Re: Merged /usr - supported in stretch?

On Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 11:44:30PM +0100, Marco d'Itri wrote: > On Mar 21, Adrian Bunk wrote: >... > > Not limited to this bug, my general impression of the current state of > > merged /usr is that it mostly works - but it is not yet in a state that > > it should be used by normal users of Debian

Re: Merged /usr - supported in stretch?

Hi, On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 12:02:50AM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote: > (everything below is AFAIK and IMHO, please correct any mistakes) > (Andreas added due to piuparts, see 4.) please dont mail a...@debian.org if you want to reach the piuparts maintainers. Please use piuparts-de...@lists.alioth.deb

Re: Merged /usr - supported in stretch?

On Mar 21, Adrian Bunk wrote: > Merged /usr does not seem to be ready for a stable release right now. I disagree: it works quite well. > Not limited to this bug, my general impression of the current state of > merged /usr is that it mostly works - but it is not yet in a state that > it should b

Merged /usr - supported in stretch?

(everything below is AFAIK and IMHO, please correct any mistakes) (Andreas added due to piuparts, see 4.) 0. Introduction Merged /usr wiki page: https://wiki.debian.org/UsrMerge Merged /usr does not seem to be ready for a stable release right now. The rationale used when the severity of #810