, not a broken buildd. Your package build
should not be relying on
On Wed, Mar 19, 2008 at 04:17:00PM +0100, Enrico Tassi wrote:
That is what I suspected, it is the svn library that tries to read/write
in the users home, not my package. I'll write a work-around, but it is
pretty silly to me that just mipsel buildds define HOME pointing to a
directory that
9 matches
Mail list logo
